• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

"AM for Every Vehicle Act" is flawed - we need a "Future of Radio Act"

The issue is revenue. How many buys on WHO are take into account the coverage outside the Metro Survey Area?

Even Agribusiness stations like WNAX are affected because farmers now have Internet connectivity and can get updates on demand on weather, prices and more.
I honestly don’t know, especially nowdays. When I did a stint there it was roughly 25-30 percent I’d say?? That’s what I can maybe recall from a non sales person. Can’t recall for sure. But as I said they have to weigh it. And maybe the programming shifts slightly if they move it to FM. But it has such a statewide farm identity any change would greatly affect that.

But also maybe it’s not as big a deal now.
 
And, because of the power needs for the Ibiquity chip, there never were portable radios with HD, even in the pre-smartphone era when that was important.
Um, there's the Sangean HDR-14, which operates on 3 AA batteries. (The SG-108 is the same as the HDR-14, except the cabinet is white.) Battery consumption doesn't seem to be excessive compared to non-HD radios.
 
Um, there's the Sangean HDR-14, which operates on 3 AA batteries. (The SG-108 is the same as the HDR-14, except the cabinet is white.) Battery consumption doesn't seem to be excessive compared to non-HD radios.
Yes, about a quarter century later when nearly nobody buys a portable radio. The HD chip is more efficient now, but that does not matter. A radio is not a smartphone.
 
Yes, about a quarter century later when nearly nobody buys a portable radio. The HD chip is more efficient now, but that does not matter. A radio is not a smartphone.
You didn't limit your assertion as to time.
 
Um, there's the Sangean HDR-14, which operates on 3 AA batteries. (The SG-108 is the same as the HDR-14, except the cabinet is white.) Battery consumption doesn't seem to be excessive compared to non-HD radios.
There's also the Sangean HDR-16, which is somewhat bigger and has stereo speakers. Per David Eduardo's comment, I doubt that either of these are big sellers, as portable radios seem to be very much a niche product today.
 
There's also the Sangean HDR-16, which is somewhat bigger and has stereo speakers. Per David Eduardo's comment, I doubt that either of these are big sellers, as portable radios seem to be very much a niche product today.
I own two of them. They're among the best portable AM/FM radios I've ever owned, both for HD and analog. Money well spent.
 
I own two of them. They're among the best portable AM/FM radios I've ever owned, both for HD and analog. Money well spent.
I have a Tecsun PL880 which is a great portable and emergency radio. Also recommended (and I am a former owner of an SX 99, an HQ 180 and an R399 so have pretty demanding objectives.
 
Somewhat related, the FCC wants to mandate disaster coverage by radio:


My question is would it apply to all broadcasters, or would religious stations, such as EMF, be exempt?
 
Somewhat related, the FCC wants to mandate disaster coverage by radio:


My question is would it apply to all broadcasters, or would religious stations, such as EMF, be exempt?
It seems that only translators are exempt. What somewhat concerns me is this sentence, "The Commission is also considering exempting LPFMs from the mandate, although it is hesitant out of a concern that many of those stations reach into non-English speaking communities." I hope they do decide to exempt LPFM. Not only do low power stations suffer from limited staffing but the staff are mostly volunteers with limited knowledge of FCC rules and procedures. This rule would, more than likely, be a fine catcher for LPFM.
 
I hope they do decide to exempt LPFM. Not only do low power stations suffer from limited staffing but the staff are mostly volunteers with limited knowledge of FCC rules and procedures. This rule would, more than likely, be a fine catcher for LPFM.
No friggin way! What's good for the goose, is good for the gander. If you want to play radio with the big boys, then step up and assume equal responsibility despite your teeny coverage area. LPFM already gets too many passes that cost real radio stations a lot of time and expense.
 
Somewhat related, the FCC wants to mandate disaster coverage by radio:


My question is would it apply to all broadcasters, or would religious stations, such as EMF, be exempt?
"Thoughts and prayers" for the victims of the disasters might fulfill that mandate.
 
No friggin way! What's good for the goose, is good for the gander. If you want to play radio with the big boys, then step up and assume equal responsibility despite your teeny coverage area. LPFM already gets too many passes that cost real radio stations a lot of time and expense.
Commercial=real. Got it. The power of synonyms. I totally get what you are saying, but insults do nothing to further the narrative.
 
Commercial=real. Got it. The power of synonyms. I totally get what you are saying, but insults do nothing to further the narrative.
Commercial or public, full class real stations cost more to run with much more requited paperwork. LPFM's want to play in the sandbox as a member of their community? Then play time is over.
 
No friggin way! What's good for the goose, is good for the gander. If you want to play radio with the big boys, then step up and assume equal responsibility despite your teeny coverage area. LPFM already gets too many passes that cost real radio stations a lot of time and expense.
Bitter, much? I suspected my comment would draw the haters. Just what an imperiled industry like radio needs, more exploding heads.
 
Bitter, much? I suspected my comment would draw the haters. Just what an imperiled industry like radio needs, more exploding heads.
Figures. Rather than defend the stance of LPFM's serving their community only when it suits them, or convenient, they just call those who call them out, haters. Got it.
 
Figures. Rather than defend the stance of LPFM's serving their community only when it suits them, or convenient, they just call those who call them out, haters. Got it.
I don't need to defend LPFM. Much has already been written extolling the benefits of the LPFM service. On the other hand, you have made your hatred of LPFM quite obvious on this forum. And as the man said, haters are gonna hate.
 
Aren't there companies that will verify that the EAS devices at radio stations are operating properly (that's the minimum obligation a USA licensed radio station has for providing emergency info).

3rd party companies provide all sorts of services for businesses - fire control system checkouts and compliance, HVAC system maintenance etc., EAS device verification is just another activity for a 3rd party business.

Also, why isn't the FCC required record keeping already automated, seems like just buying (or renting) some specialized software for the computers at the radio station is all that's needed for most/all record keeping?


Kirk Bayne
 
Aren't there companies that will verify that the EAS devices at radio stations are operating properly (that's the minimum obligation a USA licensed radio station has for providing emergency info).
No. Even if there were, it wouldn't be a very profitable business model.
3rd party companies provide all sorts of services for businesses - fire control system checkouts and compliance, HVAC system maintenance etc., EAS device verification is just another activity for a 3rd party business.
There aren't that many EAS systems around as compared with HVAC systems.
Also, why isn't the FCC required record keeping already automated, seems like just buying (or renting) some specialized software for the computers at the radio station is all that's needed for most/all record keeping?
The FCC doesn't require certain record keeping anymore, but only that if something comes up, the station has some way of showing proof something occurred. Like all EAS boxes log tests sent and received which can be retained at the station or printed for the station to produce should an inspection occur.
State and local municipalities don't have any such requirement for logging EAS or being inspected, because their activities aren't regulated by the FCC.
Kirk Bayne
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom