"Live and local" has been glamorized and romanticized quite a bit on these boards, but small stations that are "live and local" often have very little money! And the first place where they always want to cut is employee pay! They pay employees as little as possible (usually minimum wage), and then they try to wring as much work as possible out of those employees for what little chicken feed that they actually
do pay! Direct quote from one former GM: "Don't expect to get paid for everything you do!" (And he probably
still wonders why that station failed under his "management." :

)
My first station was "live and local" to the extreme, doing remotes from events as dull and mundane as ribbon cuttings! BORRRINNNGGG! Ribbon cuttings are more suited to a photo in the local paper. But the GM at my first station covered
everything! That station was so "live and local" that they apparently couldn't even afford to pay for a national news network! So we only had "local" news! And this was in 1990-1991 during the first Persian Gulf War! We had a TV monitor in our studio tuned to CNN, and we "reported" whatever we heard and saw there. That had to pass for "national news." Once I mentioned "CNN is reporting..." and the station management acted like I used four-letter words on the air!

Well, give us a national news network and you wouldn't have had that problem! Other stations reported
real news via their networks, while we "reported" on fish fries and other PSAs, and called
that "news"! That station was a sick, sad joke! We couldn't even play music published, or even co-published, by ASCAP because that station owed ASCAP money! Take a look at your record collection, and you will see that that
really thinned out our playlist to almost nothing!
That brand of "live and local"? You can keep it!
