• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

CBS Radio sues KCAA due to Imus Rebroadcast...

CBS Radio, Inc. USA. What a bunch of sore losers, cry baby cry, make your mothers sigh, your old enough to know beter, so cry baby cry! Forgive them father for they know not what they are doing! Quick someone call
CBS Radio a wahambuelence! They just can't stand it when somebody with a brain shows them how stupid it was to have fired the Imus show. And each broacast is worth $150,000 yea right!
 
Who really has the rights here. KCAA feels they have a contract with WW1 to carry Imus. CBS firing him and cutting WW1 from content seems beyond the scope of the CBS lawsuit. But then I'm just an observer. It's fun to watch the little station that could.
 
This is a strange story, because KCAA announced last week that they intended on carrying "The Best Of Imus" this week. If CBS had objections, they should have told the station no. To my knowledge they did not, or KCAA didn't make that information public. Now CBS wants to sue them over that?!
 
No crime committed for just "talking" about running a re-broadcast (and getting the publicity, which KCAA did.) No law against saying you'd do something.

CBS owns the copyright (and protection provided) for the program, by contract with Imus. Westwood One is the mere program distributor.

The "intellectual rights" to the program broadcast belong to CBS Radio for every program and includes, usually, in an affiliate agreement, the right to (or not) rebroadcast outside of a contracted period of time.

They waited, also, to make an effort to put teeth into the cost of lawyers, etc. and to set the stage for an out of court settlement. Running the program (evidenciary) as KCAA did for five days at $150,000 a clip for federal copyright infringement is pretty teethy.

It will be moreso if the station defies the apparent C&D next week and, especially, a TRO if ordered by a court.

Westwood One had every right under the contract to cancel the distribution agreement and to be held harmless. CBS cancelled the Imus program.

From contracts of their's I've seen, expecially in a "for cause" cancellation, they aren't required to substitute another program or conpensate for the cancellation.
 
Update:

How many pages for CBS to sue 1400-watt KCAA for rebroadcasts of Imus programs?

187.

The full suit is on the KCAA web site at: www.kcaaradio.com
 
Someone in the business commented that in his non-legal opinion most Westwood One contracts are very one-sided. He wouldn't sign one without scads of changes and addendums.
 
Hmmmmm. CBS thinks Imus is worth $150,000 a show on KCAA, and demonstrated exactly how much they think he's worth nationwide by firing him. Weird.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom