RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 23, 2013, 10:06:53 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KKNG changing formats  (Read 2131 times)
OKCRadioGuy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3013


Re: KKNG changing formats
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2013, 10:47:19 AM »

Un-premium No-choice you mean.... LOL!
Logged
OkieTrashTalker
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1


Re: KKNG changing formats
« Reply #21 on: March 08, 2013, 12:17:10 PM »

94.7 the Brew might surprise some folks over the next few months.  Lex & Terry have helped erode Katt's Rick & Brad ratings by over 50% in the last year and have already leap frogged KRXO and BOB mornings.  With the Baker boy at the reigns, Brew could really rock someone's world!
Logged
bchristi
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 302


Re: KKNG changing formats
« Reply #22 on: March 08, 2013, 06:29:45 PM »

You know, it's funny, but I've always thought that, while Tulsa was a more complete market because it had more signals, OKC usually had better quality radio when compared format-to-format. 

I'd much rather have KXXY over KXBL. 

KOMA has always been better than anything Tulsa has had to offer, whether it was KQLL or KTSO. 

KATT puts KMOD to shame.  While I think Star 103.3's flip to "Rock 103.3" has been a huge improvement, I'd still rather have KRXO.

I'd prefer KMGL over KRAV (except at night), though I have to admit I'd have KRAV over KYIS!

There are, however, two areas I'd definitely agree with you on: contemporary country and CHR/Top-40.  KWEN and KVOO are ten times better than KTST and Jake, and Tulsa's Twister is every bit as good.  I'd also have KTBT and KHTT over KJYO and KKWD, though that hasn't always been the case!



I agree with you on CHR.  5 years ago the situation was different but KKWD is almost un-listenable since Cumulus changed it to their national playlist. KJYO still sounds great with the exception of the Sunday night mix shows.  They are fairly balanced musically for a CHR and they should be being they are the only real game in town since KKWD plays mostly hits from 3-5 years ago.

And I agree with radio stations being set up to try to get the largest amount of the pie.  In OKC today, it seems like that format is classic rock. 
Logged
Kent
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 4212


Re: KKNG changing formats
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2013, 12:30:41 PM »

I agree with you on CHR.  5 years ago the situation was different but KKWD is almost un-listenable since Cumulus changed it to their national playlist. KJYO still sounds great with the exception of the Sunday night mix shows.  They are fairly balanced musically for a CHR and they should be being they are the only real game in town since KKWD plays mostly hits from 3-5 years ago.

I haven't listened to KKWD in a long time.  Top-40's not usually my cup-of-tea, but it doesn't sound like I'm missing much.  When it comes to KJ-103, I'm disappointed they run Seacrest, but, other than that, they seem to be avoiding the "Premium Choice" product that many, if not most, of the Clear Channel CHR's are running these days.  When it comes to KJ-103 v Tulsa's K-Hits, it's less that KJ is bad than K-Hits is simply incredible.  Of course, during top-40's doldrums in the early 90's, Tulsa's KAY-107 went from excellent to unlistenable while KJ-103 maintained quality programming despite the lousy music that took over the format.  KJ has aged well over the last 20 years.

Quote
And I agree with radio stations being set up to try to get the largest amount of the pie.  In OKC today, it seems like that format is classic rock. 

It does seem like everyone in the market runs some form of classic rock.  Really kinda strange.  Outside of the morning show, KRXO sounds great, but I don't remember its ratings ever being as low as they were in the last book that came out.

I'd also have KRMG and KFAQ over the two talkers in OKC.  While a lot of people have been blasting KRMG for hiring lower priced beginners and airing too much syndicated fare, KTOK and KOKC are just awful. 
« Last Edit: March 10, 2013, 12:32:56 PM by Kent » Logged
OKCRadioGuy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3013


Re: KKNG changing formats
« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2013, 01:42:52 PM »

KTOK is reliant on the reputation of 30 years ago while KOKC never even had that.  I agree.  Both are far from what I'd consider a great N/T station.  A lot of it comes from their ownership simply not wanting to invest much in them.  KTOK doesn't feel like they need to as they "win" by default while the former owner of KOKC made a clusterf#### of his attempt to launch and run one, then effectively gave up early when his FM properties started to tank (due to straining their resources due to KOKC).  KRMG still remains the best N/T in the state IMHO even if it is a shell of it's former self.
Logged
bchristi
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 302


Re: KKNG changing formats
« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2013, 03:54:10 PM »

Regardless of how big the classic rock pie is in OKC, I am hoping survival of the fittest runs its course naturally sooner rather than later. OKC doesn't need 5 classic rock stations especially when there are so many formats without a station in the market.

I also don't understand why the religious stations need to broadcast on multiple frequencies.
Logged
OKCRadioGuy
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 3013


Re: KKNG changing formats
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2013, 09:27:38 AM »

I think a lot of the reason you're hearing the God-Squad on multiple frequencies is due to the fact they are using lower-powered ways of reaching their audience like translators and rim-shots feeding them.  Commercial guys don't generally have that option.  "Non-commercial" stations do.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.255 seconds with 20 queries.