blackgold said:If they petitioned the FCC to make one of the "pirates" give up that frequency, then WILD could operate on a legal translator frequency. But...with Radio One in trouble, they won't even think of it.
blackgold said:Something really HAS to be done to save WILD-AM 1090. But what? Short of moving it to the Extended AM band, I don't have any more ideas.
blackgold said:Okay, scrap the idea about WILD using a pirate station for a translator. If they petitioned the FCC to make one of the "pirates" give up that frequency, then WILD could operate on a legal translator frequency.
DanStrassberg said:And moving to Ex-band is also a non-starter. The FCC is no longer accepting applications for Ex-band AND, when it was accepting such applications,
blackgold said:I give up! I guess the subject is closed. WILD-AM 1090 is about to become a thing of the past. Yep, one of these days, the final sign-off will be heard.
"AM 1090, WILD BOSTON. Closing down for good.
Radio One-Another One Bites The Dust!
Where information is power? HA!"
And finally, we'll hear the Black National Anthem, "Lift Every Voice," until the power current is turned off.
raccoonradio said:..... WEIM Fitchburg .....
DanStrassberg said:The original applicant for Rochester NH was the station that was then WWNH 930, but the way I remember the story, the first application was essentially a petition to the FCC to establish an allocation. Once the allocation had been established, multiple applicants could apply for it. Preference was given to AM stations that could show (or had already shown in their original petitions) that they would reduce interference on the 540 to 1600 hHz band by moving to Ex-band. IIRC, WWNH established that it would reduce interference in the 540 to 1600-kHz band but never filed the second application for a CP to construct the Ex-band facilities it had been allocated.
4CX1000A said:Who ended up with 1700?
raccoonradio said:oops, yes true re: old habits...when I think of 1460 it's "WBET" when it's really "WXBR" for example