• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Anyone know of any good TV Listings websites?

Mine only sells something called The Epoch Times. The competing supermarket across the way sells the three local papers from Hartford, Middletown and New Britain, CT. Strange!

From time to time, someone leaves a bundle of The Epoch Times right at the door of the Food Lion in Chapin SC and I am able to get it for free. The Food Lion is just across the street from my church.
 
OMG, was that a memory flogger for me?!? I remember STVW well, and also Satellite Orbit (yes, you got the name right). In the early 1980s, I "moonlighted" as the marketing designer for a mail-order C-band satellite equipment direct-to-consumer sales organization and had subscriptions to both.

If you ever find old copies, I would enjoy seeing scans of sample pages.



The point about "shelf space" at the supermarkets is probably the final nail in the coffin for such an idea. What I think hammered in the rest of the nails is the double-punch of the increased number of people who cancelled cable television (or, like me, only get broadband from the cable company) in the early days of OTA digital, and have moved on from there to streaming.

Talk about deforestation: Even if you only used grids, and only included mass-appeal subchannels plus the primary for all OTA stations in Chicagoland, you'd have a few dozen pages at "regular" magazine page size, and even though that could be lessened somewhat with a larger page format (presuming you could find any way to display it at a supermarket checkout line without magazine racks) you would likely be sending a lot of unsold issues every week to the recycler. I doubt the business model would work now (which is probably why no one is doing that).

But it does make one think how shortsighted Bruce Springsteen was when he restricted himself to "57 Channels (And Nothin' On)" back in the day ...
There are a few issues of Satellite Orbit on eBay now.

TV and Satellite Week is still published weekly in the UK in print and digital editions. But with one time zone and no local stations as we know them, it's a comparative snap compared to the U.S.

Remember TV-Cable Week, which Time Inc. launched to combat TV Guide in 1983? System-specific grid listings inside a national color section. Ran through $100 million in 20 weeks ($47 million in production costs plus a massive start-up cost) and Time folded it when only 19 cable systems, including those owned by Time Inc., picked it up. TV Guide had 17.1 million circulation at the time.
 
There are a few issues of Satellite Orbit on eBay now.

TV and Satellite Week is still published weekly in the UK in print and digital editions. But with one time zone and no local stations as we know them, it's a comparative snap compared to the U.S.

Remember TV-Cable Week, which Time Inc. launched to combat TV Guide in 1983? System-specific grid listings inside a national color section. Ran through $100 million in 20 weeks ($47 million in production costs plus a massive start-up cost) and Time folded it when only 19 cable systems, including those owned by Time Inc., picked it up. TV Guide had 17.1 million circulation at the time.
The cable system serving Fairfax County VA (it was either Media General, Adelphia, or Cox, I forget which one) had a system-specific, interlocked TV Guide-like magazine for subscribers, and they did a fairly good job. They dropped the Baltimore network stations the week I moved to Fairfax County (June or July 1988), bummer, I was in hopes of getting those. They did retain WBFF, WNUV, and MPT.

I was on the 14th floor of a high-rise near Tysons and I could get the main Baltimore stations with spotty reception, as well as sometimes WPMT-43 from York PA, with a set of RadioShack VHF/UHF rabbit ears and loop. My high-rise had a six-channel MATV system and I got DC 4/5/7/9 with WETA on channel 6 and WDCA on channel 12.
 
In recent years, with cord-cutting rampant, I wondered if a local over-the-air only program magazine would be possible, including main and sub-channels, that would appeal to those with antennae. Here in Chicago, I counted up about 120 OTA outlets, not including subchannels.
One problem with doing that would be the extreme language fragmentation of broadcast television audiences today versus in decades past. At least here in Los Angeles, there are seemingly endless languages represented by all our stations, and I wonder how many of their viewers are fully non-English speaking. It would be difficult producing a "full service" publication like a new TV Guide, with listings augmented by articles and advertising, if everything in it but the grids was uninteresting or opaque to so many of its subscribers. During its prime, wasn't TV Guide available in an all-Spanish edition for markets with large Spanish-speaking populations? In any case, having editions for an ocean of languages would require tons of employees, and lots of ongoing market research to keep abreast of what to print, how much, where to distribute it, and so on.

I only wonder, if television is destined to be replaced with on demand video (regardless of origin), how long those listings services will last.
I think what the online listings sites need to start doing is add streaming to what they list. Picture them indexing the complete catalogs of all the VOD libraries like Netflix, plus offering traditional listings for the linear channels on all the OTT platforms like Pluto.

The real killer app feature would be if they allowed searching across all platforms simultaneously. And that means the ability to do simple searches plus power searching of any category imaginable for film and television buffs. For example, imagine that a power user wants to find every movie released in the USA between 01/01/1980 and 12/31/1989 that was done by Warner Brothers, is in English, has French subtitles available, is rated between PG and R, runs 100 or fewer minutes, is in color, is a comedy, has Danny Elfman as the music composer, and that co-stars Geena Davis. Or imagine a regular user looking for any French language film from the 1960s that's a romance with English subtitles. Or someone just searching for any and all films with Chevy Chase. Many of the linear OTT and VOD platforms don't offer this kind of searching power, and the linear television listings sites upgrading themselves to "all-platforms metadata clearinghouses" in order to give people that power would be a splendid way for them to remain relevant. They could even offer natural language AI searches of film and television series/episode descriptions, so users could find things they only remember vaguely. "Which movie was about the two high school students who rode in a phone booth to get people from antiquity for a book report in San Dimas?" Or, "which movies have scenes filmed at Raging Waters in California?"

In any case, the key thing would be that when your search results appeared, you'd see all possible sources combined -- roof antenna diginets, local broadcast stations, cable/satellite networks, and all known internet OTT platforms. From there, you could sort and drill down using the same search fields you populated when running your search. For example, if you ran the complex Geena Davis search above, you could choose to sort not just by title, but by year or length, since those two were non-exact (left blank or specified as ranges) in your search. Or you could add/remove operators (e.g. add a writer, remove the year range). The ability to sort by traditional attributes would also go without saying. E.g., by "air time" (for linear streams, cable/satellite networks, and OTA channels/diginets), by "available until" (for VOD platforms), and even by price (which would either show as "Free," "Free with Ads," give the per-view cost for PPV items on platforms like Youtube and Tubi, or show the per-month cost for whole-platform subscription services like Netflix). Searching by price would be a wonderful way, in particular, to bargain hunt.

TV and Satellite Week is still published weekly in the UK in print and digital editions.
That's different. K.M. was referring to Satellite TV Week, a now extinct U.S. publication similar to Satellite Orbit. It was also for U.S. C-band and ran during the 1980s and 1990s.

Remember TV-Cable Week, which Time Inc. launched to combat TV Guide in 1983? System-specific grid listings inside a national color section. Ran through $100 million in 20 weeks ($47 million in production costs plus a massive start-up cost) and Time folded it when only 19 cable systems, including those owned by Time Inc., picked it up. TV Guide had 17.1 million circulation at the time.
Ouch. I don't remember that publication, but I do remember one my grandmother paid for through her cable company called "The Cable Guide." It was very much like TV Guide but its contents were customized to her system's channel line-up. I found several editions for sale on eBay, including these:


Example of an inside page, customized for a specific system: https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/n2IAAOSwdlNnmCTs/s-l2000.jpg

While looking through those, I also noticed copies of another publication for sale called Cable Today, apparently for a cable system in the Bay Area:

 
Last edited:
During its prime, wasn't TV Guide available in an all-Spanish edition for markets with large Spanish-speaking populations?
I never heard that before. There was a virtual clone of TV Guide in Puerto Rico back in the day, aside from the language difference, you would almost have to be told that the listings pages weren't from TVG.

At one time, TVG editions in the US near the Canadian border would often list programs from French-language stations in Canada, with everything including the program descriptions being in French. This could be seen in, among others, the Vermont edition. That was kind of cool.
 


Back
Top Bottom