• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

A good definition of "Do and Don't" for non-commercial stations

davideduardo

Moderator/Administrator
Staff member
WOLD-LP didn't get the memo, because they've been running full-blown ads for years. They apparently think that taking the same 60-second spot that plays on commercial stations, including the jingles, superlatives, lists of products and services, etc., but merely editing out the "call to action" is enough to satisfy the FCC requirements. The station owner told me his "FCC consultant" determined that is sufficient.

For example, they run the same ads for Dr. Lederman as virtually every other NYC-area station, and simply edit out the part where he says "call now".
 
WOLD-LP didn't get the memo, because they've been running full-blown ads for years. They apparently think that taking the same 60-second spot that plays on commercial stations, including the jingles, superlatives, lists of products and services, etc., but merely editing out the "call to action" is enough to satisfy the FCC requirements. The station owner told me his "FCC consultant" determined that is sufficient.

For example, they run the same ads for Dr. Lederman as virtually every other NYC-area station, and simply edit out the part where he says "call now".

Someone should forward the opinion and advice I posted to them. And then, they should be reported to the FCC.

Breaking News: I used their website to send the text of Oxenford's memo / post. I will probably get a "F-You Very Much Reply". That, then, will go to the FCC.
 
This is a very good article. Underwriting is pretty easy to understand. What is difficult to understand is the rules that are not written. I have always advised stations to keep far away from that line in the sand the FCC has drawn.

The 'menu selections' the FCC notes should be 4 or fewer items and 3 is even safer. WOBO was fined for 5 items although it was a 15 second announcement. The FCC does NOT say how many items is too many in their rules nor do they state a number that is too many when admonishing and/or fining a station.

The FCC does not say an Underwriting announcement cannot exceed 30 seconds, only that the chances increase for violating FCC Underwriting Rules the lengthier the spot gets. I advise stations to go with 10 seconds, ideally, and not more than 15 seconds. I like the 8 second unit best.

Underwriting rules make no indication that Underwriting Announcements cannot be 'produced', scripted, with sound effects or with music background. The rules are silent about that but the FCC does use this as a justification for a fine (although not the sole reason).

In one instance, the FCC, in admonishing a Low Power FM, stated the Underwriting Announcements had production values similar to commercial stations. Per the FCC your announcements should sound 'different' enough to determine it is not a commercial. In the same opinion, the FCC noted the Underwriting Units were played in sets of 3 and 4, four times an hour. They noted the frequency and quantity resembled commercial stations in the area and suggested not more than an average of 6 Underwriting Units in an hour (never seen that one used again). By the way, a State NPR ran 36 underwriting credits between national and local on All Things Considered. I surmise the number per hour is less important than the presentation. This itself is a joke. The average radio listener has no idea what the difference is between an Underwriting Announcement and a commercial. In fact, my mechanic's wife was ticked at the Contemporary Christian non-comm she listened to. She heard a competitor sponsor a weather forecast and called the station wanting to buy commercials. The receptionist answering the phone was not on the ball. She didn't put her on to the Underwriting desk but told her they didn't run commercials and she couldn't buy any on the station. The mechanic's wife thought she had been lied to. I explained that for her.

There are a few out there that give LPFMs a bad name by running full-blown commercials and seemingly get away with it for years. Of those I've kept track of, they got caught and were on a very, very short leash with the FCC. Most wound up getting fined after getting a pass the first time. Stations in Florida, West Virginia and Oklahoma come to mind. I tell stations commercial competitors will watch for compliance and many will report you when you don't. One Houston metro Christian LPFM cleaned up after running full-blown commercials and infomercials for businesses after they were warned by fellow broadcasters to adhere to the rules or there would be a complaint filed. They claimed ignorance. I didn't buy that excuse.

The FCC just doesn't strike the moment you err. They wait, watch and establish a pattern of non-compliance so they have you not on one announcement but many. In essence they have enough to nail you to the wall with many nails before they pull out the hammer. You might wiggle out of 1 but they have you on 9 more to be sure you have no wiggle room.

Underwriting is so easy to control. Radio stations can dictate what they will run. The commercial station I work for sold a package where a business got a mention. We dictated what they got. Nobody demanded more and they bought with the full understanding of what they bought. I have sold 'business card' underwriting (never telling the client of the restrictive language required). For example: Support comes from John Deaux Pest Control offering once a year fire ant control. John Deaux Pest Control 555-1212. That station concluded each Underwriting Announcement with 'more information available in the Business Directory on the station's website (we had been advised phone numbers and websites were hard for listeners to memorize). We defined a business card as your business name, contact info and what you offer. We pushed more you say the harder it is to remember, so be short, sweet and to the point for best results. I had people say 'do you just walk if they demand you include something borderline?'. Yes you do. A person that doesn't follow the rules there, likely won't in other areas as well. If it's not what they genuinely want, fine but normally it is a control issue. So you walk because nothing good will happen beyond that point if you don't.

The most amazing I have knowledge of: two LPFMs in a certain town: both at unauthorized towers, antennas mounted higher than licensed, both greatly over-powered and both running commercials complete with calls to action, pricing and such. They made each other mad and both turned the competitor in to the FCC. The FCC did visit and found all the described. Both stations were admonished and given 30 days to become compliant. In my opinion, both licenses should have been yanked. They must have been very cooperative with the FCC Agent.
 
Last edited:
Someone should forward the opinion and advice I posted to them. And then, they should be reported to the FCC.

Breaking News: I used their website to send the text of Oxenford's memo / post. I will probably get a "F-You Very Much Reply". That, then, will go to the FCC.

And I got a kind, thoughtful and thorough response, explaining how the stream and the on-air content are different and how they have systems to prevent overlap. I suggested they check the security of the protections, as there have been reports of high-intensity spots on the LPFM. I can't emphasize enough how nice and complete their response was.
 
That is one thing some folks don't get. The LPFM that streams can run commercials on their online feed. The FCC has asked in the past if recordings were made off air or from online streams.

Also, a non-profit can run calls to action and such although I wonder how much of that the FCC allows. A non-profit group, Medi-Share is saying 'save you up to $500 a month on your monthly premium' and other incentives like 'if you call now we'll wave membership fees'. I heard that on the WAY-FM affiliate in Dallas/Fort Worth today as I scanned the dial.
 
Also, a non-profit can run calls to action and such although I wonder how much of that the FCC allows. A non-profit group, Medi-Share is saying 'save you up to $500 a month on your monthly premium' and other incentives like 'if you call now we'll wave membership fees'. I heard that on the WAY-FM affiliate in Dallas/Fort Worth today as I scanned the dial.
Medi-Share is officially registered as a Christian ministry. Thus their promise of saving you money is equivalent to a promise of Jesus saving your soul.
 
And I got a kind, thoughtful and thorough response, explaining how the stream and the on-air content are different and how they have systems to prevent overlap. I suggested they check the security of the protections, as there have been reports of high-intensity spots on the LPFM. I can't emphasize enough how nice and complete their response was.
Hear for yourself what WOLD-LP's on-air "underwriting announcements" sounded like today:

http://www.amstereo.org/files/wold-lp 7-8-2020.mp3

"Buy one, get one 40% off!"
"Call (phone number) now to schedule your free window diagnosis!"
"For a free telephone consultation, the number to call is..."
And a long laundry list of services in one of the spots.
 
Hear for yourself what WOLD-LP's on-air "underwriting announcements" sounded like today:

http://www.amstereo.org/files/wold-lp 7-8-2020.mp3

"Buy one, get one 40% off!"
"Call (phone number) now to schedule your free window diagnosis!"
"For a free telephone consultation, the number to call is..."
And a long laundry list of services in one of the spots.

I have to say, that's a pretty tight-sounding little LPFM. Yes the Window spot was way over the line: Two calls to action and a pricing comparison. Funny thing was; the Farmers Insurance U.C. that followed was fine, even with the jingle at the end. You can talk about any number of services an Underwriter provides, just not that they are the qualitatively the "best" at any one or all of those services. Need to leave it generic that the business provides the services.

Still, I'm surprised by the clients they've got on what amounts to a Radio Sandbox. If they can just get the verbiage back within the guardrails of the legal road, they'll have a great little operation there.
 
Last edited:
I never noticed this before last Saturday but WFAE (NPR) referred to sponsors, not underwriters.

I guess that's legal.


That sounds like a semantics issue rather than a legal one.

I can "sponsor" a teen in our local Little League, as an example. Or I can "sponsor" an exchange student. Add "etcetera" to that.

So the issue is that the company is contributing to the WFAE cause, whether it be called underwriting or sponsoring.

And at a time of a planet-wide deadly plague, "underwriting" sounds too much like "undertaking". I'd prefer "sponsorship" very definitely.
 
I have to say, that's a pretty tight-sounding little LPFM. Yes the Window spot was way over the line: Two calls to action and a pricing comparison. Funny thing was; the Farmers Insurance U.C. that followed was fine, even with the jingle at the end. You can talk about any number of services an Underwriter provides, just not that they are the qualitatively the "best" at any one or all of those services. Need to leave it generic that the business provides the services.

Still, I'm surprised by the clients they've got on what amounts to a Radio Sandbox. If they can just get the verbiage back within the guardrails of the legal road, they'll have a great little operation there.

I corresponded with the station, and got a wonderfully complete and nice response. The stream's stopsets are 100% commercial, while the separate LPFM programming has standard-meeting sponsorship / underwriting announcements written in compliance.

It is interesting that this station is doing something that big commercial stations want to do with their HD signals via separate min-transmitters; it's featured in today's Inside Radio where a station in San Diego has begun use of the system. It allows neighborhood specific advertising!

The system is MaxCast and here is the news article http://www.insideradio.com/free/kwf...cle_f1df9abc-c7f0-11ea-b357-e31f6a34d22c.html

So big FMs suddenly want to be a bunch of LPFMs.

"As the world turns"... sometimes it needs lubricant!
 
Actually that neighborhood specific idea is a good one for commercial radio. While only some businesses can afford to buy the top full market stations or full market newspaper, many, many businesses would buy if they could afford it, especially if they didn't have to pay the cost per thousand to reach 75% of the market that will never step foot in that business. This affords stations to sell the big boys and then ice the cake with more area specific ads. In reality, if you can sell each sector, that unit of time might even eclipse the full market rate for that same unit of time. Nobody says it will be easy, but newspaper sections specific to certain portions of a metro and even some cable companies that sell segments of the metro, are already taking all of those ad dollars. Why not radio as well?
 
Actually that neighborhood specific idea is a good one for commercial radio. While only some businesses can afford to buy the top full market stations or full market newspaper, many, many businesses would buy if they could afford it, especially if they didn't have to pay the cost per thousand to reach 75% of the market that will never step foot in that business. This affords stations to sell the big boys and then ice the cake with more area specific ads. In reality, if you can sell each sector, that unit of time might even eclipse the full market rate for that same unit of time. Nobody says it will be easy, but newspaper sections specific to certain portions of a metro and even some cable companies that sell segments of the metro, are already taking all of those ad dollars. Why not radio as well?
WNAM sometimes gives me ads that are very specific to the Charlotte NC area. I've heard ads for Belk, for example, which is a chain sort of like Macy's, which has no stores anywhere near Wisconsin.
 
WNAM sometimes gives me ads that are very specific to the Charlotte NC area. I've heard ads for Belk, for example, which is a chain sort of like Macy's, which has no stores anywhere near Wisconsin.

That is done by the Internet "distributor" for the WNAM content. Depending on the region your ISP is located in, they can insert ads for your location in every stream they manage.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom