• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KPCC Rebrands as LAist 89.3

So they are saying to me by this move that they are LA only and if you live in OC (like I do), that I don’t count. So this “OCist” will ignore them
Maybe this provides a marketing opening for their competitor KCRW (which, with higher power but lower elevation, has a comparable signal over most of the OC). KCRW could try to grab OC listeners offended by KPCC's new branding.
 
The article doesn't give a start date. The website doesn't reflect the change.

There's a lot of this going on in public broadcasting, getting away from traditional call letters, combining identity with other platforms beyond traditional broadcasting, as they note their potential audience is mainly online. Obviously fundraising will be done in support of the broader platform rather than transmitters & towers. A similar move was done last year with WGBH Boston.

I always have to state the obvious and the the outlier, but we will always be KSKO.... our call letters come from the river that surrounds our home town and that rivers name is part of our licensee name.

We cant rebrand with a specific river or deltas name... because we serve an area about 600 miles from one end to the other with several repeaters and branding with one specific areas local nomenclature would alienate us from other areas
 
You probably also don't have a co-owned trendy news publication. On the other hand, they don't have moose in Orange County.
Correct.. and the moose are why i no longer use rock salt on our steps
6 extended sit down visits at my FRONT DOOR in 4 days was enough for me
 
What I may be suffering is a generation gap... or just confusion with a new brand.

But...

I don't get it. The name has no warmth or feel to it. I guess it assumes that everyone living in the LA metro area feel "LA-ish" and wants to identify with the city of Los Angeles. I wonder if that is an identity that, let's say, those in Anaheim or Woodland Hills or Pasadena or any other suburb wants to assume.

This has a sound of a bunch of insiders at the organization deciding, with no research, what listeners and new media users will identify with and like. I get that they want a common identity for all the aspects of the organization but this name, to this old guy, seems kinda' cold and aloof.
Thank you, I agree.
 
More important than the branding is do they have a bureau in OC and do they ever cover news happening there?

If they don't, then it doesn't matter.
They often identify as Pasadena Los Angeles AND Orange County and have covered OC news though not on a daily basis
 
They often identify as Pasadena Los Angeles AND Orange County and have covered OC news though not on a daily basis

My take is that because public radio is dependent on the community for funding, if they start losing money from OC because the residents are offended by the branding, it will go away. Perhaps they might even change the name of the publication from "LAist" to "SoCalist."
 
Perhaps they might even change the name of the publication from "LAist" to "SoCalist."
That makes a lot of sense, particularly as it does not offend the affluent LA areas like Glendale and Pasadena (and others) that are not happy to be considered part of LA.
 
I thought folks in the OC loved elitist clubs.

I also thought public radio is viewed by some as an elitist club.
I heard "Elitist Clubs" connected to OC is usually associated to southern half of Orange County, CA like Laguna Beach, Newport Beach type areas in the past. Also its south of El Toro Y. Northern Half is different.
 
The branding seems slightly off, unless the programming is going to be modified somehow (although, the station has claimed no change). A listener tuning to a station called "LAist" is likely to expect to hear something about LA. But the on-air schedule is filled with largely the standard NPR lineup.

The blog/news site is all local (and very well-done), the radio station is mostly national content. There's a mismatch between the station and its now parent brand.
 
The branding seems slightly off, unless the programming is going to be modified somehow

The story makes it sound like the branding isn't related at all to radio programming. It's more about tying in with the co-owned news site. It would be interesting to see the traffic data on the site, since they feel that's the stronger brand. The site asks for memberships that don't include the radio station. I'd expect that to change, and make it a bundle.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom