Re: Court TV seeking to televise Station Nightclub Trial, will WHJJ or WPRO do the same?
> > > From a practical point, wall to wall coverage won't
> happen
> >
> > > on radio, and probably not for long periods on local TV
> > > either. I would think that Court TV is the best bet for
> > > gavel to gavel coverage.
> > >
> > > For Radio:
> > >
> > > 1. Audience nightmare; An entire trial on radio would be
>
> > > unlistenable. And besides, despite the magnitude of the
> > > tragedy and the scope of its impact, I anticipate a lot
> of
> >
> > > the testimony will be very technical in nature.
> > >
> > > 2. Programming nightmare; commercials, news, weather,
> > > traffic...taking breaks from the trial for other
> > programming
> > > elements defeats the purpose of the coverage, doesn't
> it?
> > > And we all know neither Citadel or CC is going to
> > sacrifice
> > > revenue.
> > >
> > > More likely scenario: Broadcasting what are considered
> > most
> > > compelling parts of the trial. (ie) Opening statements,
>
> > > testimony from certain witnesses, closing arguments,
> > > verdicts. Radio could simply pick up the TV pool audio
> > feed.
> > >
> > >
> > > Only my opinion. Would be interested in other thoughts.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I would think there is a good chance that WPRO-630
> > and/or
> > > > WHJJ-920 would broadcast the Station Nightclub trial
> > live
> > > on
> > > > a gavel-to-gavel basis.
> > > >
> > > > It's shaping up to be the biggest trial in Rhode
> Island
> > > > history, and I expect that it will be covered live,
> > > > start-to-finish and gavel-to-gavel on both radio and
> TV
> > > not
> > > > only in Providence, but probably in Boston as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > Interesting question, You can bet Violet will have a
> major
> > say.
> > It will probably be 'highlites', if there is such a thing,
>
> > on the
> > daily events.
> > It would be the most morbid of radio ,gavel to gavel!
> >
> kenny again...............
>
> I am figuring all though I am not there.WPRO will be the
> first to set up shop in a trailor with highlites like with
> the Buddy trial.
> WHJJ will probably do something but tell me if I am wrong
> here.Does nt WHJJ and WHJY have to be careful of what they
> say because they are defendants in I want to say the cival
> part of the case.So called promoting the concert, Dave
> Kane,Mike Gonsalves.etc.So even if they(WHJJ) would be
> covering it.Would nt Arlene and people comentating on it on
> the air have to be careful of what they say about the
> case.Unlike WPRO who is not a defendant and you would more
> than likely get more from WPRO than WHJJ.
>
>
> I'm sure the CC stations jocks and Talk show hosts don't
> want to have something they say today on the air come back
> and bite them tomarrow.
> Do you know what I mean?
whjj have been talking about this since it happened. granted it was an whjy event but whjj must cover it to have some credibility here. also, both stations had trailers during the cianci trial.. i dont know about wpro but clearchannel has a few survivors who are employed still at the radio station. (you hear one of them almost every night) I think when it comes to clear channel they should talk about it for the sake of the ones they've lost and ones who are still working there. but i bet wpro will have the upperhand because the news department isnrt what it used to be over at whjj. i hope helen glover wont be talking about her cooking segments & howie bart wont be discussing how many people hate bush during the trial coverage..
>