• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

NPR temporarily stopped it's twitter accounts in a "state-media" beef with Elon Musk




 
This is an odd one unless Elon Musk has evidence that NPR and their affiliates are about to release a huge story about him that he does not want his fans to know about then this is circling allegations that are already out there with Musk.




The news outlet that really covered Elon Musk extensively is Reuters. They covered Elon Musk's lawsuits at Tesla and his cryptocurrency lawsuits.


Elon Musk has not provided a specific evidence against NPR though.
 
This is an odd one unless Elon Musk has evidence that NPR and their affiliates are about to release a huge story about him that he does not want his fans to know about then this is circling allegations that are already out there with Musk.

Elon Musk has not provided a specific evidence against NPR though.

You're overthinking it. Musk bought twitter so he could push rightwing rhetoric that aligns with his personal beliefs. He wants to transform it into a conservative social media platform.

NPR being a liberal government-funded media outlet is a favorite rightwing lie and he's amplifying that, along with a many other things through his actions on the site. Evidence is never a part of rightwing bunk.
 
You're overthinking it. Musk bought twitter so he could push rightwing rhetoric that aligns with his personal beliefs. He wants to transform it into a conservative social media platform.

NPR being a liberal government-funded media outlet is a favorite rightwing lie and he's amplifying that, along with a many other things through his actions on the site. Evidence is never a part of rightwing bunk.
True but it's AP and Reuters that has covered Elon Musk extensively with all the lawsuits. I know I said the same stuff in other places about when PBS and NPR get targeted for political rants which in reality is about CPB funding to affiliates.


 
That's an interesting question. Not sure how that would happen. A lot of NPR listeners like Tesla because they support clean energy and electric vehicles. It seems counter-productive for Musk to take a political turn when the people he's alienating are his car customers.

A lot of Tesla's customers -- or potential customers -- are exactly the type of people Musk is pushing away with his increasingly polarizing actions. Just speaking for myself, I've been researching EVs for a while thinking that's going to be my next vehicle. Tesla was pretty much at the top of my list. Now it's not a brand I would consider buying under any circumstances. I don't want to give a dime to Musk regardless of how good Teslas may be.

He has also reportedly pushed away a number of twitter advertisers who don't want to be associated with his controversies.

His desire to push his personal political views seem to be at odds with smart business decisions but it seems like he just can't help himself.

NPR really should take a stand and threaten to pull its app from Tesla.
 
Last edited:
It's about time. Here's hoping that other media companies and everybody else will follow. Reducing your information to 140 characters literally destroyed literacy here in the U.S.- both with regards to being able to articulate your message and being able to read anything longer than a few sentences. Creating Twitter was literally the worst thing Jack Dorsey could have done.
 
In perspective...Twitter was probably more valuable exposure wise to NPR than NPR being an asset to Twitter.

Maybe. Remember that the main purpose of twitter is to generate views for advertisers. NPR brings over a million followers, and posted a lot of user-generated content that brought views to twitter advertising. By stopping the posting of new content, NPR is no longer creating that user generated content that twitter needs. Is a few million views a drop in the bucket? Sure. But the more the site alienates its content creators, the less valuable its site is to advertisers.
 
In perspective...Twitter was probably more valuable exposure wise to NPR than NPR being an asset to Twitter.
Exactly. When it comes to enhanced underwriting/advertising, NPR is struggling just like every other media company. Advertising has been entering some weird ice age since 2008. NPR is in no position to cut their nose off by cutting ties with major underwriter(s).
 
It's about time. Here's hoping that other media companies and everybody else will follow. Reducing your information to 140 characters literally destroyed literacy here in the U.S.- both with regards to being able to articulate your message and being able to read anything longer than a few sentences. Creating Twitter was literally the worst thing Jack Dorsey could have done.
On the contrary, cutting to the chase with your message was a good thing (just like radio). What's bad is web articles that talk in circles and never get the point
 

Here is another one Elon Musk and Tesla is hit with a Class Action Lawsuit for Privacy violation allegations. If Elon Musk is playing the defamation claim against Reuters over questionable allegations then lets see that in one of the trials.

Elon Musk's rants against NPR has no standing what so ever. But the investigative stories Reuters have done in relation to Elon Musk then that arguement can be tried in court.


SAN FRANCISCO, April 7 (Reuters) - A California Tesla owner on Friday sued the electric carmaker in a prospective class action lawsuit accusing it of violating the privacy of customers.

The lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California came after Reuters reported on Thursday that groups of Tesla employees privately shared via an internal messaging system sometimes highly invasive videos and images recorded by customers’ car cameras between 2019 and 2022.
The lawsuit, filed by Henry Yeh, a San Francisco resident who owns Tesla's Model Y, alleges that Tesla employees were able to access the images and videos for their "tasteless and tortious entertainment" and "the humiliation of those surreptitiously recorded."

"Like anyone would be, Mr Yeh was outraged at the idea that Tesla's cameras can be used to violate his family's privacy, which the California Constitution scrupulously protects," Jack Fitzgerald, an attorney representing Yeh, said in a statement to Reuters.
 
It seems counter-productive for Musk to take a political turn when the people he's alienating are his car customers.
A lot of what Musk has done, especially once he took over Twitter, seems counter-productive to good business sense, and even common sense. Remember, Musk paid $44Bn for Twitter and as of about 3 weeks ago he said he valued it at about $20Bn at that point. That means that, by his own admission, it's worth less than 1/2 of what he paid for it not terribly long ago.
 
Remember, Musk paid $44Bn for Twitter and as of about 3 weeks ago he said he valued it at about $20Bn at that point. That means that, by his own admission, it's worth less than 1/2 of what he paid for it not terribly long ago.

In other twitter news, Musk says the old company is dead, and it's now X Corp:

 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom