• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Anonymous editorial on the FCC approval of HD Radio

Chuck said:
R.F. Burns said:
When more stations tuen on their IBOC exciters I think you'll enjoy you Sangean even more. How does it do in analog? How does it compare with your other tunes? Mine is much more sensitive then my Sansui TU-717.

The Sangean is a very good tuner. I think I mentioned that. It has excellent selectivity, and the sensitivity isn't bad either. I'd call it a bargain at $200, even if it never receives any HD signals. I haven't had time to find out how it performs in really bad RF environments (like at a transmitter site) but located not too far from our tower, it does not seem to have any big issues with getting the front end swamped. I don't think it is in the same class as Fanfare, but it also costs about 1/6 as much, so you have to take that into account.

I have to admit that I still like my old 1970's vintage Marantz tuner better. I don't think the Marantz is as sensitive or selective as the Sangean, but does sound "warmer" to my somewhat tired ears. Perhaps I like the sound of 35 year old leaky capacitors. ;)


Although I don't live at a trtansmitter site, I'd say that I live in one of the most crowded RF areas of the country, if not the world (NYC) and the HDT-1 is remarkabley sensitive and selective. The selectivity is due to DSP, which is part of the HD specs. As I mentioned another time, I am able to weakly hear a station which is over 140 miles away and it's first adjacent to, two local Class B's. For 200$ this is some remarkable peice of equipment.
 
R.F. Burns said:
For 200$ this is some remarkable peice of equipment.

I think it is too. I don't get excited just because it has a DSP chip in it though. That's fairly common in a lot of better analog radios. Just look at the radio in most recent model cars. It is amazing what technology (and Chinese assembly) brings us at very reasonable prices. Maybe these are "the good old days...
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom