Another comment I want to make; how do you know that 93.7 would be an impossible frequency for a top rated radio station? Its not full market, but if it had was programmed correctly with something exciting that isn't already being done in Seattle, I could see how it could be a major hit.
If it had a unique quality that caught on, it'd be worth more in price.
Right now in Boston, MA a new country station on a weak rimshot frequency is attemping to give the main country music station a proverbial "run for their money" (rimshot from Boston metro into the suburbs).
Bottom line, I don't think "rimshot" should automatically be considered out of the realm of possibility for a major listener-base.
As I said, I think the price BossBill got for the station is excellent, bordering on incredible. Of course, he took back paper but its a heck of a deal. Building a competitive format with a sales force and generating cash flow in a Top 20 market would cost millions, with a big chance of failure. The ROI on that is just not there as far as I can see.
Ford, that first question is a pretty good one and something I've been wondering myself lately. About how long does it typically take for a new sign-on such as 93.7 locally, 102.7 in Boise, or 107.7 in Bend to attract a somewhat stable audience? In other words, how long before the fact that a station is not as well established as a competitor with the same signal is not at a disadvantage because it's just signed on?
1. In your opinion, do you think the "Bigfoot Country" brand would have pushed up the value of the 93.7 sale? I am just having a hard time believing that it was a better business decision to make a flip to programming that has yet to gather any following, and THEN sell. After all, it can take months to get the word out.
It's not about audience when sales prices are calculated. It is about BCF. To generate decent BCF can take a year or more with a successful, sustainable format.
Visit Grays Harbor, where radio is free of most of the Seattle signals!
Forget "Unforgettable" .... the "you don't have to listen to Seattle radio" could be a KILLER tourism campaign for GH County!
they would wreak havoc with other stations, namely KINK.
So is KSWW and KJET going HD really soon? Sure glad they weren't in the Seattle area - they would wreak havoc with other stations, namely KINK. I don't think the IBOC would be much of a factor in Centralia and south.
-crainbebo
KSWW yes, KJET not yet.
Boosters work really well when there is a huge mountain in the way and almost zero signal within the predicted contour in a certain area. They work less well when that's not the case. The problem we have is that we have signal, but it is marginal in some areas due to "Cosi Hill". As with all boosters to some extent, we have areas where the main transmitter is fighting with the booster. That's why we have a translator on 93.1 in East Grays Harbor County.
Yes, it is possible to have a booster with HD, but more complex, and I don't intend to put HD on KJET unless I ever can justify a move to a different site and eliminate the booster. I don't know whether anyone has had success yet with a digital booster. I would expect the San Francisco area to be a good test case.
All of the above. If the phase relationship were perfect, then they would sound okay. But that's only possible at a point in space. Move a foot and it changes. Because of that, it is more dependent on the relative signal levels. If the two signals are about the same level, it can be awful. If one signal is a lot stronger than the other, it's not so bad. In areas where the main is never totally absent, the trick is to figure out in which areas the mutual interference doesn't matter, like uninhabited areas. By phasing, you can cause the worst interference zones to change.
We do promote the translator. Top of hour ID "93-1 and 105-7 The Jet, K J E T, Raymond-Aberdeen".