• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Another movie package question: What is the significance of 1948?

In the recent movie package threads I've noticed that almost if not all of them are made up of movies from before 1948. I had known that 1948 was the dividing point for the packages of Warner Bros. cartoons, but didn't know that it was also the dividing point for other movie packages as well.

What is the reason behind this? is this some agreed upon standard by the movie studios, or possibly something to do with the beginnings of network television broadcasting on a large scale, or some other reason? Thanks for the info in advance. :)
 
I think it was a case of a different rate of residual compensation for actors who appeared in films made after 1948, than in those made prior thereto. However, others more knowledgeable on the subject may well elaborate on this more than I could.
 
wbhist said:
I think it was a case of a different rate of residual compensation for actors who appeared in films made after 1948, than in those made prior thereto. However, others more knowledgeable on the subject may well elaborate on this more than I could.

I believe it was a combination of that and the fact that back in those days ( 40s and 50's ) there were many of those second-run theatres and drive-ins that would show older movies, second or even third runs meaning that a theatre in 1956 could very well be showing a movie from 1950 so by keeping post-1948 movies off of TV..this protected them.

Also in the late 40's and early 50's many stars and studios had this "hatred" for TV with some stars such as Clark Gable, William Holden, Bogart & McCall going public about how they did not like TV and refuse to get involved much less actually owning a set. Lana Turner changed that attitude in the early 50's when she told the press how much she "enjoys watching TV"..and soon other actors followed Lana.

As they say "what goes around comes around"...those anti-TV feelings have somewhat returned recently as many stars such Tom Cruise, John Travolta, Will Smith, Seth Rogen, director Quentin Tarantino have admitted over the recent years..they they don't even own TV sets..and this trend has spilled in to TV itself. Just last week my wife had read that despite making millions doing the show "Cougar Town" for ABC, Courtney Cox refuses to allow TV in her home.
 
When the first major-studio film packages were assembled for TV in 1955 and 1956, The various performing unions agreed that virtually every studio film produced or released before September 1948 was considered "pre-TV-era" and thus not subject to residuals and other payments.
Some post-1948 films did appear on early TV but they either were not covered by the same legislation (certain United Artists and British features, for example) or the producers had already made monetary settlements with the unions.
RKO Radio had to enter into special arrangements with the unions to include its post-1948, pre-1954 features in the C&C Television Corporation package in 1956. Republic pictures syndicated all of its films made prior to 1957 in mid-1958 because it was no longer an active production company and thus not subject to union restrictions (or so they insisted).
 
The studios all through the 1940s and 50s had a kind of "gentlemen's agreement" not to release any post-1948 features, or even the pre-1948 major color blockbusters like Gone With The Wind, for television play, in order to try to preserve the value of recent product for theatrical release and (in the case of the blockbusters of the time) re-release in the movie theaters.

Atitudes began to change later after the studios made peace with the networks, stopped looking at them just as competitors and started looking at them as potential production partners when they began selling a lot of series produced by their lots for the networks to air. The big change came in 1961. NBC struck a multi-million dollar deal with 20th Century Fox for the first television release of a large library of their more recent films initially released between 1949 and about 1959, sweetened a few years later by releases from the early 1960s, for a new movie series called simply "Saturday Night At The Movies". The broadcast of relatively recent hits (most all of them in color) proved lucrative for Fox and a big ratings booster for NBC when they hit the air in the fall of 1961, not to mention a significant sales-booster for color TV sets (most of which were made by NBC parent RCA back in those days). The NBC movie deal changed everything, and got the other studios to start licensing network play of their newer films as well. Even today you don't see films less than a couple years old on over-the-air broadcast television unless they're specifically made for TV (another subject worth a separate thread)--the very recent films go from theaters to pay per view and DVD first, then soon afterward to cable, before the networks and local stations take their turn. But the 1961 Fox deal with NBC broke the dam on telecast of films that weren't a decade or more old.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom