We all heard that President Joe Biden is no longer running for President. It was a great 4-year run as a president. It was a historic day.
Here in Phoenix, KPNX (NBC) since leaving the Brickyard 400, before it actually ended wanting to get ET/CT straight to news, has been covering the local aspect of the Biden news with Jonathan McCall & political analyst Brahm Resnik as well as local politicians coming on. KPHO (CBS) & KNXV (ABC) took a break since their network's coverage ended, but are now showing the primetime live specials that are airing, makes sense especially for CBS with the 2nd half of Face The Nation scheduled to air at 4:30. And of course, they're doing this while there's a Dust Storm warning in effect for the area!!He wasn't eliminated. He quit, like LBJ in 1968.
As far as TV coverage went, Fox and NBC were airing regular programming when I turned it on at 1:30 PM PT. ABC covered the story until 2, and CBS stayed with it until 3.
Not just the President of the United States.I see a lot of posts here about the future of radio, but what does it say about traditional media when the President of the United States chooses social media as the only way of announcing a major decision?
Nevertheless, there is plenty to cover. It's obviously a major story. Biden has chosen not to seek another term as President. The pundits will unpack the whys and wherefores for several months.This is a story that was initiated on social media. No radio or TV announcement. No press conference. No video. No opportunity to do actual journalism with the person involved. People are asking about radio & TV coverage, but to be honest, the subject of the story completely bypassed traditional media. A lot of TV channels are doing ''live breaking news coverage,'' but there's really nothing to cover.
I see a lot of posts here about the future of radio, but what does it say about traditional media when the President of the United States chooses social media as the only way of announcing a major decision?
It means the concept of "free media" - as in getting coverage gratis in return for giving up some control over the message - is less relevant and needs to be deployed less often. It hasn't disappeared altogether, because the traditional media still have the patina of added credibility, though even that isn't a widely held perception any more.I see a lot of posts here about the future of radio, but what does it say about traditional media when the President of the United States chooses social media as the only way of announcing a major decision?
Interesting point. I also thought about News/Talkers running reruns of syndicated programming that was all suddenly outdated.This is a story that was initiated on social media. No radio or TV announcement. No press conference. No video. No opportunity to do actual journalism with the person involved. People are asking about radio & TV coverage, but to be honest, the subject of the story completely bypassed traditional media. A lot of TV channels are doing ''live breaking news coverage,'' but there's really nothing to cover.
I see a lot of posts here about the future of radio, but what does it say about traditional media when the President of the United States chooses social media as the only way of announcing a major decision?
An interesting parallel that I saw on one of the mainstream sites (possibly Politico) was in regard to Tom Eagleton's exit from the Democratic ticket as VP (George McGovern was the presidential candidate) in 1972. That was announced on July 31, even later in the campaign than Biden's decision. (LBJ made his announcement in January 1968, kicking off a turbulent year, to say the least.) The only good thing to come out of the Eagleton controversy over his medical treatment for depression was that Missouri ended up with an excellent senator for another 14 years. Then he retired, and was a regular political commentator on KSDK(TV) in St. Louis.The title of this thread is ridiculous. It sounds like "Biden was eliminated from NFL playoff contention". The President has chosen not to seek a second term. Lyndon Johnson did this in 1968. The circumstances were different, but this is similar.
That would require a Constitutional amendment. No way would 2/3 of both houses of Congress agree to it. Nor would 38 states agree to ratify it.Now might be a good time for the media to suggest that no one over age 70 should be eligible to run for President...
I didn't even bother to listen to the ones in Denver. It all would have been secondhand material anyway, and the ideological perspectives of the stations here range from R to R.Interesting point. I also thought about News/Talkers running reruns of syndicated programming that was all suddenly outdated.
KPHO after airing the one-hour primetime CBS Special Report aired only the first half of the special one hour CBS Evening News opting to air local news at 5:30. And ICYW, out West, they are showing 60 Minutes, although assuming the episodes this time of year, despite calling it on listings as "New", it's just a recycling of past stories being shown.Here in Phoenix, KPNX (NBC) since leaving the Brickyard 400, before it actually ended wanting to get ET/CT straight to news, has been covering the local aspect of the Biden news with Jonathan McCall & political analyst Brahm Resnik as well as local politicians coming on. KPHO (CBS) & KNXV (ABC) took a break since their network's coverage ended, but are now showing the primetime live specials that are airing, makes sense especially for CBS with the 2nd half of Face The Nation scheduled to air at 4:30. And of course, they're doing this while there's a Dust Storm warning in effect for the area!!
Of course it won't happen. We already know why.That would require a Constitutional amendment. No way would 2/3 of both houses of Congress agree to it. Nor would 38 states agree to ratify it.
Newsom is not eligible, presuming it is Harris at the top of the ticket. The Constitution states in the 12th Amendment that the President and VP cannot represent the same state. VP Harris currently represents California, and Gov. Newsom is obviously the sitting governor of California.The California one I am familiar with given that its the home state of the VP and lots of the national press will put lots of attention on Newsom given that he is an ally of the VP going back to the time Newsom was mayor of San Francisco and VP Harris was the San Francisco DA in the 2000's.
Michigan governor might be the favor to win the VP nomination.Yes for the TV Apps I got a notification on Youtube via the major Networks breaking news feed. I got this and live updates from Ap and Reuters over who the candidates for Democrat VP is going to be named in rumors as in this list. Expect the national press to surround multiple state capitals given that the preliminary list for VP candidate includes governors. The California one I am familiar with given that its the home state of the VP and lots of the national press will put lots of attention on Newsom given that he is an ally of the VP going back to the time Newsom was mayor of San Francisco and VP Harris was the San Francisco DA in the 2000's.