I subscribe to the Athletic, so I found the article and read it. My takeaway is very simple....and just my opinion. I know a little about WWL. The news director there was a friend of mine, and I visited the station a couple of times before he left just before hurricane Katrina in 2005. WWL is one of the strongest local brands in any U.S. media market. And not just for radio. WWL-TV had some of of the highest ratings for its local newscasts (including sports) of any station in America. All this when the owner was Loyola University! I got the impression from the article that the attempts to develop a viable all sports competitor was either under-funded and/or under-committed. Then there's the matter of weak or rimshot signals. And finally, as I alluded to in my previous post, WWL had/has a lock on the city's favorite sports teams and personalities.
I wouldn't want to have to compete against WWL. It would be like trying to bring down an elephant with a pea shooter. Even if you were properly funded with an all-star lineup and a big signal, it would be a very, very difficult task.
I wouldn't want to have to compete against WWL. It would be like trying to bring down an elephant with a pea shooter. Even if you were properly funded with an all-star lineup and a big signal, it would be a very, very difficult task.