radiopilot said:
vsa said:
JJS said:
Orbitcast, satellite radio's foremost news blog, has respectful if not reverent coverage of "over 50 [HD Radio] products being displayed at more than 25 booths across the show."
http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/hd-radio-increases-presence-at-ces.html
"...Samsung, iBiquity and others will announce at CES...that MP3 players, cell phones and personal navigation devices will integrate HD Radio reception into their mobile devices. So that means that you'll be able to listen to HD Radio on your cell phone - and it sounds like Samsung is right on board..."
But pro-HD radio spin-doctors here have insisted that nobody is interested in listening to "radio" on their cell phone.
We've all heard how HD will make inroads into everything including my bagel toaster, and I don't doubt the money is being greased into these manufacturers by Ibiquity and the NAB, but as far as consumers are concerned do you really think having HD radio into these mp3/satelite players going to make them listen to radio instead of the stored music?
I mean my mp3 player right now has an FM tuner BUT I never turn it on to listen to, and I bet most people don't turn on the FM tuner on it either... Heck if Ibiquity was so bold why not try to get laptop makers to install the HD radio chipset into them but do you think the user would listen to terrestrial radio on his laptop or the myriad of thousands of internet radio stations at his/her fingertips?
Why have soybean flank steak instead of the real filet mignon?
Radiopilot
I love this thread. It's a perfect example of the anti mob's mode of operation.
Here's how the threads go..
1) Some webcasting or DXing advocate posts "HD radio "is Doomed" / "Has Already Died" / "Sucks". Here's proof."...
2) Poster then displays a link with "limited"/"a little"/"No" relavance to the point they claim.
3) Someone ELSE points out, in usually no more than a single sentence, that the original poster's point is almost totally without merit based on "physical evidence"/ "database links" / "common cense".
4) OP diverts attention away from their ORIGINAL bogus claim and asserts that "radio is dead anyway" / "Internet radio rules" / "The iPod has killed radio" .
5) OP then claims anyone not agreeing with their bogus claim is "in the business" / "on the payroll" / "out of touch" because they know from personal experience as a "medical sales rep" / "military contractor" / "'between gigs' swing DJ"/ "out of radio college instructor" / "Pizza Delivery Guy" that the radio business has no clue....
Sound familiar?
It should. It's played out in MANY threads on this board every month.
Clouseau