• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Hemmert Makes Radio Hall Of Fame, Dahl Does Not

I've not kept up with Dahl at all, though I listened to him all the time, as a kid.

Is he still being punished for the Comisky Park Disco Fiasco?
 
DToTheJ said:
Also, NPR's Carl Kasell beats out Howard Stern in the active national personality category.
Click to expand...
...Howard's been telling people on the air NOT to vote for him in Bruce DuMont's joke of a museum. That he isn't already in, while Limbaugh was ballot-stuffed into it in 1992(?!!?), shows how huge a joke it is. Norman Corwin was added to it the same year as Limbaugh but refused to attend, so as to not have to share a stage with that fascist blowhard......
 
Ultimajock said:
DToTheJ said:
Also, NPR's Carl Kasell beats out Howard Stern in the active national personality category.
Click to expand...
...Howard's been telling people on the air NOT to vote for him in Bruce DuMont's joke of a museum. That he isn't already in, while Limbaugh was ballot-stuffed into it in 1992(?!!?), shows how huge a joke it is. Norman Corwin was added to it the same year as Limbaugh but refused to attend, so as to not have to share a stage with that fascist blowhard......
Click to expand...

Not everybody agrees with your opinion on Limbaugh as his ratings prove.
 
Just wondering WHY Howards opinion is great, (he's not on the radio anymore, is he?)

....but Rush is a "facist blowhard."

Does someone have their crabby pants on today?
 
Can anyone look at the quality of the work of a personality, while turning off the personal biases to do it.

I can understand why a lot of people do not like his politics. This is America..you are entitled.
When you look at the quality of his work; production, preparedness, able to keep an audience when you cannot stand
the message, you must give credit where credit is due.
 
Dear Hoos, with all due respect, the answer is NO.

"Quality of his work." Howard Stern = an 11 year old boy with his first woodie, a giggly kid telling dirty jokes all day. See? quality to me is wgn. You surely disagree.

YOUR personal biases are quite different than mine, or even than the kind people who attempt to censor this board.

"Quality" is CERTAINLY subjective. Quality to ME is NOT Stern, or Dahl. You and Mr. Ultimajock probably enjoy Jerry Lewis, too. Not me.
 
Prais said:
Dear Hoos, with all due respect, the answer is NO.

"Quality of his work." Howard Stern = an 11 year old boy with his first woodie, a giggly kid telling dirty jokes all day. See? quality to me is wgn. You surely disagree.

YOUR personal biases are quite different than mine, or even than the kind people who attempt to censor this board.

"Quality" is CERTAINLY subjective. Quality to ME is NOT Stern, or Dahl. You and Mr. Ultimajock probably enjoy Jerry Lewis, too. Not me.
Click to expand...

Prais, I am not a fan of Howard Stern. I was meaning the like of Limbaugh, Paul Harvey, etc. While I know they are right leaning
commentators, you do not get audience numbers consistently over a period of years by being boring and repetitve.What I was saying was take the political biases out of the equation and look at their work as a whole.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom