I’m not talking music. I’m talking presentation. Broadway Bill Lee comes to mind since this is the NYC forum.That's total mythology. After the payola scandal of the 1950s, radio stations took music decisions out of the hands of DJs.
I’m not talking music. I’m talking presentation. Broadway Bill Lee comes to mind since this is the NYC forum.That's total mythology. After the payola scandal of the 1950s, radio stations took music decisions out of the hands of DJs.
Wouldn't they want to advertise their donation if that was the case? That type of stuff would tend to be public...Whether the Allen Foundation was the specific donor who helped KEXP acquire KREV/92.7 here in SF last year, that I don't know.
I can only see two formats working in NY: Spanish Tropical/CHR and Regional Mexican.If anything, New York is underserved when it comes to Spanish stations, compared with Miami and LA, at least.
A new programmer's best shot at launching a successful Spanish station in New York
We're assuming that another LMA could also be possible, right?It's not up to the programmer. It's up to the owner. Right now we don't know who that is. So any other discussion is useless.
We're assuming that another LMA could also be possible, right?
We don't know who the programmer/owner might be yet, but an LMA is always possible too.With who?
If Jeff wants out, and his investors want out, once and for all to cash out, the answer is no. Very unlikely. Doing still another LMA defeats all thoseWe don't know who the programmer/owner might be yet, but an LMA is always possible too.
We don't know who the programmer/owner might be yet, but an LMA is always possible too.
Smulyan's duty is to maximize value for his shareholders. If that means an LMA, it cannot be ruled out completely. It might even increase the value for a buyer...That's what the article in the OP said. But we also know that the seller needs the cash to buy out his stockholders. There is a time limit on his agreement with the stockholders. He has three years to do it, and he said in September that he wants to do it quickly.
Smulyan's duty is to maximize value for his shareholders. If that means an LMA, it cannot be ruled out completely.
When the lease ends with ESPN New York on Aug. 31, Emmis can sell or lease the signal to someone else.
To sell it outright, Emmis is looking for an offer in the $50 million range, according to sources.
And since that article was written the advertising picture for radio has grown even grimmer, with few signs of recovery. With that in mind, wouldn't it be prudent for Smulyan to accept any bid that comes somewhere close to the asking price, since any bids that come in a month or two later will be for even less money?As I said, that's what the article in the OP said a year ago.
With that in mind, wouldn't it be prudent for Smulyan to accept any bid that comes somewhere close to the asking price
Maybe he’s waiting for this thread to reach 1,000 posts. 🤪Looking at all of his other asset sales, he's moved quickly. He's not someone to hem & haw. I believe he's already agreed to a sale, and they're waiting for the best opportunity to announce. He has a tenant in the property now, so there's no rush to announce the next occupant.
I agree.My assumption had been that if Emmis had a buyer, it would've been announced by June 30 so that closing was timed around the time the LMA ended.
At this point the likelihood of filler programming ala what Merlin did with 101.9 between the end of FM News and the sale to CBS in 2012 is more and more possible.
I wonder if this is a case of lack of interested parties or if it's a case of Emmis refusing to budge sufficiently on price - assuming the above theory is true?
So we can put the idea of Good Karma extending their LMA or emerging as the buyer in the "not happening" category.In the meantime, the current occupant is starting to convert its listeners to the other platforms.
So we can put the idea of Good Karma extending their LMA or emerging as the buyer in the "not happening" category.
Radio is in decline in large part because newer technologies have given audiences new places to wander.I seriously doubt it will cheer up BLA. What most of these posters really mean is that there is no format that appeals to their specific taste at any given moment in time. They also assume (incorrectly) that because they like something at that given moment, then of course almost everyone else must also like it. So, therefore, radio is in decline because the "suits" don't get it.
This is, of course, absurd. But years of reading similar posts seem to follow this thread.
Radio is in decline in large part because newer technologies have given audiences new places to wander.