RadioDiscussions.com

 
RadioDiscussions.com Discussion Boards
Login May 21, 2013, 03:17:15 PM *
Username Password Session Length
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? Did you forget your password?
:  
   Home   Help Search Contact Us Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Translator Applications near NYC  (Read 525 times)
Shiny Knob
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 98


Re: Translator Applications near NYC
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2013, 09:13:30 PM »

The short form translator applications of 2003 were never vetted for viability. They are all merely theoretical.

In this first week of long form filings for the 700+ singletons, FCC staff have already dismissed a few that just aren't possible in the real world.

During the soon to be announced MX round, where apps are generally in more densely populated areas, an even greater percentage will bite the dust because there's simply nowhere left for them to go to avoid one another.

Many will be bought out by their MX competitor and dismissed for 'costs'. I have seen filed agreements where a couple of the Christian translator chains claim their costs to be $20,000 per app. I only wish I had gotten that kind of money to do their translator apps.

So to you many lucky people who got an application done for $1200-$2000, I say, "What a BARGAIN!"
Logged

-Keep Polishing!-
The SHINY KNOB
Shiny Knob
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 98


Re: Translator Applications near NYC
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2013, 09:19:08 PM »

Quote
I just don't get why anyone with half a brain would file a co-channel inside the 60dBu of a class B!!  102.7 and 101.9 are both class B's in NYC, with 6kW ERP from the top of the Empire State Building.

You've put your finger on it. A lot of these were, indeed, filed by people with half a brain. But I guess they were hoping for some kind of a miracle at the FCC.

And let's face it, every so often, usually with the help of a senator, somebody with half a brain gets a free pony from the FCC.
Logged

-Keep Polishing!-
The SHINY KNOB
WNTIRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1939


Re: Translator Applications near NYC
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2013, 11:56:31 PM »

And on the other side of the coin, what good would a 10 watter be in the midst of a class B signal anyway.

The applicant was Fordham University, which owns and runs WFUV in NYC.  That makes these applications even more of a mystery, as they are no stranger to radio. 

Why would someone file an impossible app only to move to a better (and viable) frequency?  Why not just apply for the more open frequency in the first place and not one that is impossible.

To those of you not familiar with NYC geography, these two apps are about a mile east-northeast of the Tappan Zee bridge.  About 22 miles north of the Empire State building and all of those class B signals.  Again, they operate a 48kW stick in the Bronx, have synchronous boosters in the city and know how to do radio.

See for yourself:

http://www.fccinfo.com/CMDProFacLookup.php?tabSearchType=Lice&sLicensee=FORDHAM+UNIVERSITY
Logged

NS Radio Engineering, Inc.
Serving NJ, NY and New England
WNTIRadio
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 1939


Re: Translator Applications near NYC
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2013, 11:59:00 PM »

Okay, I pulled up the applications and I think I figured out this mystery.  They were submitted by the "Vice President for Administration", who I'm sure has not a clue about how these things were supposed to work.  Probably thought that if he applied that 101.9 and 102.7 would be kicked off their frequencies. 

And there is no consulting engineer involved in this either. 

Still, they should have been dismissed instantly.

https://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts?context=25&appn=100647178&formid=349&fac_num=153960
Logged

NS Radio Engineering, Inc.
Serving NJ, NY and New England
Shiny Knob
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 98


Re: Translator Applications near NYC
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2013, 12:18:44 AM »

Sorry, I misunderstood your original post by assuming you wanted an answer.

Please feel free to bitch about the FCC. They deserve it.
Logged

-Keep Polishing!-
The SHINY KNOB
Kmagrill
rimember

Offline Offline

Posts: 697


Re: Translator Applications near NYC
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2013, 12:24:12 AM »

Well, I just looked at the 20030317FDX application in rfInvestigator and (as reported) the interfering contour from the translator is completely contained within the 54dBu protected contour from WFAN.  I have no idea what they were thinking.  If the FCC does not allow them to move or change channels, they're dead ducks.  Either it was a brilliant strategy that will surprise us all, or it was really dumb.  Time will tell, and pretty soon, I'd imagine.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2013, 12:26:46 AM by Kmagrill » Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP

Postings on Radiodiscussions.com are the opinions of the people who post them. Views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of Radiodiscussions.com or its owner or operator. In fact many of the views expressed here are just plain wrong. But they are opinions and this site allows us all to discuss those opinions. Any reliance on information posted is done so at the user's own risk. For a detailed look at the rules, regulations and uses of Radiodiscussions.com please see our TERMS OF SERVICE.

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.226 seconds with 19 queries.