• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Audacy Files for a Handful of ‘ CBS-FM Boosters

Audacy today filed applications for six FM boosters for WCBS-FM (101.1) and one for WXBK (94.7). The 101.1 boosters will target Stamford, CT, Brentwood & Farmingdale in NY, and Asbury Park, East Brunswick & New Brunswick in NJ. The 94.7 booster is for Stamford, CT, and along with the Stamford 101.1 booster, will share an antenna on the aux tower for co-owned WFAN (AM) on High Island in the Bronx. Power will be 2.5 kw for these two, as will the one for Farmingdale on Long Island. The others propose lower power levels. A link to one of the apps is below.

WCBS-FM CP for Stamford
 
Would that WCBS-FM booster cause issues with WKCI-FM 101.3 of Hamden/New Haven?

As for Stamford, is the old 96.7 FM tower used by any radio stations anymore?
 
That's ... a lot of boosters. I wonder why Audacy thinks they will be helpful.

I wonder if this is why. I had forgotten all about it but there was discussion about it here at the time.

 
Would that WCBS-FM booster cause issues with WKCI-FM 101.3 of Hamden/New Haven?

As for Stamford, is the old 96.7 FM tower used by any radio stations anymore?

By definition, a booster's signal has to be contained within the predicted protected contour of its primary station. As a class B station, that's 54 dBu for WCBS-FM, and so the 54 of the booster can't go beyond the 54 of the main transmitter... and thus can't "cause issues" with other stations.
 
Ah! Thanks for that! I barely get to listen to terrestrial radio anymore. I don't think I had ever seen a station using a booster here in the Hartford/New Britain/Middletown market.
 
I wonder if this is why. I had forgotten all about it but there was discussion about it here at the time.

That makes sense. I doubt that any station broadcasting from ESB has signal issues in Stamford.
Has Zonecasting been used successfully in any major market?
 
What a weird place to put a booster intended to serve Stamford!
(The boosters for both WXBK and WCBS-FM would use this same island site.)


Wouldn't this just create a mish mash between the booster signal and the parent signal in & near Stamford? How easily received are WXBK and WCBS-FM in SW Connecticut today?
 
A lot of red on the map for WXBK.
CBS-FM is OK. 94.7 is not as good...a bit more static.
It will be interesting to see how much 2.5kW off a short tower on High Island will make a difference in Stamford. Along the sound should be great...basically line of sight. Once you get inland it will probably break down pretty quickly due to terrain and the directional signal.
 
If WXBK can put a 2.5kw tower on High Island, wouldn’t that be short spaced to WWSK Smithtown (one of the reasons WXBK cannot transmit at full power from ESB)?
 
If WXBK can put a 2.5kw tower on High Island, wouldn’t that be short spaced to WWSK Smithtown (one of the reasons WXBK cannot transmit at full power from ESB)?

As explained earlier in the thread, a booster's primary contour cannot extend past the predicted primary contour of the parent station.

So no, by definition a booster can't be short-spaced if its parent station isn't short spaced.
 
I assume the booster won't cause multipath issues with the main signal?

Along the Cross Island Parkway, north of the LIE, the FMs out of the City have always had a tremendous amount of multipath problems.

This booster, if it doesn't cause problems with the main signal, will have a direct line-of-sight from the WCBS/WFAN tower. It may fix the multipath for WCBS-FM.
 
What I’m more concerned about with this potential “zonecasting” is interference. I’m assuming it’s for zonecasting as boosters would’ve been added decades ago if it were a reception issue.

Even with master clock-derived timing where the boosters are on-sync with the main signal, there’s going to be spots where the commercials will be a mish mash of stuff. For a lot of people, that’s a tune-out IMHO. When you’re getting people commuting in their cars, you may drive ears off the station!

My big question will be how this gets sold: if I buy commercial time on CBS-FM, could I choose to just advertise to Stamford at a cheaper rate? Will the ad rates on the main signal go down since they may not be broadcasting to all of its original coverage area? Are they going to go with separate advertising for each booster, or package all the boosters together as a “suburban” package with the main being a “city” ad rate?

If it’s sold properly, and the transition zone between the main and booster is rather small, I could see this as a win for broadcast radio…it would lower the price per spot to a point to potentially allow smaller businesses to advertise on a larger station and better compete with geo-located internet streaming for ad dollars.
 
There was a press release issued by Audacy on this matter.

GeoBroadcast Solutions is the party working with the company to make these boosters for WCBS-FM and WXBK a reality. The plan is to deploy MaxxCasting technology.

WCBS-FM is co-channel to B101 in Philly and first adjacent to KC 101 in New Haven, CT, so I actually can see why CBS-FM's signal would need a boost in certain locales.
 
WCBS-FM is co-channel to B101 in Philly and first adjacent to KC 101 in New Haven, CT, so I actually can see why CBS-FM's signal would need a boost in certain locales.
Does this not risk interfering with either of the other stations' protected contour?
 


Back
Top Bottom