N
Nertz!
Guest
What would be needed to get Harrisburg, Scranton, Salsbury, Baltimore, and New York stations on the HDTV?
Nertz! said:What would be needed to get Harrisburg, Scranton, Salsbury, Baltimore, and New York stations on the HDTV?
BRNout said:Nertz! said:What would be needed to get Harrisburg, Scranton, Salsbury, Baltimore, and New York stations on the HDTV?
One Hell of an antenna.![]()
Scott Fybush said:I would definitely encourage you to come join us at WTFDA (www.wtfda.org), where you'll get lots of good advice.
In the DTV world, sometimes even a good outdoor antenna isn't enough anymore. Back in the analog era, there were 67 available TV channels (2-36 and 38-69) that could be used to accommodate all the TV stations serving all those closely-spaced markets around the region. When channels 52-69 were taken out of TV use, and channels 2-6 became unsuitable for DTV, that left just 43 channels into which to cram all those signals that used to fit in 67 channels.
Actually, it left 43 channels in which to cram even more signals than used to fit in 67 channels, since the FCC is still licensing new low-power TV channels and, in some areas, "digital replacement translators" to help overcome the limitations of DTV signals in sprawling markets like Harrisburg and Scranton.
You'd do well to go to rabbitears.info and take a look at who's on what RF channel in each of your nearby markets, and you can get a sense of what channels are open enough that you might have a shot at DX reception, and what channels are just completely blocked because of nearer co-channel signals. That might give you an indication of what you can and can't expect to receive.
(An easier and quicker way to get that same list is to use TVFool.com - plug in your address and the height of the antenna you plan to use and you'll get a very reliable list of what you should and shouldn't be getting.)