• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

I too am a fan of Leykis

Re: Robo-Hairclub

> > > > > > And am so glad to see this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.bringbacktomleykis.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > Lisa..oops...I mean Dougee? A fan of something
> > > corporatly
> > > > > owned operated and controlled?!?!? hell hath frozen
> > > over.
> > >
> > >
> > > We'll just start calling you (robo) Sgt. Hairclub. It's
> > > pretty obvious by the way you freak out any time anyone
> > > mentions Lisa's name. And this guy wasn't even talking
> > about
> > > her this time, but you were sure to bring it back
> around.
> >
> > Robojock on this board and Wooddespiser on Lisa Wood's
> Truth
> > About Radio Blog are the SAME person. With a disturbing
> > obsessive fixation with Lisa that my wife (who studies
> > psychology) says seems to come from an unbalanced and
> > inexperienced young (hopefully) man in the radio industry
> > who likely was turned down by Lisa in the past who never
> > learned to overcome his emotions and move on and seems
> > jealous of Lisa's popularity in spite of his denials of
> the
> > painfully obvious....
> >
> > You can't always get what you want Robojock. But if you
> try
> > sometimes, you get what you need....
> > >
> I'm sorry to dissapoint you Larry...but I haven't visited
> Ms. Wood's silly little blog for over 6 months.
> If you'd like to view my browers logs, etc..you're more than
> welcome to make the 1100 mile trek to my place and do so.

Why do that when we got the internet right here in front of us?

Here y'all, read this:

http://www.lisawood.blogspot.com/

Read Robojock's bitchings and negativity about Lisa here-including this thread and Wooddespiser's responses on Lisa Wood's blog and compare. Note the language and writing style, it's a dead giveaway.

We're not as dumb as you presume we are Robojock....


> >
>
<P ID="signature">______________
"If I were in this business only for the business, I wouldn't be in this business." Samuel Goldwyn

[email protected]


</P><P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by TheOriginalLarry on 12/02/05 07:17 AM.</FONT></P>
 
> I love when people post this stuff over and over and over
> like they've just dredged up some unknown raunchy state
> secret! Tom has openly talked himself on air about all this
> stuff ad nauseam...
>
True, and I probably shoulda held back but I couldn't resist :)

"Talent On Loan From Oxy Contin!!""<P ID="signature">______________
raccoonradio5ap.gif
</P>
 
Jesus who gives two flying f##@s who anyone is on this board, can we please just stay on topic???

Where the hell is the moderators around here?
 
Re: Robo-Hairclub

> > > > > > > And am so glad to see this:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.bringbacktomleykis.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Lisa..oops...I mean Dougee? A fan of something
> > > > corporatly
> > > > > > owned operated and controlled?!?!? hell hath
> frozen
> > > > over.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We'll just start calling you (robo) Sgt. Hairclub.
> It's
> > > > pretty obvious by the way you freak out any time
> anyone
> > > > mentions Lisa's name. And this guy wasn't even talking
>
> > > about
> > > > her this time, but you were sure to bring it back
> > around.

Apparently you are as dumb as I presume if you think I'm the only person in this world who wishes lisa would shut her trap. Sorry larry, you've smoked too much this time.
> > >
> > > Robojock on this board and Wooddespiser on Lisa Wood's
> > Truth
> > > About Radio Blog are the SAME person. With a disturbing
> > > obsessive fixation with Lisa that my wife (who studies
> > > psychology) says seems to come from an unbalanced and
> > > inexperienced young (hopefully) man in the radio
> industry
> > > who likely was turned down by Lisa in the past who never
>
> > > learned to overcome his emotions and move on and seems
> > > jealous of Lisa's popularity in spite of his denials of
> > the
> > > painfully obvious....
> > >
> > > You can't always get what you want Robojock. But if you
> > try
> > > sometimes, you get what you need....
> > > >
> > I'm sorry to dissapoint you Larry...but I haven't visited
> > Ms. Wood's silly little blog for over 6 months.
> > If you'd like to view my browers logs, etc..you're more
> than
> > welcome to make the 1100 mile trek to my place and do so.
>
> Why do that when we got the internet right here in front of
> us?
>
> Here y'all, read this:
>
> http://www.lisawood.blogspot.com/
>
> Read Robojock's bitchings and negativity about Lisa
> here-including this thread and Wooddespiser's responses on
> Lisa Wood's blog and compare. Note the language and writing
> style, it's a dead giveaway.
>
> We're not as dumb as you presume we are Robojock....
>
>
> > >
> >
>
 
Re: Robo-Hairclub

> Robojock on this board and Wooddespiser on Lisa Wood's Truth
> About Radio Blog are the SAME person. With a disturbing
> obsessive fixation with Lisa that my wife (who studies
> psychology) says seems to come from an unbalanced and
> inexperienced young (hopefully) man in the radio industry
> who likely was turned down by Lisa in the past who never
> learned to overcome his emotions and move on and seems
> jealous of Lisa's popularity in spite of his denials of the
> painfully obvious....

What does your wife say about someone who feels he has to chime in on every single topic on a radio discussion board, even if he has nothing to contribute, just something about himself in nearly every reply? And someone who is egocentric enough to feel the need to add an adjective to his screen name?
 
> > I think its funny that being skilled in radio makes being
> a
> > wife-beating bully okay.
> >
> > I think its too bad he got screwed by entercom, but I"m
> glad
> > he's lost a major market. Talented radio personality or
> > not, he's gotta go.
>
> Good to have an opinion heavy on facts.
>

... Its a damn forum. You read many facts in ANY of these posts?

Believe it or not, people have opinions... and sometimes they're different than yours!
 
> > I think its funny that being skilled in radio makes being
> a
> > wife-beating bully okay.
>
> I for one never would condone such an act, what I am saying
> is, let's consider the fact it happened TWELVE years ago, it
> WAS settled with her, they then remained married for several
> more years, happily for the bulk of that time by most
> accounts, and the person we are discussing TODAY is a free
> man who has paid for that past act, legally, financially and
> openly states he regrets it having ever happened. So my
> point is, there's very little ammunition to be had for folks
> trying to make some giant stink of it today...
>
> > I think its too bad he got screwed by entercom, but I"m
> glad
> > he's lost a major market. Talented radio personality or
> > not, he's gotta go.
>
> He's not gone, the angry mob threatening to burn down the
> station saw to that apparently. As for being on tape delay
> nights, I am pretty confident that is just a temporary
> situation until he finds his way back to live air. Like him
> or hate him, he is damn good at the particular kind of show
> he has chosen to do, and has a HUUUUGE following in Seattle.
> I can't see how he could not be back on live in relatively
> short order. I guess we'll see...
>

Well 12-years ago or not, it doesn't explain the other 2 (or is it 3 now?) divorces... and we're not talking no-fault divorces either.

I do hear what you're saying, but that was kinda my point: You can have any background in the world, and as long as you're not actively in jail, it'll be forgiven if its Popular Radio. Its the one thing thats always made me uncomfortable (from the outside, I admit) about the radio biz.

I'll spare you my version of the 'why Tom Leykis is bad' rant. I'm sure you've heard it all before.

I just think its funny that a record of failed (if not abusive) relationships with women is a qualification to have a show on the radio that largely deals with how to deal with women. It means something about the business... I just wish I knew what.
 
> Well 12-years ago or not, it doesn't explain the other 2 (or
> is it 3 now?) divorces... and we're not talking no-fault
> divorces either.

Whose fault a divorce is usually depends on which half you ask...

> I do hear what you're saying, but that was kinda my point:
> You can have any background in the world, and as long as
> you're not actively in jail, it'll be forgiven if its
> Popular Radio. Its the one thing thats always made me
> uncomfortable (from the outside, I admit) about the radio
> biz.

Right or wrong that applies to ALL forms of media/celebrity.

> I'll spare you my version of the 'why Tom Leykis is bad'
> rant. I'm sure you've heard it all before.

Actually yes because you and I had a similar but extended discussion on this back when Robin Erickson filed the lawsuit against Entercom. I still recall your positions on the issues and I respect your opinions, mine are just different (which as you mentioned upstream can be expected on an internet forum) :)

> I just think its funny that a record of failed (if not
> abusive) relationships with women is a qualification to have
> a show on the radio that largely deals with how to deal with
> women.

Well that's not entirely accurate, and a common misconception about his show. His show is *NOT* at all about "relationships". It is about "getting L--D", which does not necessitate a successful relationship track record by any means...
 
I agree... That applies to everyone. You see it constantly in film, and TV, and radio. I'm just way to dewy-eyed for this world I think... I expect people who receive adulation to deserve it. And we all know it doesn't actually work that way.




PS: In the fault thing I meant; Its my understanding that the divorces weren't 'no fault' in the legal sense. That usually negates pre-nups. It also implies that somebody did something *bad*. Now we don't know who necessarily did, but its interesting.
 
> ... Its a damn forum. You read many facts in ANY of these
> posts?
>
> Believe it or not, people have opinions... and sometimes
> they're different than yours!

I didn't but I do now.
 
> I just think its funny that a record of failed (if not
> abusive) relationships with women is a qualification to have
> a show on the radio that largely deals with how to deal with
> women. It means something about the business... I just
> wish I knew what.

It means The Rule of Most Listeners: he who attracts the most listeners wins. This business is full of slobs, reprobates, whackos, and persons of ill repute. As are most creative fields.
 
> PS: In the fault thing I meant; Its my understanding that
> the divorces weren't 'no fault' in the legal sense. That
> usually negates pre-nups. It also implies that somebody did
> something *bad*. Now we don't know who necessarily did, but
> its interesting.

Perhaps so, but it doesn't mean somebody chased the other around with a fire poker. Somebody was sleeping with the intern, who knows.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom