• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

It's 2015! Time to get rid of the '70s.

There are listeners, who, throughout their lives, have heard songs from before their time and liked them. Before I got into radio I listened to a Top 40 station (in the late 60s) that did "Memory Making Weekends" and heard a lot of songs that consultants today say I should not be familiar with and therefore should not like. Wrong! Playing Herman's Hermits or The Dave Clark 5 today is much different than playing Benny Goodman or Glenn Miller in the 70s.
 
Hogwash. Our parents, the Greatest Generation, grew up in the Depression and had frugality instilled in them (for the most part, there are always a few exceptions). We Baby Boomers grew up in the affluence of the 50's and 60's, and remain big spenders (again, there are isolated exceptions). It seems that one of the biggest problem you suits have is that you can't tell the difference between a generation, which retains most of its identity as it grows older, and a demographic segment. You suits acts like when everyone reaches a certain age, they change into different people. That's ridiculous. We Baby Boomers are who we are, and even though there are some changes that come about as a result of age (like aches and pains we never anticipated) we're still the same people..

Very well stated, Avid. Now please make the rounds of the agencies on Madison Avenue with the above and convince them to loosen up some ad buys for stations with largely 55+ audiences.

This is what continues to be ignored in these threads, no matter how often it is said. If there was advertising revenue to be made from programming 50s-60s-70s oldies -- or any other format targeted at the Boomers -- we would be doing it already. But the people that pay us need the money from that advertising in order to pay us, so we're given the directive to create programming that brings in revenue.

I happen to be a Boomer myself (born in 1956) and I personally love a lot of the songs that cracked the Hot 100 in the 1960s and 1970s. But I don't program for my own personal listening, I program for a mass audience and hope to get enough listeners in the demographics that the agencies are buying ad time to reach as I can.

The problem is not the programmers, or "the suits". It is the advertising community. Go convince them.
 
Four of the songs on your list ...

Steppin' Out - Joe Jackson
One Thing Leads to Another - Fixx
Genius of Love - Tom Tom Club
Words - Missing Persons

... happen to be part of The Eighties Channel format.
 
...lot of songs that consultants today say I should not be familiar with and therefore should not like. Wrong!

Consultants generally don't make judgment calls like that.

Familiarity is not the issue in selecting songs for airplay. The key is whether the song is still a "hit" today. That means that, besides being familiar, the song is liked in the consensus view and loved by many.

I am familiar with "Big John". I even know it was a big hit. That does not mean that I like it.
 
Not only are seniors more cautious consumers, but they also have more established consumer behaviours. So to become convinced to change brands or to try a new product, it takes more advertising to convince them. Advertisers know this and often don't find the market to produce a good return on investment for radio advertising.

Again, hogwash. We Baby Boomers were a diverse bunch of people in decades past when we were the prime demographic. We're a diverse bunch of people now. Some of us have changed a little over the years, but we're still the same people. If advertisers don't recognize how valuable we are as consumers, maybe they need someone to convince them to pull their heads out of their asses!
 
Again, hogwash. We Baby Boomers were a diverse bunch of people in decades past when we were the prime demographic. We're a diverse bunch of people now. Some of us have changed a little over the years, but we're still the same people. If advertisers don't recognize how valuable we are as consumers, maybe they need someone to convince them to pull their heads out of their asses!

Advertisers know that as people mature, they tend to develop both brand preferences and greater resistance to impulse reactions to advertising. In other words, they become more skeptical on several levels.

So it takes more advertising to create a sale. More advertising costs more money. At some point, the cost of the sale exceeds the profits on the sale.

Major advertisers track sales results based on very solid analytical data that correlates with all marketing efforts. Because of that data, essentially no radio budgets are allocated against 55+.
 


Advertisers know that as people mature, they tend to develop both brand preferences and greater resistance to impulse reactions to advertising. In other words, they become more skeptical on several levels.

So it takes more advertising to create a sale. More advertising costs more money. At some point, the cost of the sale exceeds the profits on the sale.

Major advertisers track sales results based on very solid analytical data that correlates with all marketing efforts. Because of that data, essentially no radio budgets are allocated against 55+.

It's amazing how many otherwise reasonable people believe that "I don't behave that way, and none of my friends behave that way, so therefore, nearly everyone must not behave that way" is valid logic. I am nearing 60, love deep oldies, yet have managed to grasp and deal with the facts. I also am much less likely to buy on impulse, and tend to buy either the same products I've been buying for years or generic/house brand equivalents. As my income decreases, these habits will only become more dominant. I'm really not sure there is a way to make people my age and older buy anything on impulse anymore. Most of us just aren't as free-spending anymore, even if we've been conscientious savers -- after all, those saving have to be conserved for when our health becomes the major expense in our lives.
 
Okay, I did it your way. All of the songs on this playlist are from the 1960s and 1970s and peaked at #1, #2 or #3 on the Billboard Hot 100, as confirmed by the Whitburn book (as an aside, I own six of his books, covering different eras and genres of music, although I would never rely on them alone as justification to play any song, except for this experiment).

Itsy Bitsy Teenie Weenie Yellow Polkadot Bikini -- Brian Hyland
The Boll Weevil Song -- Brook Benton
A Boy Named Sue -- Johnny Cash
Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport -- Rolf Harris
My Ding-A-Ling -- Chuck Berry
Alley-Oop -- Hollywood Argyles
The Streak -- Ray Stevens
Ringo -- Lorne Greene
Disco Duck -- Rick Dees & His Cast of Idiots
Monster Mash -- Bobby "Boris" Pickett
Convoy -- C.W. McCall
Snoopy vs. the Red Baron -- Royal Guardsmen
Short People -- Randy Newman
Mr. Custer -- Larry Verne
Hello Muddah, Hello Faddah -- Allan Sherman
They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha-Haa! -- Napoleon XVI

I wonder how long it would take the listeners to start complaining if I played those songs even once per day each.
I like most of those songs.
 
And I was going to expand on some earlier posts.

Just because it is soft doesn't mean I will like it. I turn on "Weekend Edition" so I won't miss the start of "Car Talk". I was reminded yesterday I can't stand new age.

And other songs I like that aren't soft: "Jump, Jive and Wail" and "Rock This Town", both involving Brian Setzer.
 
Advertisers know that as people mature, they tend to develop both brand preferences and greater resistance to impulse reactions to advertising. In other words, they become more skeptical on several levels.

Apparently they don't realize that when the Baby Boomer generation aged, it did not follow the exact same patterns that The Greatest Generation followed when it aged. And, apparently, they're too stupid to realize that there are effective ways to exploit consumer skepticism to make it work in your favor. It also goes without saying (though I'll say it anyway) advertising to persuade someone to buy more of their favorite products actually helps sales, as does advertising to inform potential customers that your store has better prices on the brands you already want to buy.

It's amazing how many otherwise reasonable people believe that "I don't behave that way, and none of my friends behave that way, so therefore, nearly everyone must not behave that way" is valid logic. I am nearing 60, love deep oldies, yet have managed to grasp and deal with the facts. I also am much less likely to buy on impulse, and tend to buy either the same products I've been buying for years or generic/house brand equivalents. As my income decreases, these habits will only become more dominant. I'm really not sure there is a way to make people my age and older buy anything on impulse anymore. Most of us just aren't as free-spending anymore, even if we've been conscientious savers -- after all, those saving have to be conserved for when our health becomes the major expense in our lives.

Since when is persuading people to "buy on impulse" the only goal of radio advertising? I'll admit to being a little more careful in how I spend my money, so an advertisement informing me of a special sale can be very effective at convincing me to shop at a different store, or to buy something I've been wanting this week instead of waiting a few months.
 
Last edited:
And I was going to expand on some earlier posts.

Just because it is soft doesn't mean I will like it. I turn on "Weekend Edition" so I won't miss the start of "Car Talk". I was reminded yesterday I can't stand new age.

And other songs I like that aren't soft: "Jump, Jive and Wail" and "Rock This Town", both involving Brian Setzer.

Definitely a standards man. That's why this station is what you would enjoy: www.ezdoesitradio.com
 
Okay, I did it your way. All of the songs on this playlist are from the 1960s and 1970s and peaked at #1, #2 or #3 on the Billboard Hot 100, as confirmed by the Whitburn book (as an aside, I own six of his books, covering different eras and genres of music, although I would never rely on them alone as justification to play any song, except for this experiment).

Itsy Bitsy Teenie Weenie Yellow Polkadot Bikini -- Brian Hyland
The Boll Weevil Song -- Brook Benton
A Boy Named Sue -- Johnny Cash
Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport -- Rolf Harris
My Ding-A-Ling -- Chuck Berry
Alley-Oop -- Hollywood Argyles
The Streak -- Ray Stevens
Ringo -- Lorne Greene
Disco Duck -- Rick Dees & His Cast of Idiots
Monster Mash -- Bobby "Boris" Pickett
Convoy -- C.W. McCall
Snoopy vs. the Red Baron -- Royal Guardsmen
Short People -- Randy Newman
Mr. Custer -- Larry Verne
Hello Muddah, Hello Faddah -- Allan Sherman
They're Coming to Take Me Away, Ha-Haa! -- Napoleon XVI

I wonder how long it would take the listeners to start complaining if I played those songs even once per day each.

Those I would find too cheesy and be turning the station.
 
My dad's the frugal one.
My mom's the impulse collective buyer. She collects a lot of primitive crafts and snowmen.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom