• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Audacy bankruptcy could occur by month's end

Payment grace periods of the sort described in this article are generally 30 days.

If payment is not made, forbearance is not granted, or an out of court restructure is not implemented by the end of the payment grace period, Audacy will have no choice but to file BK.

 
Payment grace periods of the sort described in this article are generally 30 days.

If payment is not made, forbearance is not granted, or an out of court restructure is not implemented by the end of the payment grace period, Audacy will have no choice but to file BK.

The majority of people on this board were thinking BK was not going to be considered for a couple years. Maybe Audacy sees some window to get a re-negotiation with this group of lenders sooner rather than later. They certainly have the 18 million in cash available to make the payment.
 
If payment is not made, forbearance is not granted, or an out of court restructure is not implemented by the end of the payment grace period, Audacy will have no choice but to file BK.

I had the same thought. Bankruptcy might not be a given, but that's exactly what Cumulus did in the run up to its bankruptcy.
 
I don't know where you get the impression from this article there is bankruptcy involved. It just says they're renegotiating their debt with lenders. Click bait intended?
I've represented creditor interests as lender in multiple corporate bankruptcies. My comment is based on my professional knowledge of how the process works including the period leading up to bankruptcy.

You seem like a smart fella. You think the company is actually going to come right out and say "yeah, we're probably going to file BK in a month" before having all of its ducks in a row? Give me a break.

Any payment made now to unsecured debt holders would be at risk of being disgorged because of preference period regulations under Chapter 11.
 
I've represented creditor interests as lender in multiple corporate bankruptcies. My comment is based on my professional knowledge of how the process works.

You seem like a smart fella. You think the company is actually going to come right out and say "yeah, we're probably going to file BK in a month" before having all of its ducks in a row? Give me a break.
Then why in the subject line did you include it?
 
The company's actions are a tell tale sign a filing is very possible within 30 days, that's why.

Is it a certainty? No.

I suggest reading some financial news reports over the next day or two on this matter. You'll see I'm hardly alone in my view.
 
The thing about it is that it's not as though they don't have the $18 million. They have more than $18 million in cash on hand.

Here's a link to a similar story from 2018 and iHeart skipping a payment:


It took a couple of months, and here's what happened:

 
What is their quarterly unlevered cash burn rate?

That $18 million figure needs context.

Non performance of unsecured debt payments inside the preference period window is standard practice in these situations.

(Edit: kudos to BigA for posting the iHM reports pertaining to a similar decision they made before entering Chapter 11. Their case was not a true pre-pack, however. Their case was actually rather messy. They were in BK court for twelve months )
 
Last edited:
The company's actions are a tell tale sign a filing is very possible within 30 days, that's why.

Is it a certainty? No.

I suggest reading some financial news reports over the next day or two on this matter. You'll see I'm hardly alone in my view.
I get it, you have some bone to pick with Audacy. No need to read between those lines. Sorry to harsh your buzz; but just because they're trying to renegotiate debt, doesn't mean they are somehow circling the drain. If they made the $18M payment as scheduled, they would have given up the negotiation ground.
As BigA pointed out; all indications are that Audacy has enough cash on hand to make that payment.
 
I get it, you have some bone to pick with Audacy. No need to read between those lines. Sorry to harsh your buzz; but just because they're trying to renegotiate debt, doesn't mean they are somehow circling the drain. If they made the $18M payment as scheduled, they would have given up the negotiation ground.
As BigA pointed out; all indications are that Audacy has enough cash on hand to make that payment.
You are such a condescending troll.

No one is suggesting the company will cease to exist. I am suggesting there is a decent likelihood they will use Chapter 11 to reorganize, just as a number of other broadcasting companies have done.

It is unclear to me why you find that suggestion so offensive.
 
You are such a condescending troll.
Ah, resorting to name-calling now eh?
No one is suggesting the company will cease to exist. I am suggesting there is a decent likelihood they will use Chapter 11 to reorganize, just as a number of other broadcasting companies have done.
And time will tell whether you're right. Are you denying that you just made the off-the-cuff assumption right in the subject line, with nothing in what you posted actually indicating bankruptcy is imminent?
It is unclear to me why you find that suggestion so offensive.
I find your promoting struggles with the financial situation at Audacy disturbing. What, did you get canned from an Audacy property?
 
So I'm not allowed to talk about any publicly traded broadcaster's financial struggles here?

Who the hell made you the traffic cop?

My subject line is perfectly reasonable given the situation at hand. Nowhere did I suggest they are out of money or headed for liquidation. What I am suggesting is a reorganization in Chapter 11 to strengthen the balance sheet is quite possible.

I do think there is a better than even money chance they'll file Chapter 11 within 30 days. I may be right or wrong on the timing.

I see no convincing reason as of yet why Audacy will be able to avoid a Chapter 11. Cumulus and iHM both had to go thru an 11.
 
I see no convincing reason as of yet why Audacy will be able to avoid a Chapter 11. Cumulus and iHM both had to go thru an 11.

However, the CEOs of Cumulus and iHeart didn't own 30% of their companies. This is a very different situation. A company goes into Chap 11 when it seeks protection, and it's willing to turn the company over to the court. I don't think that's where Field is.
 
This is an interesting and topical subject, and I don't want to close it due to differences of opinion. Please avoid the "personal" aspect of different opinions
 
However, the CEOs of Cumulus and iHeart didn't own 30% of their companies. This is a very different situation. A company goes into Chap 11 when it seeks protection, and it's willing to turn the company over to the court. I don't think that's where Field is.
Good point, and one where a partial exchange of debt for partial equity and a refinancing of the remaining debt becomes the first option for the Fields.
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom