While several reasons are offered to justify this, it's clearly another way for Trump to harm news organizations. The vast majority of spots on TV network newscasts is made up of Big Pharma ads, and they're also major sponsors on the cable news channels. Any sweeping restrictions on those ads would cause financial pain for commercial broadcasters giving Trump new leverage over all of them.
Sounds more like an effort to restrict "Big Pharma" which is one of the Secretary of Health's top agenda items.This right here. To me this seems like the primary motivation... to cut into revenue for television networks.
While it can be restricted rather easily on broadcast TV, this might still be an option for streams and even cable channels.I imagine most of this advertising money won't disappear though and will probably just get switched to online advertising.
That kind of switch might actually bring more eyes back to broadcast TV.While it can be restricted rather easily on broadcast TV, this might still be an option for streams and even cable channels.
I've seen social media posts and graphics to this effect "Starve the fake (non-Trump) news by banning pharmaceutical ads"This right here. To me this seems like the primary motivation... to cut into revenue for television networks.
I imagine most of this advertising money won't disappear though and will probably just get switched to online advertising.
Why do you think that banning pharma ads is going to make broadcast TV more appealing? The annoying pharma ads will just be replaced by annoying ads for something else.That kind of switch might actually bring more eyes back to broadcast TV.
Do food and restaurant companies warn you about the consequences of poor diet?
All good points.Why do you think that banning pharma ads is going to make broadcast TV more appealing? The annoying pharma ads will just be replaced by annoying ads for something else.
If the broadcast networks take a major revenue hit due to the banning of pharma ads it could mean the quality of programming could go down…driving away more audience.
Much of the loathing for pharma advertising on TV is due to the length of the commercials, which is due to all the side effect warnings that have to be included. But do other types of businesses give you similar warnings? Do auto manufacturers warn you that you could be injured or killed in an accident? Do food and restaurant companies warn you about the consequences of poor diet? Do the recruiting ads for the military warn you that you could be maimed or killed in a war?
I'm going to the beach next week which means I can't skip over these ads when watching TV.
Sounds like if the acupuncturist stopped advertising, the station would feel the pinch!Also related to my beach trip, a DJ interviewed the acupuncturist who helped him and they talked about this topic. Somewhere he learned that these commercials make up 4 percent of ad time but 8 percent of revenue.