w00t said:
I seriously don't know the actual answer to this, but my stab in the dark...
Radio needs to capture you NOW. You're punching the buttons, you need a song you know NOW. RIGHT NOW. Not later, and they know if you don't know the song you're going to keep punching (and maybe not come back for a long time -- again, that's not NOW).
In the grocery store you have a captive audience who's more focused on which brand of milk will save them 15 cents. They don't care what's playing, and they probably want something relaxing. You're not going to run from Food Lion and drive straight to Lowe's Foods because you didn't like the song. But, if 101.5 is playing something you don't like, it's not hard to push the button and go to 103.3.
Very important point! A byproduct of which is why we have such awful AM radios.
In order to do this, we give away the ability to TUNE, rather than select at fixed 10 khz steps "on freq".
Another discussion on engineering would show how institutionalized "bad AM" sound has been created by this "concept".
As soon as manufacturers began to address pushbutton select on radios (1937), the actual performance of the
radio was a step lower than when an "extra" RF gain preselector stage was state of the art.
Well, except for car radios with the cam-and-coil rocker, which was built like a tank, but only gave 5 or 6 presets,
and you had to remember which were for AM/FM.
Back to the point, maybe the NAB should lobby for limits on punch rate, or a timer, or something to prevent all
this bouncing around. The radio would just be stuck for a while after too many changes too soon.
It could unlock after 30 minutes or so.
On the retail sales music,
I've noticed this too. A month ago in Baton Rouge at gas station where I heard two songs somewhat off the beaten oldies
path that I have on my pt 15 format. They were both songs once overplayed, dropped many years off oldies if they ever were
in "oldies", but stand up well in retrospect. Neither one was " Pictures of Matchstick Men" but I play that too.