• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Director Rob Reiner and wife Michelle found dead in their home

Yabadabado1 said:
While I vehemently disagreed with what Kirk said he had the right to say it and ABSOLUTELY was disgusted by what that psychopath did. May not have liked what happened as the guy had a wife and young kids that are now fatherless and that is what bothers me the most.
Click to expand...

Regardless of my personal distaste for what Kirk made himself stand for, I have to agree with that on purely humanistic grounds.
 
If you want to wade through the California Penal code sections they charged him under just highlight the code and paste it into your browser and what will happen to him when or if he is convicted: I would just highlight the penal code section and paste it into your browser to go to the relevant statute.
On or about December 14, 2025, in the County of Los Angeles, the crime of MURDER, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTION 187(a), a Felony, was committed by NICK REINER, who did unlawfully, and with malice aforethought murder ROBERT REINER, a human being.
“NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c) and a violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 667.5(c).”
NOTICE: Upon a felony conviction for the above offense, prison custody time is to be served in state prison based upon the above felony offense being a serious felony defined in Penal Code section 1192.7 and/or violent felony defined in Penal Code section 667.5(c), or a felony offense requiring registration as sex offender pursuant to Penal Code section 290(c), within the meaning of Penal Code section l 170(h)(3).

It can be a tough slog to understand all the legalese.
 
Yabadabado1 said:
And the one thing I really liked about him was that he invited the opposition to "come up and prove me wrong".
Click to expand...

That kind of thing happens here on this message board, and it often infuriates the other poster to the point where the discussion devolves into angry name-calling and personal attacks. People are passionate about their beliefs. On both sides. Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes the bear eats you.
 
Yabadabado1 said:
And the one thing I really liked about him was that he invited the opposition to "come up and prove me wrong".
Click to expand...
But not in good faith. His claim to fame was taking clips from his "debates" and posting them on social media with clickbait titles like "Charlie Kirk ANNIHILATES Smart-Aleck Student Accusing Him of Propaganda", "Charlie Kirk wrecks DEI talking points", and "Liberal Student Can't Answer Charlie Kirk's Simple Question", while conveniently not showing all the times when he was the one whose talking points got wrecked or who couldn't answer a simple question.
www.theguardian.com

The students who debated with Charlie Kirk: ‘His goal was to verbally defeat us’

Young liberals challenged Kirk’s conservative views on the viral YouTube series Surrounded – an ‘unnerving’ spectacle, according to a rhetoric expert
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
kevtronics said:
But not in good faith. His claim to fame was taking clips from his "debates" and posting them on social media with clickbait titles like "Charlie Kirk ANNIHILATES Smart-Aleck Student Accusing Him of Propaganda", "Charlie Kirk wrecks DEI talking points", and "Liberal Student Can't Answer Charlie Kirk's Simple Question", while conveniently not showing all the times when he was the one whose talking points got wrecked or who couldn't answer a simple question.
www.theguardian.com

The students who debated with Charlie Kirk: ‘His goal was to verbally defeat us’

Young liberals challenged Kirk’s conservative views on the viral YouTube series Surrounded – an ‘unnerving’ spectacle, according to a rhetoric expert
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...
I do believe there was one time where he admitted that one of the people debating him really did a number on him and was impressed.
 
TheBigA said:
That kind of thing happens here on this message board, and it often infuriates the other poster to the point where the discussion devolves into angry name-calling and personal attacks. People are passionate about their beliefs. On both sides. Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes the bear eats you.
Click to expand...
I sorta ignore those and if in the vicinity will walk away. Don't wanna go to jail. I just tell people "Never piss off an Irishman. You won't believe what'll happen to you." [Of course, that was in my way younger years. If I tried to take a swing at somebody now, I'd probably dislocate a hip, snap a wrist and have a heart attack.]
 


Back
Top Bottom