The audience is there, they're just not sticking around.
Could be they have other things to do besides listen to the radio.
The audience is there, they're just not sticking around.
It matters if someone is there to listen at the time the advertiser wants their ad to air.
Have you seen many examples of an advertiser demanding that their ad appear at a specific time? In one specific example, I worked with an advertiser who purchased a package, but wanted most of their ads to air at a very specific time of the day. As I recall, they were hoping to capture parents driving their kids to school. Therefore, there was extra focus on airing these ads at the times this behavior would be expected.The ads are scheduled in a way that recognizes the short listening patterns. That means the same ads are aired many times, perhaps in every break.
This statement is indicative of today's radio in general. There are just too many media choices (TV, podcasts, videos, etc.) out there these days.Could be they have other things to do besides listen to the radio.
This statement is indicative of today's radio in general. There are just too many media choices (TV, podcasts, videos, etc.) out there these days.
Whether or not this is correct I have no idea, but it's my understanding that advertisers can pick a daypart in some cases but not more than that. That was not my experience when an organization I was involved with was buying spots on a local station, but we were paying the lowest rate they had. I would imagine you're going to have to pay for that extra flexibility. We just told the station what days we wanted our spot to air and they aired on those days.Have you seen many examples of an advertiser demanding that their ad appear at a specific time? In one specific example, I worked with an advertiser who purchased a package, but wanted most of their ads to air at a very specific time of the day. As I recall, they were hoping to capture parents driving their kids to school. Therefore, there was extra focus on airing these ads at the times this behavior would be expected.
Hank, Jack and Emma are all jukeboxes. And Emma does target a prime demo. But is it really working as well as planned?Jack and Hank are both jukeboxes that have no talent costs. Jack is not going anywhere. And I would think Lotus is OK with Hank given the other two country outlets have to cost more to produce. Emma is targeting a primo demo, so the numbers we see may not tell the story very well. I suspect The Sound skewed far too old for them to sell well.
Good question, but remember that the panel generally changes around 4% to 5% monthly, with the "Holiday" period sometimes being a bit higher. So for a major shift base on panel, it would take at least 6 to 8 months... and remember that Nielsen has a flexible policy of distributing non HDHA and HDBA meters within a county based on population distribution.HChristian radio is doing well all of a sudden here. And while there historically have been spikes, WHAT triggered this? Must be a new panel from the more religious enclaves of this area ....
KCMS has never been #1 in the overall ratings in Seattle. KCMS' best book in 1985 was the winter survey, when it was 17th with a 2.6 share.Elsewhere; KCMS is #2 with their best since 1985 (when they were #1 for a book)
We were told the same thing when Audacy launched similarly-formatted Bella here in Portland. They're both cut from the same mold. When that station launched, it was completely jockless, not that its predecessor was much more staffed. That station had lost its morning show at the end of the previous year, and with the change the PD moved to afternoons on the country station until he was let go. The former Buzz was jockless the rest of the time. When Bella launched, we were told that a new lineup would be coming soon, but it never did and the station was flipped to sports this last summer.Hank, Jack and Emma are all jukeboxes. And Emma does target a prime demo. But is it really working as well as planned?
Coulda sworn the Emma launch PR sheet mentioned a yet to be seen/defined "lifestyle" brand tie-in with Emma. And since one can custom brand anything from tablet computers to TV dinners, one could imagine what all of that would look like in Emmaworld. But 94.1 seems really all over the place. Spanning four decades from '90s Spice Girls/Shania Twain songs to Sabrina Carpenter. But I also notice KSWD seems to be repeating some of the same mistakes that KPLZ made as Star 101.5. But I guess that comes with Hot AC when you're playing second-ran to KRWM.
Elsewhere; KCMS is #2 with their best since 1985 (when they were #1 for a book) But don't call it revival just yet. KCMS has bumps now and then in 6+. But always swings back to the middle. Christian radio is doing well all of a sudden here. And while there historically have been spikes, WHAT triggered this? Must be a new panel from the more religious enclaves of this area ....
There’s a few approaches that you can take with advertising. As someone else already mentioned, scattering the ads across the entire 24 hour clock is a safe strategy if you want to reach every listener, even if they listen for short periods of time. The opposite would be targeting specific times where you want the ad to run.Whether or not this is correct I have no idea, but it's my understanding that advertisers can pick a daypart in some cases but not more than that. That was not my experience when an organization I was involved with was buying spots on a local station, but we were paying the lowest rate they had. I would imagine you're going to have to pay for that extra flexibility. We just told the station what days we wanted our spot to air and they aired on those days.
Hip hopMy take on that is the Emma flip was based on demographics. The audience might be smaller, but more sellable. If broadcasters were only interested in 6+ ratings, you'd see more 60s oldies and soft rock stations. But somebody has to pay for them. The people paying want younger audiences.
As for flipping to something else, there really isn't another mass appeal music formal available.
I'm not sure what this is, could you go more in depth?and remember that Nielsen has a flexible policy of distributing non HDHA and HDBA meters within a county based on population distribution.
That would be a huge mess. Listenership for a format like that just doesn’t exist in Seattle. KHTP has a lock on the existing audience, and adding another station with this type of format would be a net negative (not a positive).Hip hop
I'm not sure what mistakes Star 101.5 made before their switch to Hank. I remember back in the day their Music Director got an interview where he touted their music mix tailored to a specific persona, a young woman who's too old for CHR but too young for the sleepytime Delilah-type AC at Warm 106.9. A customized and evolving Hot AC format, in other words, which intentionally spanned decades as Emma does now.Coulda sworn the Emma launch PR sheet mentioned a yet to be seen/defined "lifestyle" brand tie-in with Emma. And since one can custom brand anything from tablet computers to TV dinners, one could imagine what all of that would look like in Emmaworld. But 94.1 seems really all over the place. Spanning four decades from '90s Spice Girls/Shania Twain songs to Sabrina Carpenter. But I also notice KSWD seems to be repeating some of the same mistakes that KPLZ made as Star 101.5. But I guess that comes with Hot AC when you're playing second-ran to KRWM.
Agreed. Video games are still a popular activity for a wide swath of the demographics radio is going after.Or perhaps it's indicative of today's people. They do other things besides consume media.
Agreed. Video games are still a popular activity for a wide swath of the demographics radio is going after.