• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Denver Former KOA anchor Marty Lenz speaks out on the station's political slant

Marty Lenz was laid off from KOA's Colorado Morning News (CMN) last October, and the program was reduced to one hour. In this interview with the Colorado Times Recorder website, Lenz describes his commitment to straight-ahead journalism and even-handed coverage...something which he felt that iHeart was less and less favorable toward.

Sample quote:

"As noted earlier, it was always intentional for our program to deliver honest and unbiased news and information. At times, this was challenging, given the structure and perception of KOA — especially during the Covid pandemic. Both April {Zesbaugh, his original co-anchor} and I often felt as though we were “working against our audience.” For example, we would diligently report the latest information, data, protocols, and guidance from experts, epidemiologists, virologists, and policy leaders — only to have it undercut by other programming. While I don’t believe this was intentional, it often seemed driven by serving a “different master.” I have never worked harder professionally or felt a greater sense of responsibility to report, support, and serve our listening community than I did during the pandemic, all while feeling isolated — both physically, for obvious reasons, and professionally — from the rest of our broadcast operation. This experience stands as a valuable “area of opportunity” for anyone involved in programming and news leadership to learn from."

About his layoff, Lenz says:

"I was laid off during iHeart’s annual/semiannual reduction in force. While the official explanation cited cost-cutting — a common factor in many of the company’s business and programming decisions — I believe other considerations were also at play. On several occasions, the current local leadership noted that our style of morning news program was uncommon within iHeart, hinting that changes might be forthcoming. When KOA removed my boss Greg Foster in 2022, our corporate news leaders came in to meet with us. Toward the end of my individual meeting, one of the managers suggested there were things we could do to keep KOA a conservative news outlet. I immediately shot back, “We are not conservative news, we are not liberal news — we are news.” I don’t recall his response; I was stunned by his perspective. Looking back now, I see it as a bit of foreshadowing."

If you wonder why I am so critical of KOA and its rightward slant (while noting it could be worse), this interview provides a good explanation of what the station is doing. The full interview: Pandering Their Way to Oblivion? After Layoff, Former Radio News Anchor Reflects on His Job and the Future of Broadcast Journalism

H/T to Corey Hutchins' Behind the News in Colorado, which pointed out the interview this week. Note that Hutchins describes the political orientation of the Times Recorder as progressive. Other than the headline, though, there's no particular slant in the article, which mostly lets Lenz describe the situation in his own terms.

(Edited to provide a clearer title)
 
If you wonder why I am so critical of KOA and its rightward slant

Consider what just happened at iHeart's WOR in NYC. For the past year or so, they had a pretty straight morning news show with newsman Larry Mendte. It was one of the lowest rated stations in NY. They just recently added outspoken conservative Curtis Sliwa to the show, and gave Curtis top billing. No secret where it's going. My take is that straight news is viewed as bland and boring. They feel they need to take a side to add some edge to the presentation, and create passion. Is it good? Of course not.

 
Consider what just happened at iHeart's WOR in NYC. For the past year or so, they had a pretty straight morning news show with newsman Larry Mendte. It was one of the lowest rated stations in NY. They just recently added outspoken conservative Curtis Sliwa to the show, and gave Curtis top billing. No secret where it's going. My take is that straight news is viewed as bland and boring. They feel they need to take a side to add some edge to the presentation, and create passion. Is it good? Of course not.
To me, it looks like an opportunity to put their flag on a higher hill. The market is polarized due to the election of what many consider a very extreme mayor in "The City". So those that oppose that mayor and his platform will, I think, want a voice for their concerns.

The usual response for this kind of analysis is "but the conservatives are a smaller minority". All it takes is a small portion of that minority to be a top 10 rated station, as WABC has shown.
 
Marty Lenz was laid off from KOA's Colorado Morning News (CMN) last October, and the program was reduced to one hour. In this interview with the Colorado Times Recorder website, Lenz describes his commitment to straight-ahead journalism and even-handed coverage...something which he felt that iHeart was less and less favorable toward.
iHeart wants to attract and retain its audiences, which are conservative. Doing an even-handed interview with Jared Polis or Mike Johnston (the mayor of Denver) won't do that.

All this interview tells us is that Marty Lenz was living under a rock for at least a decade. With the possible exxception of the all-news stations on the coasts, there hasn't been much "broadcast journalism" in radio in a very long time.
 
Amazing, that in 2026 there are people out there who still expect to hear 'broadcast journalism' on commercial radio. NPR and public radio has been the domain for that for a long time. Most people know that's where you go for in depth reporting, features, and interviews.

There's a reason for the continuing surge of popularity of NPR news and talk. It's where we go nowadays for radio journalism. The conservatives have commercial talk radio, everyone else has NPR.
 
iHeart wants to attract and retain its audiences, which are conservative. Doing an even-handed interview with Jared Polis or Mike Johnston (the mayor of Denver) won't do that.

All this interview tells us is that Marty Lenz was living under a rock for at least a decade. With the possible exxception of the all-news stations on the coasts, there hasn't been much "broadcast journalism" in radio in a very long time.
I think that is an unfair characterization, but anyone hiding behind a pseudonym can do that without facing accountability. Marty was brought in (from KCBS!) to maintain a particular approach that had been associated with CMN. Then management changed. New management wanted to bring in something more ideological. Then Marty was laid off. Corporate politics being what they are, things were done in such a way to make it harder to conclude that one event led to another, but the optics stink. It reflects badly on the credibility of KOA and iHeart management.

Moreover, Colorado, especially the Front Range, has changed considerably in the past few years. A detailed explanation would require getting into political matters, so I will just say that appealing to a conservative audience while alienating a moderate audience is a certain dead-end. There are five conservative talk stations in this market, three of which are owned by iHeart. KHOW is really just the bargain-basement; KDFD is for the hard-core wingnuts. What keeps KOA afloat isn't talk; it's sports. CMN was a good complement to that.

Supposedly, Jeana Gondek's role in what remains of news in morning drive (four 2- or 3-minute newscasts per hour) is to be the straight newsperson. But the interaction between her and the more opinionated Ross Kaminsky blurs the line between news and opinion. Consideration of whether listeners are well served by such an approach is strangely absent.
 
Consideration of whether listeners are well served by such an approach is strangely absent.

What's strange about it? The fact that the current FCC is on the same side politically as commercial talk radio gives them cover for doing whatever is best for business. If the listeners are offended, there's always KCFR. Consider this iHeart's donation to that station's operating budget. If I was at KCFR, I'd create a big campaign to grab disgusted KOA listeners. "We'll be here for you as long as you are here for us." I always say that commercial radio serves the advertisers. Public radio serves the listeners.
 
You'd think with THREE talk stations, iHeart would have kept KOA as the middle-of-the-road, no slant News-Talk-Sports station. It already owns 630 KHOW with a mix of local and national conservative talk and 760/93.7 KDFD as the carrier of the Premiere Networks national conservative line up, Hannity, Beck, Clay & Buck. Why not just have KOA do drive time news blocks and evening sports with some midday service talk? Maybe move consumer advocate Tom Martino from KHOW to KOA? Talk doesn't always have to be "Trump Good, Democrats Bad" all the time, especially in a highly educated, progressive city like Denver.

iHeart owns All-News (with evening talk) WBZ Boston, consistently in the top five. Denver isn't that much smaller than Boston that putting all-news in AM and PM drive is a bad idea. BTW, last time I checked, KOA was easily the highest billing station in Denver. I'm sure that's in part due to all the sports teams it carries. But I'd think the morning news format is also attractive to advertisers.

Instead iHeart went the other way. Get rid of the all-news block in AM drive (other than 5 a.m.). iHeart management thinks having THREE conservative talk outlets in Denver is the way to go? I don't get it.
 
A few things to consider before sallying forth with the usual point-counterpoint:

1) No one, and I mean NO ONE, calls Colorado Public Radio "KCFR" except for the legal ID. It's Colorado Public Radio, CPR for short, and CPR News for the news-focused service (one of three CPR services).
2) Aside from legal IDs, the only call letters you'll hear on CPR News are "KRCC" because of the deal with Colorado College in the Springs.
3) CPR News has stations in much of the state, including Denver, Colorado Springs, Pueblo, some mountain communities, and the Western Slope (Grand Junction, etc.). So it can't focus on Denver or Denver metro news. It doesn't even do traffic reports. Programming can originate from Denver, Colorado Springs, or Grand Junction.
4) CPR News morning drive is "Morning Edition"; afternoon drive is "All Things Considered". There are local cut-ins, and CPR does custom intros in the afternoons, but a majority of the content comes from NPR. The main local program is "Colorado Matters" from 9-10 am, which is mostly long-form stories and interviews, two or three per program. My opinion is that they should be a little less long-form (it's a very 1980s-1990s NPR approach) but that's where they are.
5) There are multiple public media organizations seeking listener support: CPR, Rocky Mountain PBS (TV and KUVO plus "The Drop" on radio), PBS12 (TV), KGNU from Boulder (AM repeater in Denver), KVCU from Boulder (FM translator in Denver), KUNC in the Fort Collins-Greeley area. I give to three of them; I suspect that's more than most people do.
6) Points 1-5 should explain why CPR isn't a substitute for the former "Colorado Morning News" on KOA, name notwithstanding.
7) iHeart is using a cluster strategy: KDFD for the hard-core right-wingers, KOA for locally based conservtive talk with sports after 3 pm, KHOW for the leftovers. (KHOW's been a leftover station for decades but that's another story.) Salem has KNUS; Crawford has KLZ. Crawford seems to get most of its revenues through local sales.
8) KOA rises and falls with the Denver Broncos. The Broncos did well last season. The Colorado Rockies (baseball), on the other hand....
 
To me, it looks like an opportunity to put their flag on a higher hill. The market is polarized due to the election of what many consider a very extreme mayor in "The City". So those that oppose that mayor and his platform will, I think, want a voice for their concerns.

The usual response for this kind of analysis is "but the conservatives are a smaller minority". All it takes is a small portion of that minority to be a top 10 rated station, as WABC has shown.

so youre ok with slanted right wing opinion with some stuff being downright false masquarading as news and further dividing this country?
 
You'd think with THREE talk stations, iHeart would have kept KOA as the middle-of-the-road, no slant News-Talk-Sports station.
If you read the interview with Marty Lenz, you'll see that they tried to do that, at least in morning drive. Then there was a management change. Lenz also seems to hint in the interview that iHeart's corporate bureaucracy wanted to bring KOA in line with its other stations. Lenz spoke up, and, it appears, he paid a price for it.


Why not just have KOA do drive time news blocks and evening sports with some midday service talk? Maybe move consumer advocate Tom Martino from KHOW to KOA?
The current regime there seems to be enamored of people who just simply sound bad, irrespective of their political orientation. Michael Brown* sounds like a bleating goat with emphysema. Mandy Connell has a scratchy, unpleasant voice. Ross Kaminsky is a little easier to take but goes on long monologues.

I'm not much into fantasy scenarios, but, yeah, bring Martino over to the bigger signal. KHOW can be a little bit of a farm club (as it was for Michael Brown), and otherwise be overflow for the sports events that don't fit on KOA, which seems to be its bigger purpose anyway.

(* = yes, that Michael Brown, the former FEMA director, proving that, in the right-wing world, if you screw up at a real job, you can always become a radio talk-show host instead)
iHeart owns All-News (with evening talk) WBZ Boston, consistently in the top five.
Which they inherited and, so far it appears, haven't screwed it up too much.

Instead iHeart went the other way. Get rid of the all-news block in AM drive (other than 5 a.m.). iHeart management thinks having THREE conservative talk outlets in Denver is the way to go? I don't get it.
I quite frankly think they're incompetent. A great Broncos season covers up a lot of flaws elsewhere in the schedule.
 
The reality is that CMN isn't going back to how it was. Marty got the shaft. What else is new?
Maybe, maybe not. iHeart shuffles people around regularly, so things could change. But just because Marty got the shaft doesn't mean he's wrong.

The way for disgruntled listeners to show how they feel is to listen to something else.
There has to be an alternative for that to work and, for reasons I've already described, CPR News isn't it. Nor is KUNC.

You can argue that CPR is missing an opportunity. It certainly seems to underperform as far as listenership is concerned compared to similar markets. But you can't listen to something that isn't there.

There's always the alternative of simply not listening to radio at all. Is that what you're advocating? (Stipulate the usual statements about listeners going elsewhere anyway.)
 
Tom Martino used to be on KOA. He knew Alan Berg and has talked about him on his KHOW show.

I think when Martino’s “The Troubleshooter Show” was nationally syndicated, KOA was one of the stations it ran on, in addition to KHOW. I know it was on KHOW, since I streamed it.
 
I'm perfectly fine with CPR. That's why I suggested it. You do what's best for you.
That wasn't the question regarding alternatives to KOA. I've already explained, from having lived in the market and listening to the stations that are available to me, why CPR News isn't that alternative. You can reject that explanation if you want, but I know what the situation is "on the ground". You can't wave that away with a deflection.
 
Marty was brought in (from KCBS!) to maintain a particular approach that had been associated with CMN. Then management changed. New management wanted to bring in something more ideological. Then Marty was laid off. Corporate politics being what they are, things were done in such a way to make it harder to conclude that one event led to another, but the optics stink. It reflects badly on the credibility of KOA and iHeart management.
Mr. Lenz was at KOA for nearly 8 years. Of course management priorities and market conditions were going to change in that time.
But even before he joined KOA, a great many news/talk stations had moved away from the [City] Morning News format in AM drive for more opinion-based talk. The whole time he was there, stations were reducing the staffing on these shows, reducing hours, and cancelling them outright. And eventually that trend came to Denver.

One way to think about this: How many stations aired Amstrong and Getty in mornings in 2017, and how many aired them in 2025? A lot of those new affiliates were replacing local morning shows, including in large markets like Los Angeles.

Moreover, Colorado, especially the Front Range, has changed considerably in the past few years. A detailed explanation would require getting into political matters, so I will just say that appealing to a conservative audience while alienating a moderate audience is a certain dead-end.
iHeart has a lot of experience running conservative talk stations in liberal markets. KOA is not programmed that differently from the other iHeart talk stations in places like NYC and LA, except that KOA still has a significant sports element.

But it isn't just an iHeart thing. Many speculated when Urban One bought clusters including talk outlets in Charlotte and Indianapolis, they might shake up the programming strategy to focus on their strengths with black audiences, but that has not happened.
Audacy deploys the same basic programming strategy in Philadelphia and New Orleans, as does Cumulus in Dallas, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

I think that is an unfair characterization, but anyone hiding behind a pseudonym can do that without facing accountability.
Correct. I'm very happy not having "accountability," whatever that means in the context of a public message board about radio.
 
Mr. Lenz was at KOA for nearly 8 years. Of course management priorities and market conditions were going to change in that time.
But even before he joined KOA, a great many news/talk stations had moved away from the [City] Morning News format in AM drive for more opinion-based talk. The whole time he was there, stations were reducing the staffing on these shows, reducing hours, and cancelling them outright. And eventually that trend came to Denver.

You seem hung up on blaming Marty Lenz for what happened to him. That's obnoxious.
iHeart has a lot of experience running conservative talk stations in liberal markets. KOA is not programmed that differently from the other iHeart talk stations in places like NYC and LA, except that KOA still has a significant sports element.
Denver is not New York or Los Angeles. But iHeart is a company that forces a one-size-fits-all model on most of its stations, whether or not it's actually appropriate.
Correct. I'm very happy not having "accountability," whatever that means in the context of a public message board about radio.
Then I have to conclude that you're trolling.
 


Back
Top Bottom