deltas69 said:
here's a question for all of those that understand the tech stuff..i travel east on 40 to lebanon, then swing south through watertown, into smithville, over to 40 and cookeville..by the time i get to watertown..roughly 20 miles south/southeast off I 40..WLAC is loaded with static, hardly perceptible..shouldn't 50k get out more than that as the crow flies ?? the signal is barely distinguishable to smithville..out of smithville i can pick up 780 am out of sparta much better..think they are running just a thousand watts...i know back in the day..WLS would fry my radio at night out of chicago..why can't WLAC make it barely 30 miles out of nashville..doesn't matter what vehicle i'm in..so it's not the radio..although i know the old super hetrodyne am recievers of the 60's were much better than the am recievers today......whats the problem ?? ???
The high dial position. Stations on lower frequencies "get out" better.
Assume two stations transmitting from the same site, one on 640kHz and the other on 1470. Both run enough power and an efficient enough antenna to deliver 400 millivolts per meter of signal at 1 kilometer (1,000 yards) from the tower. (that figure is pretty much correct for WSM 650.)
If you monitor at a site 100 kilometers (60 miles) from the tower... the station on 640 will deliver a signal of 0.11 millivolts per meter. The station on 1470 will deliver 0.014 millivolts per meter - nearly 10dB less.
FWIW the 780 station is in Cookeville and indeed runs 1000 watts. They're simulcast on another 1,000-watt station in Sparta which is on 860. (so they probably identify for both frequencies & cities)
_________________________________________________
On a completely different subject, I have to concur with "SwissVol" about WNRQ-HD2. A format like that is just begging for a "deep cuts" approach - but that's not what they're delivering.