• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

HD RADIO SIGNAL MUCH WEAKER THEN FM ANALOG-EXTERNAL ANTENNA REQUIRED

S

SUPERCASTER

Source information for my statements about the necessity of an external antenna for HD radio even when a more then adequate analog signal was present without the additional antenna:NPR Labs IBOC Field Service Bulletin No. 02.20060216, Feb. 16, 2006An article by Chriss Scherer about the NPR tests are published in the supplimental insert "Insight to IBOC", Radio May, 2006That pretty much blows away all the wild claims by HD Radio supporters about signal parity for analog FM and HD coverage.Now if we could just get the HD Radio supporters to admit to all the other false or inflated claims.I believe HD Radio may just be the next ENRON.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom