• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Do radio stations do live radio giveaways anymore

What? It always boils down to money. To get that money, you need people to hear that ad. So programming has to be there to attract the listener that sells the ads that pays the bills. Theater of the Mind , I'd think you'd understand this and lay off the stupid remarks. The radio business is about making money just like any other business.
 
What will please some of them will alienate the rest of them. And outliers -- as our friend the Chimp has illustrated in this thread -- won't sit through the stuff that alienates him just to get to the stuff that doesn't. And his fellow outliers won't sit through anything he likes if they don't also like it.

Your suggestion is a recipe for disaster, and would result in an even lower total potential audience than what we do now. And I will also suggest that this advice from my earlier post applies:
During the decade and change that I ran the in house research division of Univision Radio I was able to look in depth at outliers... those who deviate from the fairly narrow norm of a taste or format group... and saw what you describe: each of those outliers was amazingly different from the rest.

There is no way to satisfy those individuals as each is rather unique and there is no consensus taste among them
 
Yet the Variety Hits (Bob / Jack / "we play whatever we feel like") format has lasted 20+ years so far, at least paying lip service to doing just that.
As K. M. has said, those stations research quite deeply. They do music tests and perceptual research, and know how to satisfy their audience. And that audience is not composed of outliers. It is just a group of people with a common taste that is not satisfied by standard AC, oldies or classic rock stations. What really sets them apart is that the listeners have another thing in common besides their music in that they did mot like conventional DJs and their associated chatter.
 
The broadcasting industry is full of people like yourself who don't believe they're in the entertainment business and it shows if you listen to their stations.
Advertising is our business, but to make money we have to entertain our listeners. Our product is that entertainment, and we sell it to the advertisers.
If all you care about is selling ads and utterly dismiss the entertainment in between the commercial breaks as something that is not your business -- which you just did -- then you might as well get out of broadcasting and sell insurance.
You are showing the kind of reaction that I normally associate with a person who criticizes radio without any practical experience in running a radio station. We are an ad medium and in the advertising business. But unless we attract listeners by entertaining, amusing or informing them,
 
They seem to do well with advertising, but the more contemporary classic hits FM that shows up in the 12-plus numbers is surely propping it up. The man owns several stations and plays what he wants.
There is a common belief around here that the quantity of ads indicates the amount of revenue. Many stations use their "oldies" AM or similar low audience station to bonus the advertisers on their other stations. Others that have no sister stations sell for "a dollar a holler" and have lots of ads, but nearly no revenue.
 
As I have said many times before: Repeating the same tired arguments that have been disproved every time they were posted in the past is not going to get agreement from anyone but your fellow outliers (who, honestly, are guilty of the same behavior). And it's not going to change anything, except to make people tired of hearing the person repeat himself ... and we all know what that leads to, do we not?
My point is, by far the number one complaint about music radio today, and the number one reason people give for why they stopped listening to it, is "they play the same songs over and over again". Pointing at a database printout and saying "ACKSHULLY, you're wrong!" isn't going to help change that perception. Just ask any politician who lost an election not because the economy was actually doing bad, but because people felt the economy was bad -- a "vibecession".

Radio is in a vibecession, and trusting a computer printout more than what (ex-)listeners are actually saying isn't going to change that.

Do I have the answer for how to turn things around, or if it is even possible to turn things around? No! But first you have to accept the reality that radio has a reputation for repetition.
 
The broadcasting industry is full of people like yourself who don't believe they're in the entertainment business and it shows if you listen to their stations.



People don't tune in to hear commercials. They tune in to hear quality programming, so yes it takes precedence, or at least holds equal importance to the advertising. If you execute the entertainment part correctly, you'll attract the audience advertisers want to reach and that's when you can start selling your ads. It's amazing how you keep demonstrating in your posts that you don't understand this, or at least have total contempt for it.

If all you care about is selling ads and utterly dismiss the entertainment in between the commercial breaks as something that is not your business -- which you just did -- then you might as well get out of broadcasting and sell insurance.

Actually, id thoroughly enjoy KM.s 80s channel.......... buncha bangers on his format, honestly. a person can be in it just for business and still do a good job.

Radio is a business and thats got to come first
 
My point is, by far the number one complaint about music radio today, and the number one reason people give for why they stopped listening to it, is "they play the same songs over and over again". Pointing at a database printout and saying "ACKSHULLY, you're wrong!" isn't going to help change that perception.

There's some truth to that. I've talked a few times about the friend of mine who worked in a hair salon when I worked in radio and swore she heard "Landslide" by the Dixie Chicks on my station every hour at work. That was not possible; it was a four hour rotation. Yes, you would occasionally hear that song closer to three or five hours apart depending on where it fell in each of the hours it played, but it averaged about four hours over a single day. It might've played in consecutive hours once-or-twice going into or coming out of syndicated programming, but that never happened during the workday. Convincing her of that was impossible.

Radio is in a vibecession, and trusting a computer printout more than what (ex-)listeners are actually saying isn't going to change that.
Do I have the answer for how to turn things around, or if it is even possible to turn things around? No! But first you have to accept the reality that radio has a reputation for repetition.

Here's the other side of that. Was that friend of mine in the hair salon ever going to listen to my station outside of work? No. She liked pop and country, not AC. Did she have those complaints about her favorite stations? Also, no. The two CHR's in the market had much higher repetition rates than my AC had. Her complaint was really that she had soured on the Dixie Chicks after Natalie Mains badmouthed George W. Bush at a concert in Europe and was hearing too much of an act she didn't like. People tune into radio to hear their favorite songs, and they have an expectation that they'll get that. Playing 2,000 different songs doesn't meet that expectation. Listeners start complaining and stop becoming listeners when they don't hear enough of their favorites. If radio could get a big enough audience to sell to advertisers by playing 2,000 songs with no repetition, it would absolutely do that.
 
If we should only be so lucky! Beasley's "Magic 98.3" repeats its entire playlist every six hours like clockwork.

very few people would notice that

My boss at Flinn Broadcasting's adult leaning Hot AC Mix 101.1 KWCA Redding, CA once complained we played the same songs way too often, another sales person said their client suggested we play more 90s.

I said "We play our powers once per day part on average.... our competitors at Power 94.7 play them double that and sometimes more. If we play more 90s, we'll shift ourselves much closer to KShasta, a station we'll never beat.. We're squarely between the two right now. Were also modulating at 105 percent, theyre modulating darn near 130 percent. We arent too soft, they're too loud!"

My boss got pup at liek 330-4am went to bed at 8 and did nothing but listen to the radio all day.. only our station. And neither the GSM/GM or sales people were younger than 60...so they had no concept of the format
 
God im not sure what I hate more...the generation who perpetuates this impression of radio, or the overall impression corporate radio gives anyone who knows "just a little bit" about the business. Radio stations ALL over the country still do call in contests all the time. Just because 2 big companies who own 1100 of the 15,000 radio stations in the country "seem" to not do call in contests anymore, doesn't mean the rest of us aren't. You could also ask "Do radio stations do Tradio anymore?" or "Do radio stations still run news, local sports and obituaries anymore". Just because you either live in one large area of the country, that is only served by big companies, or you hear from websites and message boards that "radio is dead", doesn't mean the overwhelming majority aren't still doing something resembling real radio anymore. It might not be 24/7 like it used to be. It might pivot between call ins and online contesting. But it's still being done. In thousands of small to medium markets all over the country. Just because Z100 or KISS FM don't do call in contests anymore (and I don't honestly know if they do) doesnt mean EVERYONE isn't.
Ha! We still do tradio, obituaries, local sports, and local news... Our tradio show actually still does pretty well!
 
Ha! We still do tradio, obituaries, local sports, and local news... Our tradio show actually still does pretty well!

We did the hospital and obit report at WKBI and when it got missed for technical or personal reasons, we got a complaint from a listener.. every time. a blind lady who obviously didnt bother with the newspaper, the only other source in our community
 
I remember when I started at WDBL, we would read the hospital dismissals. This was several decades before HIPPA an the Internet. I asked why didn't we read the admissions so if I heard a friend's name I could visit them in the hospital. The answer was several years ago they did until the sheriff asked them to stop. Someone figured out what houses to rob while the family was visiting their loved one.
 
If all you care about is selling ads and utterly dismiss the entertainment in between the commercial breaks as something that is not your business -- which you just did -- then you might as well get out of broadcasting and sell insurance.

Do not twist my words to fit your POV.

I have said -- many times, in many threads -- that the programming has to be as good as possible. Not because it is "filler between stopsets", but because without programming that attracts listeners, there is nothing to sell to advertisers.

That does not make radio into an entertainment business. The whole point is still to be viable as a commercial medium, and my part of that is creating content that is saleable. From your posts, taken as a whole, you seem to believe that the programming is more important than the advertising, and that is the flaw in your logic.

The situation is symbiotic. The programming attracts the listeners, whose "ears" are sold to the advertisers. But without the programming, there is nothing to sell, and the station goes under. So we are primarily in the advertising business, and the entertainment side is important but not the main focus from a business perspective.

I never said that all I care about is selling ads. I have never said that. You have twisted my words deliberately in an attempt to win the argument, and I demand an apology.
 
If we should only be so lucky! Beasley's "Magic 98.3" repeats its entire playlist every six hours like clockwork.

If they want to embrace bad programming practices, it will come back to bite them soon enough.
 
I've shared this station before, but anyone wants a station that plays a very broad playlist over multiple decades and genres, Magic 95.9 WPNC in North Carolina should be your go-to

The website promises over 10,000 songs in active rotation. Everybody's favorite song... eventually. Give it a listen and see how long it takes for a song you dislike and/or don't know. For me it's never very long.

Oh, and the website gives that other one a run for its money

 
My point is, by far the number one complaint about music radio today, and the number one reason people give for why they stopped listening to it, is "they play the same songs over and over again". Pointing at a database printout and saying "ACKSHULLY, you're wrong!" isn't going to help change that perception.

Stop relying on anecdotal "proof". I already know -- as does anyone who has read enough of your posts in various threads -- that your default position is "attack what radio programmers do, even if the station is successful" and "always counter fact with rhetoric". Honestly, I don't know why the management still lets you post.

I proved to you by my own example that scheduling rules can bounce a song all over the day and night, and since the majority of listeners tune in at the same approximate times, they won't have that complaint if the song rotation and scheduling is done correctly. But you don't see that. All you see is "you played the song over and over again", without even acknowledging the nuance.

Your post proves my point. Your POV is incredibly negative with not a trace of positiveness. Go away.
 
I've shared this station before, but anyone wants a station that plays a very broad playlist over multiple decades and genres, Magic 95.9 WPNC in North Carolina should be your go-to

The website promises over 10,000 songs in active rotation. Everybody's favorite song... eventually. Give it a listen and see how long it takes for a song you dislike and/or don't know. For me it's never very long.

Oh, and the website gives that other one a run for its money


Our flagship FM here has been variety before variety was cool... before Wow, etc.

We dont have a 10,000 song playlist but we have variety across all genres and many decades

I wonder what a train wreck 10,000 songs in active rotation is.
 


Back
Top Bottom