• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Mike Kaplan named PD of WRFF

The mindset of most posters here....WUMB oh bad ratings with alot of good competition but making money not going anywhere, WRFF better ratings only game in town, oh they are doing poor they should flip.....and don't give me that advertiser friendly jargon
 
Will 104.5 adopt the "Two Minute Promise" where the music gets interrupted four or five times an hour for commercials, and where listeners get treated to prolonged, overbearing, heavily redundant imaging speaking to that fact at least seven or eight times hourly?

Will 104.5 hire a guy who got a 0.8 share in Minneapolis to do mornings?

Will it ignore quality new releases from core format artists and also avoid tried-and-true gold from some artists that are usually considered format staples?

(These are a few of the ways 92.3 was misprogrammed.)
 
Will 104.5 adopt the "Two Minute Promise"

I think that was more of a David Field thing than Mike Kaplan. You already know the answer to question 2 is a no.
Will it ignore quality new releases from core format artists

Trick question, since there really haven't been "quality new releases" in this format in a while.

I think Kaplan is on a short leash. Everyone at iHeart knows his weaknesses.
 
Last edited:
.....and don't give me that advertiser friendly jargon
If you mean the fact that in most markets Alternative Rock is not a favorite with major accounts and agency buys, that is a fact. Almost all alt stations get a lower share of revenue than their ratings audience share would seem to merit.
 
Last edited:
The mindset of most posters here....WUMB oh bad ratings with alot of good competition but making money not going anywhere, WRFF better ratings only game in town, oh they are doing poor they should flip.....and don't give me that advertiser friendly jargon
The mindset of most posters is a baseline understanding of business and that advertisers are the source of the cash.

Clearly not all, though.
 
The mindset of most posters is a baseline understanding of business and that advertisers are the source of the cash.

Clearly not all, though.
Although for WUMB, which has been dragged into the current conversation, you can substitute "donors" for "advertisers." And WUMB is not remotely similar to WRFF. It's an alt-country-heavy AAA station, not an alternative rocker.
 
Why keep trying to help him understand? We’ve said these things over and over, and he is obviously choosing to ignore facts so he can instead keep repeating the same baseless drivel. Choose mental health. I’m blocking him.
 
Last edited:
Although for WUMB, which has been dragged into the current conversation, you can substitute "donors" for "advertisers." And WUMB is not remotely similar to WRFF. It's an alt-country-heavy AAA station, not an alternative rocker.

I think the previous poster meant WUMR which is a low rated Spanish CHR in Philly. Posters here cite that station a lot because it replaced The Breeze.
 
Although for WUMB, which has been dragged into the current conversation, you can substitute "donors" for "advertisers." And WUMB is not remotely similar to WRFF. It's an alt-country-heavy AAA station, not an alternative rocker.
He wasn’t even referring to WUMB. He rails pointlessly (and without the benefit of common sense) against WUMR, but he apparently can’t even type the actual letters sometimes.
 
I think that was more of a David Field thing than Mike Kaplan. You already know the answer to question 2 is a no.

I'm a bit surprised by that remark only because that seems to be a little too technical of a programming detail for the CEO of the whole company to involve himself.

That said, it wouldn't shock me completely if that was Field's call since one could argue that was more of a sales strategy than programming strategy.
 
That said, it wouldn't shock me completely if that was Field's call since one could argue that was more of a sales strategy than programming strategy.

Here's an interview with Field from almost 10 years ago in which he explains the 2-minute promise:


“In June, we relaunched The End, our alternative station in Seattle, with a unique new business model. The End features the industry’s first 2 Minute Promise, limiting commercials to 6 minutes per hour and never more than 2 minutes at a time. We were also revising The End’s advertising model, focusing on a 360-degree millennial integration program, enabling customers to reach The End’s valuable and hard-to-reach audience across our digital, radio and experiential platforms […] While it is still early, initial response from listeners, both directly and across social media, has been outstanding.”
 
Kaplan was not the reason Alt 92.3 failed. The first few months under Michael Martin's leadershup were misguided musically and presentation-wise.

You can arguably blame KROQ on him, but how much of it was him being made to be the scapegoat for decisions above him (ie letting go of Kevin, Allie & Jensen and how it was done) depends on who you ask. Prior to this run at Audacy, every Alternative station he ran over-performed.

Will 104.5 adopt the "Two Minute Promise" where the music gets interrupted four or five times an hour for commercials, and where listeners get treated to prolonged, overbearing, heavily redundant imaging speaking to that fact at least seven or eight times hourly?

Will 104.5 hire a guy who got a 0.8 share in Minneapolis to do mornings?
Kaplan developed the two-minute promise during his first run at Entercom at 107.7 The End where it helped grow the ratings immensely.

He's not making a morning show change. He was the one who brought the Woody Show to KYSR Los Angeles and built it into something iHeart could syndicate nationally. He and Woody worked together at Nassau Broadcasting in New Jersey in the early/mid-90s.

Under John Allers, WRFF succeeded because "Radio 104.5" continued the tradition in the market set by WPLY of having a Pop Alternative lean making it more female or office friendly than most Alternative stations in the country. When he was let go and it was rebranded as "Alt 104.5", it was put more in line with the rest of the company's stations in the format. Kaplan has done both variations of the format during his career and the company obviously sees that WRFF needs a stronger leader by bringing him in, so watching the music and imaging will be the key to whether he's being given enough control to make the station more sellable again.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom