Incorrect. There are XM radios and Sirius radios and that divide was reflected in subscription packages until earlier this year."On the XM side, they changed the second-tier 'Select' subscription to include streaming for no extra cost a few years ago. Before that, you had to order the highest-priced 'unlimited' tier if you wanted streaming included, or pay something like $5.95/mo extra on top of the second tier subscriptions."
There is no XM side. SXM is treated from a subscription standpoint, as one entity.
With what used to be called XM Select, you got all channels except Stern. The Sirius side got Stern included with their package at no extra charge. On the XM side (an XM radio), you had to get the All-Access package (now known as Platinum) to get Stern and streaming for an extra charge on the order of $5.99/mo over the Select subscription. The streaming was later (a few years ago) added to XM Select at no extra charge as discussed above.
In more non-monolithic SXM news, SiriusXM announced earlier this year their intention to sunset the Sirius satellites and transmission technology and continue with the XM platform. Since there is a large installed base of Sirius radios in cars, it's not clear when this transition can begin.
Pedantry. The call center handles the complaint volume for SXM. SXM gets metrics from the call center.[The cancel subscription desk is] Farmed out. SXM has nobody answering phones. Not even a receptionist.
Boomers pay subscription fees just like younger folks. This isn't an industry where they stop paying attention at 54. Revenue is revenue. You can move the channels to higher numbers, but if you know what you're doing, you don't sacrifice revenue by moving older-skewing popular channels off the birds where the older listeners have a hard time accessing them, especially where a channel has a high preponderence of P1s. That's what SXM learned from their Escape mistake.Rightfully so, more focus with any media business isn't on Boomers and senior citizens, but the future audience. Granted, they still need to keep whatever subscribers they have, but likely there aren't new boomers signing up.
SXM had to reverse themselves a month later. That's what it means. They got it wrong, and it was immediately apparent.“All hell broke loose” sounds a bit like “went viral.” It has no real meaning. A relatively small number of people get themselves all worked up and they’re convinced by their own echo chamber that it’s far more impactful than it is.
Reversing a channel allocation decision in a month is SXM's version of 'turning on a dime.' That's as fast as they could get it done. That bad decision was going to have real consequences - it was going to affect revenue, hence the reversal. Clear cut case. No imaginary 'echo chamber.'