To you Mr. President, (Mr. Bell)
A.Your the one that has all your facts WRONG about me and what I own. Go to the FCC CDBS database and view the lattest application. I have 60% Contoling Stock of my company, which puts me UPFRONT.
B. In 2000, a man came in my station claiming to be Mr. Kolb's father. He said his son owned your station. He was quite RUDE and wanted to buy this station. He started to get pushy with me, so I asked him to leave. That is WHY I take a dim look at you people.
C. My corporate records reflect what I'm saying.....end of discussion!
Mr. Bailey, a.k.a. Rocko11:
I appreciate your taking the time to present the percentages of ownership of the shareholders of WNSR. By virtue of his stock, Mr. Kolb is indeed an owner of WNSR.
Elsewhere on this board, you purport to be an owner of WMRO. As in Mr. Kolb’s case, with regard to WNSR, you, too, do not hold a majority interest in WMRO. But, you still choose to call yourself an owner. However, under the guise of “setting the record straight”, you characterize Jeff’s just and legal ownership as “lying to the public”.
It seems to me that the respective ownership interests, Mr. Kolb’s and yours, actually mirror one another; Neither is a majority. Yet, you both maintain an interest in a broadcast property, and are entitled to use of the term “owner”.
Nonetheless, when it comes to the definition of ownership, the percentage of stock is only relevant when it meets your goals to enhance your own (self-) image and, furthermore, to discredit and harm another individual’s reputation. The latter is unacceptable.
As to your comments about our corporation's officers, I am somewhat confused. To the best of my knowledge, individually or corporately, we have never had any contact whatsoever. And, quite frankly, considering your propensity for presenting your personal opinions as fact, I hope that we never will.
The foregoing notwithstanding, if you have a factual issue with our company, I would be most willing to discuss it. You are welcome to call me at anytime. On the other hand, considering the originating source, and your choice of venue, I suspect that your remarks are much ado about nothing.
In closing, may I offer a personal observation to you? I have to wonder how you would react if you read a variety of personal attacks on you, your family, and/or "your" daytimer in Gallatin? Presumably, you would find such comments as disconcerting as I have found yours to be. Additionally, to what degree would such "opinions" be tolerated? With respect to same, our tolerance is rather brief.
President, Southern Wabash Communications Corporation