Is Audacy getting ready to sell or close down a station? It wouldn't be shockingly if in a year or two either WCBS 880 or (hopefully not) WXBK go on the market.
They are not going to to sell individual stations in that manner because all are "on the books" at higher values than they could sell for, so the end result of a sale is a write-down of the asset value. And doing any write-down would cause lenders and investors to further devalue the company.Is Audacy getting ready to sell or close down a station? It wouldn't be shockingly if in a year or two either WCBS 880 or (hopefully not) WXBK go on the market.
And doing any write-down would cause lenders and investors to further devalue the company.
A trade is a like-kind transaction where the value of one item is said to be the same as the value it is traded for. Since there is no cash, there is no write-down.Audacy has been actively trading its stations around the country in attempts to improve their clusters. They recently traded some stations with Beasley in Las Vegas.
Basically, the lenders don't want to become owners, so this will be a negotiation to "kick the bottle down the road" as Kelly stated in another thread.The company did a conference call with the financial media on Tuesday where they discussed their financial situation, and a here's an article that sums up the situation:
Given Audacy's need to contain costs, is there a strong possibility numerous local on-air personalities will be laid off, and national or automated programming will be substituted?
I can see 94.7 & 880 being sold.
To who?I can see 94.7 & 880 being sold.
Not in this solar system.Beasley.
WCBS would probably be purchased by a company like Multicultural Radio and 94.7 would probably move over to WNEW or WFANFM. If not, a HD2 subchannel of one of the Audacy stations.I can see 94.7 & 880 being sold.
In fact, given that WINS and WCBS-AM have been under the same ownership for the past 25 or so years, I'm a bit surprised that the two stations haven't yet been consolidated into one.
Well, combining them might allow them to raise their ad rates but I agree it would not double.They each bill over $30 million for a combined total of $60 million. Combining them throws away $30 million.
The Fields have "super voting" shares, but they do not control a majority of the total number of outstanding shares. So, they might lend money to the company but they are not going to put any more in than other shareholders might also do.The more relevant question is what is Audacy doing to do about their impending delisting? A reverse split, or a reverse split with a cash infusion from the Field family?
The more relevant question is what is Audacy doing to do about their impending delisting? A reverse split, or a reverse split with a cash infusion from the Field family?