• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

1110 New Format

It's a programming placeholder with NO intention of seeking out advertisers.
And it takes months to build up sales even a little bit. I recall putting my first station on the air years ago and for 7 months we billed less than $50 a month!
 
When Steve Jobs introduced the iPod in 2001 we all became 'outliers'. I know folks my age who never listen to radio. That is because no radio station can play all the songs by a person's favorite artist. You can do all the research you want. You are just rearranging the deck chairs on a sinking ship.

The iPod wasn't what did it. While iTunes made personal audio devices easy enough that even technological illiterates could use them, they still required work and still required paying for the music. The difference makers were actually the arrival of the streaming services and mobile data becoming ubiquitous and affordable. At some level, radio will always exist; it just won't be AM and FM frequencies and transmitters forever. I don't expect that change to happen in the near future, but broadcasting conventions have been showing off technology that made transmitters look bound for the scrapheap for about the last 25 years. When it finally hits, nobody will have any serious excuse for saying they didn't know it was coming.
 
I can hardly wait for the Jan book to come out. ~Feb 26 i guess. What will 1110's share be? and the cume?
OR... might they have turned off the Nielsen PPP encoder for 1110?
 
Using Old Time Radio as a filler format would be completely different, would possibly put 1110 back on the consciousness of the Charlotte populace and maybe get some press attention, and that could test a concept with possibly very little money? Are we SURE that Entertainment Radio wouldn't be a decent temporary format?

I know what I am SURE of, and that is: Every suggestion you make about programming is something whose time has long since passed.

Please, try to understand what we have been replying to you with. Unless a format can get enough listeners to make it viable for ad sales, no station owner is going to try it. It seems everything that you would like to hear would have an audience that is entirely 65+, which is the least saleable demo. (By any chance, are you in that demographic?)

And at this point, I don't think Radio One is looking here for suggestions, anyway.
 
I think we're forgetting what a filler format is.

It's a programming placeholder with NO intention of seeking out advertisers. it doesn't matter you put on, but simply to keep the signal on the air with something listenable (gregorian chants if you want), instead of silence, which is a sure way to kill off a radio station for good. Silence=Death.

I have been known to run an electronic "tick tock" clock 24/7 (except for the TOH legals) for several days if management really wanted to blow off the existing audience before a format flip. It's technically listenable but not much better than a dead carrier.
 
I know folks my age who never listen to radio. That is because no radio station can play all the songs by a person's favorite artist. You can do all the research you want. You are just rearranging the deck chairs on a sinking ship.

Radio is not for people who are insistent on a playlist consisting of every song by only their favorite artists, regardless of chart position or overall mass appeal. Your anecdotal observation is simply that: Even people who keep their MP3 players as their primary music source will listen to some radio, because we have adapted to being a "consensus favorites" medium.

When someone listens to the radio, they expect to hear some of their favorites, but not all of them, and they expect that the rest of the music is at least palatable to them.

I am offended, as a programmer, by the "sinking ship" remark and request a retraction and apology. It comes dangerously close to violating the rule here about personal attacks.
 
Oh, for the record, I've just 'bout given up on chasing this thread down, just responding to things when I see 'em.
 
The iPod wasn't what did it.
Long before the iPod we had the Walkman which did the same thing with less sophisticated technology... and the need to carry a lot of cassettes with us.
While iTunes made personal audio devices easy enough that even technological illiterates could use them, they still required work and still required paying for the music.
Or recording it off the radio or from a friend's copy.
The difference makers were actually the arrival of the streaming services and mobile data becoming ubiquitous and affordable. At some level, radio will always exist; it just won't be AM and FM frequencies and transmitters forever.
The idea of curated playlists, delevered with whatever is the best technology, has its place, just as the video streamers have ad-free and ad content service.
I don't expect that change to happen in the near future, but broadcasting conventions have been showing off technology that made transmitters look bound for the scrapheap for about the last 25 years. When it finally hits, nobody will have any serious excuse for saying they didn't know it was coming.
I really think that "radio" means any system of audio delivery in real time... maybe even "on demand" shows and podcasts not in real time. There will be some form (or forms) of audio delivery well into the predictable future.
 
One of my many friends in the business is Howard Hoffman, who was part of the team that produced that parody. On his birthday one year, I created an obviously fake (but close enough for the parody) license for WVWA Poundridge. He loved it.
RD's Scott Fybush even documented the history of the legendary WVWA. For the unitiated, please note the date for this Tower Site of the Week.

Site of the Week April 1: WVWA, Pound Ridge
 


I didn't put two and two together, 'til I saw K.M.'s post with yours. So that's what it was called! I believe I heard at least part of it, on an old edition of the now-defunct DX Audio Service. I used to love that mag and looked forward each month, to that tape hitting my mailbox.
 
One of my many friends in the business is Howard Hoffman, who was part of the team that produced that parody. On his birthday one year, I created an obviously fake (but close enough for the parody) license for WVWA Poundridge. He loved it.


LOL! I'll have to see if I can find that spoof anywhere.
 
LOL! I'll have to see if I can find that spoof anywhere.

You won't find it online. I shared it with Howard privately to avoid anyone claiming I was trying to deliberately forge a FCC authorization. After all, it was a birthday present.
 


Back
Top Bottom