I always said HD was just a translator feeder and not much else. Streaming has always had far more going for it technically. That's why I always saw streaming, not HD, as radio's future.
That's about all it's good for, and even then, it's very limited because, while most people have HD radios in their cars at this point, many of those people probably don't know how to work said HD radios, and those who do probably prefer to stream instead.
And it is horrifying to watch. But the writing was on the wall 20 years ago. The public wants high-tech, not a quaint old radio dial. The market has spoken
I've been reading the occasional article here and there about a small but growing group of outlier Gen Zers and Millennials who are trying hard to go back to the quaintness of an old radio dial. They're growing quite tired of the invasive and relentless reach of modern tech.
xperi hasn't exactly helped themselves with it's royalty scam. And since there are very few home/portables with HD and cars bailing out of HD, they're going to have to either give that up and start making (gasp!) relevant things or go under. That HD cow has done been milked to dust.
I've never understood all the specifics, but they're just doing what VC does. Most of them actually end up failing sooner or later, and excessive greed and hubris are likely among the main reasons why. The ones with good business sense are the ones that survive and become huge juggernauts like Apple, Google and Meta (aka Facebook).
If the auto makers don't want HD, xperi is in big trouble. Because the radio stations don't want it if they can't semi-profitably run analog translators with it with terrestrial analog FM radio itself vanishing altogether from new/late model cars.
So far, only Tesla has made an effort to remove analog FM, and even then only on an entry model. For what it's worth, most other manufacturers (certainly the domestic ones, along with many of the Japanese makers) still include FM
and AM in their radios, at least for now, so analog isn't going away yet.
But fair warning: The new radio replacement they're coming up with is much worse.
Indeed.
You ever go into Walgreens for a green tea and you can't find it because every cooler door has a video ad for something else running on it across the entire door? Imagine the distraction when a big, loud, visual ad suddenly pops up on your entertainment center screen. Especially for a product/service you will never want or need. That will get very old, very fast. So I hope the car industry is planning an opt-out because I really don't see the public reacting well to that.
I haven't seen those "video ad-enabled" coolers in the wild yet, and I hope I never do.
And seriously, people are REALLY tired of the 360° advertising bombardment of life as it is now. Seeing it in their cars isn't going to sit as well as the ad agencies, tech companies and car makers think. Because people see their cars as their personal spaces. And the ads (especially if there is no direct way of shutting them off) will become invasive. Audio advertising is more subtle by comparison. You can change the station, turn down/off the volume, play MP3s/CDs, whatever to tune them out. What's the escape hatch here? Especially when you and your date are having a moment? Or if you have important guests you don't want to embarrass yourself in front of with your car uncontrollably flashing ads for AM/PM hot dogs.
Agreed.
On my computer, I run an ad blocker,
two tracker blockers, and a javascript blocker. This takes care of 90% of ads, and I'm always astonished by how many ads there are when I turn it all off or use a browser that isn't set up yet.
The ad agencies aren't going to invest in a system that doesn't put their messages in front of the driver at all times. Or trigger the video screens in the back seat to show toy or fast food commercials. So I expect the worst from it first before legislation straightens it out.
And what's to keep auto manufacturers from having in house ad agencies, radio channels and content makers of their own? They got their buyers complete financials, personal data, address, etc.
They probably won't do it in house any more than they already do (for marketing, etc.), but I can totally see them partnering up with some big ad agencies and selling information to them for a good profit boost.
And there's noting to stop them from doing that, either.
I have a Samsung TV that defaults to its own streaming network menu options when you turn it on. I have to thumb for the HDMI connection my cable is on. That's very possible in this environment too.
When i moved and got a new cable company (Mediacom), I learned that everyone's moving over to IPTV – traditional linear TV carried as a stream over the internet. I have to say that it's not that great. It's been better lately, but in general, it's unreliable, it's always stuttering with movement that isn't smooth, suggesting dropped frames and/or a refresh rate mismatch, and if we leave it on for more than a couple hours, it goes into a standby mode, requiring that we press OK on the remote to bring it back.
I miss good old analog TV. You turned it on, set the channel you wanted, and it would just play until you change the channel or turned it off (or, perhaps, the station signed off). None of this standby nonsense.
And while the UI for simply
changing the channel is quite clunky and difficult to use, the UI for buying pay-per-view movies and on demand streaming services has been made frightfully easy to use by accident.
And it's going to be a problem for everybody if the on-board advertising system works better than anything else in the car.
That is awful, and I'm not looking forward to it.
Unfortunately, if all that highly invasive in-car advertising can't be turned off or even muted, what can one do? Trade it in for a used model? Crash the car into a ditch and walk away in disgust?
Because they're more likely to spend without asking questions or doing research.
I think it's foolish to spend money you don't have, regardless of whether you're a college student or retiree.
This is one of the reasons why credit card debt loads have reached crisis levels.
How effective is advertising in your buying process?
Not very. I ignore most of them.
Remember, HD was pushed by broadcasters who were very concerned about "digital" audio back in the era when CDs and DVDs made that a buzzword. Bell Labs, among others, looked for a digital answer for that concern as a way of making money. When Bell was chopped up, the development of what became "HD Radio" was sold to a startup that got venture capital and investments from major broadcasters.
OK.
The model was always based on creating technology and licensing it to both broadcasters and radio set makers. It was never a "scam".
Much of what is permissible under corporate law – which also governs VC – is perfectly legal, but it isn't necessarilly ethical. That said, while I don't know much about Xperi's practices, from what I do know, even though it doesn't technically qualify as a "scam" by law, it is still not particularly ethical.
How else except royalties could Xperi make money when they did not make radios or own radio stations? For the first 20 years of FM, all radios with that band had to pay royalties to Major Armstrong's company.
I agree that they do need to make their money *somehow,* but it's important to be fair and not make their royalties unfairly expensive. The FM royalties are another case in point. Were those royalties fair?
How many brands and what share of the market are eliminating FM? As far as I know, just the low end Tesla (made as a come-on to get people into the dealer and not to be sold in quantities).
Yes, as I said earlier, only some Low-end Teslas are getting their FM radios removed. I also heard on the radio the other day (on AM, inceidentally), that Tesla will be adopting Apple CarPlay, so maybe they're using that to incentivise customers away from using FM so that they can quietly remove it across their entire line eventually?
c