Bonneville has been one of the most responsible and ethical broadcasters that exists or has existed.We can only hope.
Bonneville has been one of the most responsible and ethical broadcasters that exists or has existed.We can only hope.
KOIT is a perennial #3, except in December when they're wall-to-wall Christmas music and eat everyone's lunch. Since they're never going to seriously challenge either KQED or KCBS, they've done the best they can with their "format 42" AC music format. KMVQ too. Really the only station in the cluster that's a mismatch is KBLX. I could never figure out why a company owned by LDS would want that particular station/format. It just seems like they've picked a foreign language they can't speak.
And what is wrong with a company saying that they are not comfortable with a particular format?Right. Keep in mind that when Bonneville purchased the 92.3 frequency in Phoenix (I think it was back in 2005--but I could be wrong), it changed the callsign to KTAR-FM from KKFR and the format from hip-hop to conservative news/talk, specifically (per Bonneville's public statements) because the company didn't want to own a rap station no matter how well it did in the ratings. (And, if I remember correctly, @michael hagerty was working there at the time and can probably shed some more light on the matter, if he's up to it.)
Right. Keep in mind that when Bonneville purchased the 92.3 frequency in Phoenix (I think it was back in 2005--but I could be wrong), it changed the callsign to KTAR-FM from KKFR and the format from hip-hop to conservative news/talk, specifically (per Bonneville's public statements) because the company didn't want to own a rap station no matter how well it did in the ratings.
I remember that flip, and when it happened I couldn't believe the comments I was reading online at the time. Accusing Bonneville of being a 'racist' company that didn't want to play music from 'black' artists. Give me a break! It was the lyrical content of hip hop/rap that Bonneville had a problem with. Not because of race.And what is wrong with a company saying that they are not comfortable with a particular format?
Right. Keep in mind that when Bonneville purchased the 92.3 frequency in Phoenix (I think it was back in 2005--but I could be wrong), it changed the callsign to KTAR-FM from KKFR and the format from hip-hop to conservative news/talk, specifically (per Bonneville's public statements) because the company didn't want to own a rap station no matter how well it did in the ratings. (And, if I remember correctly, @michael hagerty was working there at the time and can probably shed some more light on the matter, if he's up to it.)
Keep in mind that at one time Bonneville owned stations in NY, LA, CHI, Dallas, Houston, DC, as well as many more. They were once a much bigger company.
In 2011, they sold a big group to Hubbard. They've been downsizing for a while.
I remember that flip, and when it happened I couldn't believe the comments I was reading online at the time. Accusing Bonneville of being a 'racist' company that didn't want to play music from 'black' artists. Give me a break! It was the lyrical content of hip hop/rap that Bonneville had a problem with. Not because of race.
I remember that flip, and when it happened I couldn't believe the comments I was reading online at the time. Accusing Bonneville of being a 'racist' company that didn't want to play music from 'black' artists. Give me a break! It was the lyrical content of hip hop/rap that Bonneville had a problem with. Not because of race.
Right. Keep in mind that when Bonneville purchased the 92.3 frequency in Phoenix (I think it was back in 2005--but I could be wrong), it changed the callsign to KTAR-FM from KKFR and the format from hip-hop to conservative news/talk, specifically (per Bonneville's public statements) because the company didn't want to own a rap station no matter how well it did in the ratings.
While I did find a little odd that Bonneville would buy a station that targeted the African American audience when it got some of the Entercom/CBS spinoffs, I wasn't entirely surprised that it kept the format. Bonneville wants to make money first and foremost, and I don't think it has corporate format directors or brand managers for most, if any, of its programming.
The last time I heard 99.7 NOW, which was prior to Fernando's leaving, I felt it was one of the best CHR's in the country. Based on its ratings success, a format change is unlikely.Do you think 99.7 now will stay chr?
It was the same in San Francisco. They haven't owned KOIT continuously. IIRC, they traded it with Entercom for Seattle stations to beef up their cluster up there, and when the CBS Radio acquisition happened, they were there to re-acquire KOIT and the other CBS stations (KMVQ, KBLX and KUFX San Jose) that needed to be divested for Entercom (now Audacy) to stay within limits.They also cycle in and out of markets. They left Phoenix for a while (1997, when they sold 96.9 to Nationwide), but came back.
It was the same in San Francisco. They haven't owned KOIT continuously. IIRC, they traded it with Entercom for Seattle stations to beef up their cluster up there,
When they had stations in Kansas City for three decades, the word on the street was that there was a glass ceiling for employees who weren't Mormon. Whether that could ever have been verified is another matter. The other rumor was that they were in Kansas City because of the centrality of Independence (adjacent to Kansas City) in Mormon theology. Selling to Entercom disproved that one. They were kind of sleepy as a broadcaster. KMBZ had substantial success in the 1970s and rode on those coattails in the 1980s to decreasing effect. KMBR (KLTH) managed the transition from beautiful music to "lite" adult contemporary smoothly. When Bonneville acquired KCMO-AM/FM, Gannett had pretty much stripped the AM talk station for parts and Bonneville finished the job to bolster KMBZ as a news/talk station. They were smart enough to leave KCMO-FM alone. I think Entercom benefited more from Bonneville's moves in Kansas City than Bonneville did, which at least was an indication that Bonneville was good at looking beyond the short-term.From my (limited) experience working for Bonneville:
There are no problem formats, no attempt to impose LDS doctrine in office or on air (apart from whichever of their stations carry Music and the Spoken Word every Sunday).
That said, Bonneville is owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and, I think understandably, does not want to prioritize money over church teaching.
I'm not Mormon, but I respect that, and I think that it's admirable that they (generally) find a reasonable path of not selling out their core beliefs and entertaining a wide audience.
Maybe Eagle Media should at least look into buying these stations!
If it's the Eagle I'm thinking of (the one based in Kansas)...no.Lord no. They’re better off in the Midwest, their bread ‘n’ butter.
At a general level, superficially this appears to be a case of a company expanding very fast, adding acquisitions before it's had a chance to fully integrate previous acquisitions.
Besides that, where's Warshaw getting the money?
"Those who do not learn from history..." (George Santayana)"Financing was provided by Brigade Capital Management and Sienna Lending."
He seems to have a blank check. So he's spending it while he has it. Reminds me of Lew Dickey in 2011. We know where that went.
Maybe I should grit my teeth and give KYGO in Denver a listen; maybe that's not necessary, for whatever it is KYGO's doing, it's been very successful.They owned a few country stations in the 90s and I remember they had a policy where they wouldn't play drinking songs. That's hard to do in country.