But my point is they're neck & neck in San Fransisco, while KNX is a clear winner in LA.
KNBR didn't add a lot of share when they added the FM simulcast. I don't expect a big jump 6+ for KNX.
I'm a die-hard Angels fan, but I'll deal with KLAA's signal because I have no other way to listen to an audio broadcast of a game (unless I were to pay for MLB's audio stream or SiriusXM). The content is sticky. But if they moved KLAA to FM, I likely would just shift my listening to the FM signal. So it would be a 1=1 shift.
But the content is not universal. Not everyone is into sports.
Audacy's thinking with this move was likely this: It could be that some millennials and younger listeners have never even sampled KNX because of its place on the AM dial and because of the drawbacks of AM audio (i.e. poor sound quality, goes out in tunnels, etc).
And in a time where music tastes are becoming more fragmented than ever, news is somewhat universal content that may appeal to 25-54. Probably more accessible to a wider audience than sports.
So not only would there be 1=1 shifts from current listeners, but there would also be new listeners coming in, sampling KNX for the first time.
This would work better than the failed FM news experiments in New York and Chicago because current listeners of the AM station will initially form the base of the FM station, while new FM listeners are introduced into the station and folded in.
If executed correctly, there is great growth potential for Audacy.