• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Holiday Disappointment - Boston Radio Ain't What It uSed To Be!

D

DelcoGrrl

Guest
Man, where do I start?

Grew up listening to Kiss/Jam'n and all the other great stations in Boston. Came back for Thanksgiving and, WOW, all I can say is WHAT HAPPENED?

Especially to Kiss 108!

Aside from Matty and his crew, the station is filled with a bunch of true amateurs. I mean 10 years ago every single one of these "jocks" wouldn't have been on Kiss on weekend overnights! I mean, they'd be lucky to be answering the phones for the weekend jocks!

Seriously, I'm sure they're nice people, but what on earth is the PD thinking? Is he just the laziest person to ever program a radio station? Or the cheapest?

I mean look at other heritage stations around the country--owned by the same company I might add--KIIS, WHTZ, their talent is superb! Even JAM'N doesn't sound as bad as Kiss. It's really heartbreaking to see such a legendary station be run by a bunch of ppl who have no idea how lucky they are and, I'm sorry, have NO BUSINESS being on the air there.

Bring back John Ivey!

Or Steve Rivers!

(even better--channel Sunny Joe--but please Cadillac, DO SOMETHING! You're the laughing stock of the entire industry.)

DG Out!
 
I'll have to disagree.
I think the current state of KISS is good.
Besides Matty - yes - the jocks are young, but FAR from amateur-sounding.
Radio has changed since 1985 and even 1995 and KISS reflects the current "sound" of CHR to me.
I think their current jock line-up is strong and has the promise to get stronger over time.

Those were harsh words for a station I'm enjoying very much at the moment.
Happy Holidays!




> Man, where do I start?
>
> Grew up listening to Kiss/Jam'n and all the other great
> stations in Boston. Came back for Thanksgiving and, WOW, all
> I can say is WHAT HAPPENED?
>
> Especially to Kiss 108!
>
> Aside from Matty and his crew, the station is filled with a
> bunch of true amateurs. I mean 10 years ago every single one
> of these "jocks" wouldn't have been on Kiss on weekend
> overnights! I mean, they'd be lucky to be answering the
> phones for the weekend jocks!
>
> Seriously, I'm sure they're nice people, but what on earth
> is the PD thinking? Is he just the laziest person to ever
> program a radio station? Or the cheapest?
>
> I mean look at other heritage stations around the
> country--owned by the same company I might add--KIIS, WHTZ,
> their talent is superb! Even JAM'N doesn't sound as bad as
> Kiss. It's really heartbreaking to see such a legendary
> station be run by a bunch of ppl who have no idea how lucky
> they are and, I'm sorry, have NO BUSINESS being on the air
> there.
>
> Bring back John Ivey!
>
> Or Steve Rivers!
>
> (even better--channel Sunny Joe--but please Cadillac, DO
> SOMETHING! You're the laughing stock of the entire
> industry.)
>
> DG Out!
>
 
I'll agree. Of course radio has changed since 1985 and of course it's changed since 1995, but LISTEN to the other great legendary CHR's around the country. I'm not talking about age or experience, some of the best out there are 19 or 20 others are 40, but the WXKS jocks today have no "show biz" sensibilities. The 2005 jock, based on what you hear in the Top 10 markets seems to be "Real" and "Natural" sounding with a real sense of showmanship. The Kiss jocks, again I'm sure they're nice people, but they just sound like amateurs to me. Nohting relatble, nothing entertaining, just pimping the station and talking up the ramps. Boring.









> I'll have to disagree.
> I think the current state of KISS is good.
> Besides Matty - yes - the jocks are young, but FAR from
> amateur-sounding.
> Radio has changed since 1985 and even 1995 and KISS reflects
> the current "sound" of CHR to me.
> I think their current jock line-up is strong and has the
> promise to get stronger over time.
>
> Those were harsh words for a station I'm enjoying very much
> at the moment.
> Happy Holidays!
>
>
>
>
> > Man, where do I start?
> >
> > Grew up listening to Kiss/Jam'n and all the other great
> > stations in Boston. Came back for Thanksgiving and, WOW,
> all
> > I can say is WHAT HAPPENED?
> >
> > Especially to Kiss 108!
> >
> > Aside from Matty and his crew, the station is filled with
> a
> > bunch of true amateurs. I mean 10 years ago every single
> one
> > of these "jocks" wouldn't have been on Kiss on weekend
> > overnights! I mean, they'd be lucky to be answering the
> > phones for the weekend jocks!
> >
> > Seriously, I'm sure they're nice people, but what on earth
>
> > is the PD thinking? Is he just the laziest person to ever
> > program a radio station? Or the cheapest?
> >
> > I mean look at other heritage stations around the
> > country--owned by the same company I might add--KIIS,
> WHTZ,
> > their talent is superb! Even JAM'N doesn't sound as bad as
>
> > Kiss. It's really heartbreaking to see such a legendary
> > station be run by a bunch of ppl who have no idea how
> lucky
> > they are and, I'm sorry, have NO BUSINESS being on the air
>
> > there.
> >
> > Bring back John Ivey!
> >
> > Or Steve Rivers!
> >
> > (even better--channel Sunny Joe--but please Cadillac, DO
> > SOMETHING! You're the laughing stock of the entire
> > industry.)
> >
> > DG Out!
> >
>
 
Give some examples. I'm having a hard time following. When did you listen? What did you hear? I listened tonight with your comments in mind and couldn't disagree with you more. No liner card breaks. Tons of entertaining phone calls. Lots of energy. Get a little more specific please.

Did you possibly hear an 'off day?' Just wondering.




> I'll agree. Of course radio has changed since 1985 and of
> course it's changed since 1995, but LISTEN to the other
> great legendary CHR's around the country. I'm not talking
> about age or experience, some of the best out there are 19
> or 20 others are 40, but the WXKS jocks today have no "show
> biz" sensibilities. The 2005 jock, based on what you hear in
> the Top 10 markets seems to be "Real" and "Natural" sounding
> with a real sense of showmanship. The Kiss jocks, again I'm
> sure they're nice people, but they just sound like amateurs
> to me. Nohting relatble, nothing entertaining, just pimping
> the station and talking up the ramps. Boring.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I'll have to disagree.
> > I think the current state of KISS is good.
> > Besides Matty - yes - the jocks are young, but FAR from
> > amateur-sounding.
> > Radio has changed since 1985 and even 1995 and KISS
> reflects
> > the current "sound" of CHR to me.
> > I think their current jock line-up is strong and has the
> > promise to get stronger over time.
> >
> > Those were harsh words for a station I'm enjoying very
> much
> > at the moment.
> > Happy Holidays!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Man, where do I start?
> > >
> > > Grew up listening to Kiss/Jam'n and all the other great
> > > stations in Boston. Came back for Thanksgiving and, WOW,
>
> > all
> > > I can say is WHAT HAPPENED?
> > >
> > > Especially to Kiss 108!
> > >
> > > Aside from Matty and his crew, the station is filled
> with
> > a
> > > bunch of true amateurs. I mean 10 years ago every single
>
> > one
> > > of these "jocks" wouldn't have been on Kiss on weekend
> > > overnights! I mean, they'd be lucky to be answering the
> > > phones for the weekend jocks!
> > >
> > > Seriously, I'm sure they're nice people, but what on
> earth
> >
> > > is the PD thinking? Is he just the laziest person to
> ever
> > > program a radio station? Or the cheapest?
> > >
> > > I mean look at other heritage stations around the
> > > country--owned by the same company I might add--KIIS,
> > WHTZ,
> > > their talent is superb! Even JAM'N doesn't sound as bad
> as
> >
> > > Kiss. It's really heartbreaking to see such a legendary
> > > station be run by a bunch of ppl who have no idea how
> > lucky
> > > they are and, I'm sorry, have NO BUSINESS being on the
> air
> >
> > > there.
> > >
> > > Bring back John Ivey!
> > >
> > > Or Steve Rivers!
> > >
> > > (even better--channel Sunny Joe--but please Cadillac, DO
>
> > > SOMETHING! You're the laughing stock of the entire
> > > industry.)
> > >
> > > DG Out!
> > >
> >
>
 
> Have Arty the One Man Party or Marc Clark been heard
> anywhere lately?

I believe Arty is in Charlotte and Marc Clark resurfaced briefly on JAMN.As far as the original post I would by no means call anyone at KISS an amateur but the station isn't what it used to be.I think it's more a matter of medium market talent working in Boston.
 
Well, look. Lets not anyone get into an arguement here. I think the statement made in the second post of this thread is the answer here. This isn't 1985. I can't single out one example of a 'poor' jock. What I will say is that since Telcom 96, the bar has been substantially lowered across the board, in every top 50 market. There are some stations with 'heritage' jocks (WODS being notable in Boston) who still sound like they did back in the day, but overall, the state of CHR (especially) is not what it was even 10 years ago. That I must agree with.

Jocks today are representative of the diminishing pay scale for those left doing a live airshift these days. How many of these CHR stations are voice tracked after dark? Maybe not in Boston (I don't know but I could guess), but in *most* markets, AC and CHR stations are VT'd at LEAST midnight to 5am. Many AC stations are VT'd starting at 6pm. You absolutely can NOT get the same sound out of voice tracks that you can with a live jock. Some people are very good at VT'ing and can get close but even with the best VT modules available in Scott Studios, there are still limitations.

And, even where the stations are mostly live, stations these days don't want a 'jock'... they want someone who lives to watch TRL, Survivor island and who wants to talk about the latest gossip in Hollywood... They don't get that with most jocks they hire so they hire someone who will work cheap, attend every small station event & basically live at the station. Working cheap being the prime concern, since with corporate radio, investor relations dictate an ever-dropping bottom line.

Gang, it's not fair to blame the talent on the air... they are only as good as their coach - the PD. If he doesn't want someone sounding better than HE/SHE does, there's part of your answer. If he/she doesn't bother doing aircheck sessions, that's also part of the answer.

When I go on the air, part of my showprep consists of listening to old 80s CHR airchecks to refresh my memory of how it used to be... Part of it consists of at least glancing at the lastest news just in case I get asked by a listener, or it comes up in the course of a show and I don't have a DUUH moment. And yes it helps to know what artist is up for an award or what actress is getting divorced... but thats not the ONLY thing that matters.

There's a ton of reasons for it, but you are right. Radio ain't what it used to be, and for me, Boston is a major league disappointment. The Boston market used to be the best sounding radio market in the country. Now, trust me, Memphis, the market I just left, sounds as good as Boston. Memphis. Market #49

Again, I don't think anyone in Boston is *bad*... just a product of the industry as a whole in 2005. And that's one reason satellite radio & ipods and the like are chewing such a large portion of the audience. Programmers in general just don't get it and management, people who come from a sales background instead of programming REALLY don't get it. Some exceptions are out there, of course, but generally speaking the bottom line for investors is running the whole damn industry. And it is sad.

OH, exaples... how about examples of those who DID get it right back in the day... JoJo Kincaid, Mighty Mike Osborne, Frank Kingston Smith... and some recent & current folks still around like J.J. Wright & Dale Dorman. Or Dave Maynard. Actually there's too many people to even mention let alone remember. Those examples were and are communicators. How many communicators do we have in Boston today?

> Give some examples. I'm having a hard time following. When
> did you listen? What did you hear? I listened tonight with
> your comments in mind and couldn't disagree with you more.
> No liner card breaks. Tons of entertaining phone calls.
> Lots of energy. Get a little more specific please.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
 
I agree that Boston has been FILLED with great jocks/communicators of the past. Who could argue against that? I'm asking for examples of who we're complaining about today and why, because A) we've been generalizing every jock that works at a certain station and B) I just don't hear it.
No arguing - just disagreeing - and trying to understand.


> Well, look. Lets not anyone get into an arguement here. I
> think the statement made in the second post of this thread
> is the answer here. This isn't 1985. I can't single out
> one example of a 'poor' jock. What I will say is that since
> Telcom 96, the bar has been substantially lowered across the
> board, in every top 50 market. There are some stations with
> 'heritage' jocks (WODS being notable in Boston) who still
> sound like they did back in the day, but overall, the state
> of CHR (especially) is not what it was even 10 years ago.
> That I must agree with.
>
> Jocks today are representative of the diminishing pay scale
> for those left doing a live airshift these days. How many
> of these CHR stations are voice tracked after dark? Maybe
> not in Boston (I don't know but I could guess), but in
> *most* markets, AC and CHR stations are VT'd at LEAST
> midnight to 5am. Many AC stations are VT'd starting at 6pm.
> You absolutely can NOT get the same sound out of voice
> tracks that you can with a live jock. Some people are very
> good at VT'ing and can get close but even with the best VT
> modules available in Scott Studios, there are still
> limitations.
>
> And, even where the stations are mostly live, stations these
> days don't want a 'jock'... they want someone who lives to
> watch TRL, Survivor island and who wants to talk about the
> latest gossip in Hollywood... They don't get that with most
> jocks they hire so they hire someone who will work cheap,
> attend every small station event & basically live at the
> station. Working cheap being the prime concern, since with
> corporate radio, investor relations dictate an ever-dropping
> bottom line.
>
> Gang, it's not fair to blame the talent on the air... they
> are only as good as their coach - the PD. If he doesn't
> want someone sounding better than HE/SHE does, there's part
> of your answer. If he/she doesn't bother doing aircheck
> sessions, that's also part of the answer.
>
> When I go on the air, part of my showprep consists of
> listening to old 80s CHR airchecks to refresh my memory of
> how it used to be... Part of it consists of at least
> glancing at the lastest news just in case I get asked by a
> listener, or it comes up in the course of a show and I don't
> have a DUUH moment. And yes it helps to know what artist is
> up for an award or what actress is getting divorced... but
> thats not the ONLY thing that matters.
>
> There's a ton of reasons for it, but you are right. Radio
> ain't what it used to be, and for me, Boston is a major
> league disappointment. The Boston market used to be the
> best sounding radio market in the country. Now, trust me,
> Memphis, the market I just left, sounds as good as Boston.
> Memphis. Market #49
>
> Again, I don't think anyone in Boston is *bad*... just a
> product of the industry as a whole in 2005. And that's one
> reason satellite radio & ipods and the like are chewing such
> a large portion of the audience. Programmers in general
> just don't get it and management, people who come from a
> sales background instead of programming REALLY don't get it.
> Some exceptions are out there, of course, but generally
> speaking the bottom line for investors is running the whole
> damn industry. And it is sad.
>
> OH, exaples... how about examples of those who DID get it
> right back in the day... JoJo Kincaid, Mighty Mike Osborne,
> Frank Kingston Smith... and some recent & current folks
> still around like J.J. Wright & Dale Dorman. Or Dave
> Maynard. Actually there's too many people to even mention
> let alone remember. Those examples were and are
> communicators. How many communicators do we have in Boston
> today?
>
> > Give some examples. I'm having a hard time following.
> When
> > did you listen? What did you hear? I listened tonight
> with
> > your comments in mind and couldn't disagree with you more.
>
> > No liner card breaks. Tons of entertaining phone calls.
> > Lots of energy. Get a little more specific please.
>
 
I have to say that I agree with you in disagreeing with the original poster. Although I do agree with everything Steve said, it seems as though he hasn't really given Kiss a listen lately, so he's making more general statements, not statements that directly apply to Kiss.

The jocks on Kiss today aren't heritage jocks from great top 40 stations of the past, necessarily. But those heritage/legendary jocks are no longer relatable really to Kiss' target demo in today's world anymore.

That said, I think Deirdra and Romeo! are outstanding and relate quite well to the target demo. I'm not as much a fan of Jackson Blue, but nonetheless, he's solid and his show is very upbeat with plenty of audience interaction. None of these jocks are liner card readers.

Further, the original poster made a comment about Cadillac and Kiss being the laughing stock of the industry. I don't think that could be further from the truth. Cadillac knows exactly what he's doing and the proof is in the pudding. Kiss and Jam'n stay right on top consistently in every single ratings book. Furthermore, Kiss stays on top consistently at a time when many CHRs nationwide are experiencing significant ratings drops.

> I agree that Boston has been FILLED with great
> jocks/communicators of the past. Who could argue against
> that? I'm asking for examples of who we're complaining
> about today and why, because A) we've been generalizing
> every jock that works at a certain station and B) I just
> don't hear it.
> No arguing - just disagreeing - and trying to understand.
>
>
> > Well, look. Lets not anyone get into an arguement here.
> I
> > think the statement made in the second post of this thread
>
> > is the answer here. This isn't 1985. I can't single out
> > one example of a 'poor' jock. What I will say is that
> since
> > Telcom 96, the bar has been substantially lowered across
> the
> > board, in every top 50 market. There are some stations
> with
> > 'heritage' jocks (WODS being notable in Boston) who still
> > sound like they did back in the day, but overall, the
> state
> > of CHR (especially) is not what it was even 10 years ago.
>
> > That I must agree with.
> >
> > Jocks today are representative of the diminishing pay
> scale
> > for those left doing a live airshift these days. How many
>
> > of these CHR stations are voice tracked after dark? Maybe
>
> > not in Boston (I don't know but I could guess), but in
> > *most* markets, AC and CHR stations are VT'd at LEAST
> > midnight to 5am. Many AC stations are VT'd starting at
> 6pm.
> > You absolutely can NOT get the same sound out of voice
> > tracks that you can with a live jock. Some people are
> very
> > good at VT'ing and can get close but even with the best VT
>
> > modules available in Scott Studios, there are still
> > limitations.
> >
> > And, even where the stations are mostly live, stations
> these
> > days don't want a 'jock'... they want someone who lives to
>
> > watch TRL, Survivor island and who wants to talk about the
>
> > latest gossip in Hollywood... They don't get that with
> most
> > jocks they hire so they hire someone who will work cheap,
> > attend every small station event & basically live at the
> > station. Working cheap being the prime concern, since
> with
> > corporate radio, investor relations dictate an
> ever-dropping
> > bottom line.
> >
> > Gang, it's not fair to blame the talent on the air... they
>
> > are only as good as their coach - the PD. If he doesn't
> > want someone sounding better than HE/SHE does, there's
> part
> > of your answer. If he/she doesn't bother doing aircheck
> > sessions, that's also part of the answer.
> >
> > When I go on the air, part of my showprep consists of
> > listening to old 80s CHR airchecks to refresh my memory of
>
> > how it used to be... Part of it consists of at least
> > glancing at the lastest news just in case I get asked by a
>
> > listener, or it comes up in the course of a show and I
> don't
> > have a DUUH moment. And yes it helps to know what artist
> is
> > up for an award or what actress is getting divorced... but
>
> > thats not the ONLY thing that matters.
> >
> > There's a ton of reasons for it, but you are right. Radio
>
> > ain't what it used to be, and for me, Boston is a major
> > league disappointment. The Boston market used to be the
> > best sounding radio market in the country. Now, trust me,
>
> > Memphis, the market I just left, sounds as good as Boston.
>
> > Memphis. Market #49
> >
> > Again, I don't think anyone in Boston is *bad*... just a
> > product of the industry as a whole in 2005. And that's
> one
> > reason satellite radio & ipods and the like are chewing
> such
> > a large portion of the audience. Programmers in general
> > just don't get it and management, people who come from a
> > sales background instead of programming REALLY don't get
> it.
> > Some exceptions are out there, of course, but generally
> > speaking the bottom line for investors is running the
> whole
> > damn industry. And it is sad.
> >
> > OH, exaples... how about examples of those who DID get it
> > right back in the day... JoJo Kincaid, Mighty Mike
> Osborne,
> > Frank Kingston Smith... and some recent & current folks
> > still around like J.J. Wright & Dale Dorman. Or Dave
> > Maynard. Actually there's too many people to even mention
>
> > let alone remember. Those examples were and are
> > communicators. How many communicators do we have in
> Boston
> > today?
> >
> > > Give some examples. I'm having a hard time following.
> > When
> > > did you listen? What did you hear? I listened tonight
> > with
> > > your comments in mind and couldn't disagree with you
> more.
> >
> > > No liner card breaks. Tons of entertaining phone calls.
>
> > > Lots of energy. Get a little more specific please.
> >
>
 
> There's a ton of reasons for it, but you are right. Radio
> ain't what it used to be, and for me, Boston is a major
> league disappointment. The Boston market used to be the
> best sounding radio market in the country. Now, trust me,
> Memphis, the market I just left, sounds as good as Boston.
> Memphis. Market #49
>
> Again, I don't think anyone in Boston is *bad*... just a
> product of the industry as a whole in 2005. And that's one
> reason satellite radio & ipods and the like are chewing such
> a large portion of the audience. Programmers in general
> just don't get it and management, people who come from a
> sales background instead of programming REALLY don't get it.

But by and large management people have ALWAYS come from sales. I'm not sure management "got it" any more back in the good old days than they do now. Not that I'm disagreeing with what you say, but there was a lot of bad radio back then too.

Ipods are nothing more than a digital walkman. Yeah, it's easier to download an assortment of songs than it was to make a tape, but the principle is the same. I don't see what the big deal is about satellite radio. The programming isn't (imho) noticeably better than terrestrial radio (certainly the presentation is equally dull...it too is mostly voicetracked)...the big difference is that there are a bunch of really narrow formats that don't attract enough of an audience individually to ever make it as a standalone station.
 
It's Kiss, who cares?

> I'll have to disagree.
> I think the current state of KISS is good.
> Besides Matty - yes - the jocks are young, but FAR from
> amateur-sounding.
> Radio has changed since 1985 and even 1995 and KISS reflects
> the current "sound" of CHR to me.
> I think their current jock line-up is strong and has the
> promise to get stronger over time.
>
> Those were harsh words for a station I'm enjoying very much
> at the moment.
> Happy Holidays!
>
>
>
>
> > Man, where do I start?
> >
> > Grew up listening to Kiss/Jam'n and all the other great
> > stations in Boston. Came back for Thanksgiving and, WOW,
> all
> > I can say is WHAT HAPPENED?
> >
> > Especially to Kiss 108!
> >
> > Aside from Matty and his crew, the station is filled with
> a
> > bunch of true amateurs. I mean 10 years ago every single
> one
> > of these "jocks" wouldn't have been on Kiss on weekend
> > overnights! I mean, they'd be lucky to be answering the
> > phones for the weekend jocks!
> >
> > Seriously, I'm sure they're nice people, but what on earth
>
> > is the PD thinking? Is he just the laziest person to ever
> > program a radio station? Or the cheapest?
> >
> > I mean look at other heritage stations around the
> > country--owned by the same company I might add--KIIS,
> WHTZ,
> > their talent is superb! Even JAM'N doesn't sound as bad as
>
> > Kiss. It's really heartbreaking to see such a legendary
> > station be run by a bunch of ppl who have no idea how
> lucky
> > they are and, I'm sorry, have NO BUSINESS being on the air
>
> > there.
> >
> > Bring back John Ivey!
> >
> > Or Steve Rivers!
> >
> > (even better--channel Sunny Joe--but please Cadillac, DO
> > SOMETHING! You're the laughing stock of the entire
> > industry.)
> >
> > DG Out!
> >
>

Who cares? Kiss is a CHR station , of course their jocks will sound young, after all the extent of their phone conversations is trying to chat with screaming teenage girls.

Their audience doesn't know better....nor does it care to know better.

I can only listen to Kiss for about 10 minutes. The jocks are CONSTANTLY plugging some event. Yikes. I'd love for once for their jocks to speak like normal people, not corporate mouthpieces.
 
Re: It's Kiss, who cares?

> "Who cares? Kiss is a CHR station , of course their jocks
> will sound young, after all the extent of their phone
> conversations is trying to chat with screaming teenage
> girls."


Thank you Mr. Cliche.
 
I agree, Steve, those names you mentioned are and were "communicators." We also have to remember, though, that the market has shrunk considerably in recent years with so few companies buying up so many stations. That's a whole other topic.
That being said, though, Boston radio still "reaches" people. Kids still listen to the popular music stations, people are still calling the various versions of talk radio, and sports radio still unites fans. I know many who turned down the TV volume during last year's World Series to hear Joe and Jerry on WEEI.
In years to come, our children will probably lament the loss of what to them will be "classic" voices.

> Well, look. Lets not anyone get into an arguement here. I
> think the statement made in the second post of this thread
> is the answer here. This isn't 1985. I can't single out
> one example of a 'poor' jock. What I will say is that since
> Telcom 96, the bar has been substantially lowered across the
> board, in every top 50 market. There are some stations with
> 'heritage' jocks (WODS being notable in Boston) who still
> sound like they did back in the day, but overall, the state
> of CHR (especially) is not what it was even 10 years ago.
> That I must agree with.
>
> Jocks today are representative of the diminishing pay scale
> for those left doing a live airshift these days. How many
> of these CHR stations are voice tracked after dark? Maybe
> not in Boston (I don't know but I could guess), but in
> *most* markets, AC and CHR stations are VT'd at LEAST
> midnight to 5am. Many AC stations are VT'd starting at 6pm.
> You absolutely can NOT get the same sound out of voice
> tracks that you can with a live jock. Some people are very
> good at VT'ing and can get close but even with the best VT
> modules available in Scott Studios, there are still
> limitations.
>
> And, even where the stations are mostly live, stations these
> days don't want a 'jock'... they want someone who lives to
> watch TRL, Survivor island and who wants to talk about the
> latest gossip in Hollywood... They don't get that with most
> jocks they hire so they hire someone who will work cheap,
> attend every small station event & basically live at the
> station. Working cheap being the prime concern, since with
> corporate radio, investor relations dictate an ever-dropping
> bottom line.
>
> Gang, it's not fair to blame the talent on the air... they
> are only as good as their coach - the PD. If he doesn't
> want someone sounding better than HE/SHE does, there's part
> of your answer. If he/she doesn't bother doing aircheck
> sessions, that's also part of the answer.
>
> When I go on the air, part of my showprep consists of
> listening to old 80s CHR airchecks to refresh my memory of
> how it used to be... Part of it consists of at least
> glancing at the lastest news just in case I get asked by a
> listener, or it comes up in the course of a show and I don't
> have a DUUH moment. And yes it helps to know what artist is
> up for an award or what actress is getting divorced... but
> thats not the ONLY thing that matters.
>
> There's a ton of reasons for it, but you are right. Radio
> ain't what it used to be, and for me, Boston is a major
> league disappointment. The Boston market used to be the
> best sounding radio market in the country. Now, trust me,
> Memphis, the market I just left, sounds as good as Boston.
> Memphis. Market #49
>
> Again, I don't think anyone in Boston is *bad*... just a
> product of the industry as a whole in 2005. And that's one
> reason satellite radio & ipods and the like are chewing such
> a large portion of the audience. Programmers in general
> just don't get it and management, people who come from a
> sales background instead of programming REALLY don't get it.
> Some exceptions are out there, of course, but generally
> speaking the bottom line for investors is running the whole
> damn industry. And it is sad.
>
> OH, exaples... how about examples of those who DID get it
> right back in the day... JoJo Kincaid, Mighty Mike Osborne,
> Frank Kingston Smith... and some recent & current folks
> still around like J.J. Wright & Dale Dorman. Or Dave
> Maynard. Actually there's too many people to even mention
> let alone remember. Those examples were and are
> communicators. How many communicators do we have in Boston
> today?
>
> > Give some examples. I'm having a hard time following.
> When
> > did you listen? What did you hear? I listened tonight
> with
> > your comments in mind and couldn't disagree with you more.
>
> > No liner card breaks. Tons of entertaining phone calls.
> > Lots of energy. Get a little more specific please.
>
 
Re: It's Kiss, who cares?

It's true, that's the format. Back in the 80's, there were some differences between CHRs. But today, every CHR sounds the same. But this is because Boston is a one format market. When that happens, you get a lot of stations in the same format, that all sound the same.

Believe me there used to be a whole lot more to CHR than just talking to screaming teenagers. But today, most markets have 1 CHR, and there is little difference between CHRs in different markets. Just spend a few minutes listening to KIIS FM and then Kiss108 online, and you'll see what I mena. Didn't used to be like this.

And no, it has NOTHING to do with Clear-channl. It's because there's no competition, and the listener loses.

> >
>
> Who cares? Kiss is a CHR station , of course their jocks
> will sound young, after all the extent of their phone
> conversations is trying to chat with screaming teenage
> girls.
>
> Their audience doesn't know better....nor does it care to
> know better.
>
> I can only listen to Kiss for about 10 minutes. The jocks
> are CONSTANTLY plugging some event. Yikes. I'd love for
> once for their jocks to speak like normal people, not
> corporate mouthpieces.
>
 
To be fair I've only listened a small amount to Kiss. It's not bad. No they don't have heritage jocks, but I agree that to a large degree the 'heritage' way of announcing songs is definitely out with regard to CHR stations. The kids today don't have JUST the radio but with VH1 and some other video outlets like Yahoo! Music, video on MySpace.com, in addition to mp3 players and home burnt/traded CDs. That's what the kids are into today... trust me I have a 15 and a 17 year old here. They *DON'T* want a dj on the radio who doesn't speak like they do... and, at the risk of sounding old, the kids today fall into one of two categories: Either they are into this Gothic Alternative/Modern Rock & New Metal or they are into Hip Hop & Rap.

I guess with that statement I'm lending credence to the chorus of posters this last year that said there's not enough hip hop in Boston, huh?.

Most under age 22 aren't listening to AC (and you AC stations better take notice of that because they'll be your demo in 5 years). True, HotAC is getting with it but it's tough these days to find the right niche, because the one truth in all this is that unless you're the only CHR in town, you gotta realize that the Gothic Alt/Modern Rock segment of today's youth doesn't necessarilly care for the Rap & Hip Hop segment and vice versa.

It is mighty tough these days to find the right mix of voices and music to make a CHR station a success so while I pined away at modern PD's, that's not necessarilly justified. It's a harder job in many ways because of format fragmentation than it was ten years ago when you could just play the hits.

So getting back to jocks, you guys know I'm a big classic radio nut (thus my alias), and I still think that was the very best era for listening with jocks who could talkup a record and hit the post every time, sometimes being a bit nonsensical at times. But most younger folks just can't relate and it means nothing to them as the CHR audience today is much more lifestyle & gossip oriented due to cable & video. I think it's sad, the mystique of radio is gone, but it's a sad reality for those of us who remember the 'good ole days'.

> I have to say that I agree with you in disagreeing with the
> original poster. Although I do agree with everything Steve
> said, it seems as though he hasn't really given Kiss a
> listen lately, so he's making more general statements, not
> statements that directly apply to Kiss.
>
> The jocks on Kiss today aren't heritage jocks from great top
> 40 stations of the past, necessarily. But those
> heritage/legendary jocks are no longer relatable really to
> Kiss' target demo in today's world anymore.
>
> That said, I think Deirdra and Romeo! are outstanding and
> relate quite well to the target demo. I'm not as much a fan
> of Jackson Blue, but nonetheless, he's solid and his show is
> very upbeat with plenty of audience interaction. None of
> these jocks are liner card readers.
>
> Further, the original poster made a comment about Cadillac
> and Kiss being the laughing stock of the industry. I don't
> think that could be further from the truth. Cadillac knows
> exactly what he's doing and the proof is in the pudding.
> Kiss and Jam'n stay right on top consistently in every
> single ratings book. Furthermore, Kiss stays on top
> consistently at a time when many CHRs nationwide are
> experiencing significant ratings drops.
>
> > I agree that Boston has been FILLED with great
> > jocks/communicators of the past. Who could argue against
> > that? I'm asking for examples of who we're complaining
> > about today and why, because A) we've been generalizing
> > every jock that works at a certain station and B) I just
> > don't hear it.
> > No arguing - just disagreeing - and trying to understand.
> >
> >
> > > Well, look. Lets not anyone get into an arguement here.
>
> > I
> > > think the statement made in the second post of this
> thread
> >
> > > is the answer here. This isn't 1985. I can't single
> out
> > > one example of a 'poor' jock. What I will say is that
> > since
> > > Telcom 96, the bar has been substantially lowered across
>
> > the
> > > board, in every top 50 market. There are some stations
> > with
> > > 'heritage' jocks (WODS being notable in Boston) who
> still
> > > sound like they did back in the day, but overall, the
> > state
> > > of CHR (especially) is not what it was even 10 years
> ago.
> >
> > > That I must agree with.
> > >
> > > Jocks today are representative of the diminishing pay
> > scale
> > > for those left doing a live airshift these days. How
> many
> >
> > > of these CHR stations are voice tracked after dark?
> Maybe
> >
> > > not in Boston (I don't know but I could guess), but in
> > > *most* markets, AC and CHR stations are VT'd at LEAST
> > > midnight to 5am. Many AC stations are VT'd starting at
> > 6pm.
> > > You absolutely can NOT get the same sound out of voice
> > > tracks that you can with a live jock. Some people are
> > very
> > > good at VT'ing and can get close but even with the best
> VT
> >
> > > modules available in Scott Studios, there are still
> > > limitations.
> > >
> > > And, even where the stations are mostly live, stations
> > these
> > > days don't want a 'jock'... they want someone who lives
> to
> >
> > > watch TRL, Survivor island and who wants to talk about
> the
> >
> > > latest gossip in Hollywood... They don't get that with
> > most
> > > jocks they hire so they hire someone who will work
> cheap,
> > > attend every small station event & basically live at the
>
> > > station. Working cheap being the prime concern, since
> > with
> > > corporate radio, investor relations dictate an
> > ever-dropping
> > > bottom line.
> > >
> > > Gang, it's not fair to blame the talent on the air...
> they
> >
> > > are only as good as their coach - the PD. If he doesn't
>
> > > want someone sounding better than HE/SHE does, there's
> > part
> > > of your answer. If he/she doesn't bother doing aircheck
>
> > > sessions, that's also part of the answer.
> > >
> > > When I go on the air, part of my showprep consists of
> > > listening to old 80s CHR airchecks to refresh my memory
> of
> >
> > > how it used to be... Part of it consists of at least
> > > glancing at the lastest news just in case I get asked by
> a
> >
> > > listener, or it comes up in the course of a show and I
> > don't
> > > have a DUUH moment. And yes it helps to know what
> artist
> > is
> > > up for an award or what actress is getting divorced...
> but
> >
> > > thats not the ONLY thing that matters.
> > >
> > > There's a ton of reasons for it, but you are right.
> Radio
> >
> > > ain't what it used to be, and for me, Boston is a major
> > > league disappointment. The Boston market used to be the
>
> > > best sounding radio market in the country. Now, trust
> me,
> >
> > > Memphis, the market I just left, sounds as good as
> Boston.
> >
> > > Memphis. Market #49
> > >
> > > Again, I don't think anyone in Boston is *bad*... just a
>
> > > product of the industry as a whole in 2005. And that's
> > one
> > > reason satellite radio & ipods and the like are chewing
> > such
> > > a large portion of the audience. Programmers in general
>
> > > just don't get it and management, people who come from a
>
> > > sales background instead of programming REALLY don't get
>
> > it.
> > > Some exceptions are out there, of course, but generally
>
> > > speaking the bottom line for investors is running the
> > whole
> > > damn industry. And it is sad.
> > >
> > > OH, exaples... how about examples of those who DID get
> it
> > > right back in the day... JoJo Kincaid, Mighty Mike
> > Osborne,
> > > Frank Kingston Smith... and some recent & current folks
> > > still around like J.J. Wright & Dale Dorman. Or Dave
> > > Maynard. Actually there's too many people to even
> mention
> >
> > > let alone remember. Those examples were and are
> > > communicators. How many communicators do we have in
> > Boston
> > > today?
> > >
> > > > Give some examples. I'm having a hard time following.
>
> > > When
> > > > did you listen? What did you hear? I listened
> tonight
> > > with
> > > > your comments in mind and couldn't disagree with you
> > more.
> > >
> > > > No liner card breaks. Tons of entertaining phone
> calls.
> >
> > > > Lots of energy. Get a little more specific please.
> > >
> >
> <P ID="signature">______________
</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom