It's not just distance, but the rising terrain as you go inland, that affects the signals. It shadows the more inland signals near the shoreline, and favors the inland cochannel and adjacent signals as you get further inland. WOMC 104.3 is grandfathered with 190000 watts ERP, and puts a lot more interference out than the 50 kW Class Bs. Because they tend conk out faster with low ERP behind hills and beyond the horizon, you may find that happening. And legacy Hancock facilities have higher ERPs than legacy Sears facilities ERPs. The low ERP of WBBM-FM vs. WLXT 96.3 Petoskey causes WLXT to dominate in airliners in the region, FAA scofflaw FM DXers report. That Eton Elite Mini would be a good choice with the lower OSC frequency if you could convince the FAA that it's totally safe. Decent sensitivity and selectivity and pocket sized.
Once, when WLS-TV 7 and WTTW 11 were still on lower towers with 316 kW ERP, they came in clear as a bell during a major tropospheric ducting event in Genesee County, MI. It was in July, 1970 I believe. WTTW was clearest due to relatively little cochannel interference, WTOL 11 vs. WXYZ-TV 7 being much closer. WGN-TV 9 was only 112 kW on Hancock Center at the time, and though there was little interference from CKLW-TV 9 and WWTV, it was third strongest of the 5 VHFs. I didn't have my Sony yet, so the only FM radio available was part of the AM/FM/TV/Turntable Cabinet.
Once, when WLS-TV 7 and WTTW 11 were still on lower towers with 316 kW ERP, they came in clear as a bell during a major tropospheric ducting event in Genesee County, MI. It was in July, 1970 I believe. WTTW was clearest due to relatively little cochannel interference, WTOL 11 vs. WXYZ-TV 7 being much closer. WGN-TV 9 was only 112 kW on Hancock Center at the time, and though there was little interference from CKLW-TV 9 and WWTV, it was third strongest of the 5 VHFs. I didn't have my Sony yet, so the only FM radio available was part of the AM/FM/TV/Turntable Cabinet.
Last edited: