TheBigA said:
JimPastrick said:
I'm here to say Buffalo PDs do write the liners; the live ones and the produced ones.
As I said, I know about markets the size of Buffalo where liners and positioners come from the consultant. The PD has no say. I really doubt that every PD in Buffalo writes his own liners. I don't know, but I see a lot of very standard syndicated positioners that no local PD could have written. "The best and most country," or "the best mix of the 60s, 70s, and 80s." No PD in Buffalo wrote those.
I respectfully submit that I've seen both sides...an old PD of mine was fired because he wouldn't implement a liner handed to him by the corporate owner (who currently owns multiple properties in WNY). The handwritten note was on the fired PD's Facebook page for a long time as proof. Nevermind the liner didn't fit the format...the incident happened.
Later I had the pleasure of writing the imaging for that station. The main positioning and image statements always came from the PD (often, I suspect, with corporate input) and I brought the branding to life. At least for us...it was always a group effort and I'm proud of how it all sounded.
There was a big hubbub in Country back in the early 90's over the phrase "Today's Hot New Country". Was it the main station positioner or an image statement applying to current product? Somehow coming out of a ten year old song with "Today's Hot New Country" just didn't work. But those who used it that way most likely did so because a consultant or corporate PD said to.
Today the hot thing (at least in Top 40 and Country) is to build 3rd person credibility by having listeners and artists do at least some of your liners. Leaves a lot fewer opportunities for us voice guys but I agree it's the right direction.
JimPastrick said:
Seems we've traded one flawed system for another. But like everything else, the better you know how to play the game, the more likely it is you'll score points.
Here's what I've learned, and it's served me well: You can't change things you aren't responsible for. The PPM system was demanded by advertisers. I don't know if you deal with advertisers, but they're used to getting their way. This isn't a reality TV show where we get to vote. So our opinions really don't matter. The advertisers pay the bills and the salaries, and they wanted something more modern than handwritten diaries. So all we can do is find a way to work within the system, flawed as it may be.
[/quote]
Very well put A.
I've said it on other threads. I think PPM
has the potential to make us better personalities. The PD's who misintrepret data or use too little data over too short of a time are the ones who see PPM as an excuse to minimize or get rid of talent...when what people actually want is a real person in the studio relating content of interest to the listener along with their favorite music.
Can Arbitron increase the sample size? You betcha!
Can they develop a PPM that doesn't look so nerdy? Let's hope so.
Yes, PPM has its flaws. But I'll take it over the diary any day of the week.