• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Kari Lake previews her plans for Voice of America in the next Administration.

I, remember fondly being interviewed on the Voice Of America in Washington, D.C. It turned out that Kim A Elliot and I were cousins. He was on the VOA's board of governors. I find it hard to believe that the Voice Of America could be shut down
 
RHC on 6000 2-3 nights ago sounded like absolute garbage.. i mean, liek bad, even for Cuba...... they werent on the next night that i could tell

the RHC transmitter on 6000 kHz has been on several nights with a strong signal near Chicago around 0000-0200 UTC with no or very low modulation. also in the mornings 1500-1700 UTC on 15230 kHz with a good signal also with no or little modulation. can barely hear anything on my radios with the volume turned all the way up.

doesn't the RHC "engineers" listen on a radio to hear what their signal sounds like? pretty stupid to have a 100,000 or 250,000 watt transmitter running if can't be modulated sufficiently!

might as well turn the transmitter off and save the electricity. RHC should call their Chinese buddies to fix their modulation problems, however, the Chinese company likely won't fix it for free... "no dinero, no fix!" things really fell apart after Arnie Coro passed (one of the founders of RHC)

on the other hand, Radio Rebelde sounds good on 5025 kHz in the evenings 0100-0300 UTC, modulation strength nearly as good as Radio Exterior España on 9690 kHz
 
the RHC transmitter on 6000 kHz has been on several nights with a strong signal near Chicago around 0000-0200 UTC with no or very low modulation. also in the mornings 1500-1700 UTC on 15230 kHz with a good signal also with no or little modulation. can barely hear anything on my radios with the volume turned all the way up.

doesn't the RHC "engineers" listen on a radio to hear what their signal sounds like? pretty stupid to have a 100,000 or 250,000 watt transmitter running if can't be modulated sufficiently!

might as well turn the transmitter off and save the electricity. RHC should call their Chinese buddies to fix their modulation problems, however, the Chinese company likely won't fix it for free... "no dinero, no fix!" things really fell apart after Arnie Coro passed (one of the founders of RHC)

on the other hand, Radio Rebelde sounds good on 5025 kHz in the evenings 0100-0300 UTC, modulation strength nearly as good as Radio Exterior España on 9690 kHz

RHC and their related stations have sounded this bad for years even before Coro died
 
doesn't the RHC "engineers" listen on a radio to hear what their signal sounds like? pretty stupid to have a 100,000 or 250,000 watt transmitter running if can't be modulated sufficiently!
WRTH has, for several years, listed only two transmitters, one 50 kw and the other 100 kw. With the ongoing power shortages and blackouts across Cuba, I doubt that either is running full power. Somewhere in the very hierarchical socialist system it is likely that nobody has thought about just turning them off.
 
60 Minutes devoted more than 13 of those minutes tonight to a very comprehensive piece on VOA.

I think it's well worth the watch.

 
60 Minutes devoted more than 13 of those minutes tonight to a very comprehensive piece on VOA.

I think it's well worth the watch.

We are, again, getting that mystical and unsubstantiated number of 360 million listeners.

As mentioned, I had the opportunity to review raw radio survey data in about a dozen Latin American nations over the decades... going back to when Shortwave was actually viable... and I never saw one mention of VOA.

And, yes, some VOA shows were run on local stations. In Quito, Ecuador, the few that ran were on stations with so little audience they did not get a share of 0.01 in the local ratings. So, again, nobody was listening.

If that number can be proven, we need to see more data on how some kind of statistical sample was projected into a universe that is, essentially, the whole world. Otherwise, this estimate is a chimera.
 
If that number can be proven, we need to see more data on how some kind of statistical sample was projected into a universe that is, essentially, the whole world. Otherwise, this estimate is a chimera.

Keep in mind that Project 2025 didn't question the audience figures, and also supported retaining shortwave systems:

Non-web-based technologies that are proven and durable, such as shortwave radio transmission stations, have been grossly deemphasized in budgeting in favor of newer webbased technologies. This move is dangerously short-sighted and puts the U.S. at a perilous strategic disadvantage in the event of a major conflict, particularly with Russia or China.
The USAGM’s responsibility for the only U.S. global shortwave radio capability is of critical strategic importance if America is to carry its message to people seeking information and freedom within conflict zones. Shortwave technologies also make it possible to carry broadcasts in areas where Internet traffic is severely restricted, as it is in many authoritarian states today.

At no point in the EO or in the two press releases that followed was there any doubt or concern about audience figures. The lack of effectiveness was not the reason for the shutdown. The primary reason given by the white house and by Kari Lake was the content of the reporting, which was described as radical far left.

The view presented in both Project 2025 and in the release by Kari Lake is that the firewall protecting journalism needs to be removed, and the VOA needs to be under the direct supervision of the white house. If they bring it back in some way, that would be the main change they'd want to see implemented.

Personally I think their argument would be more effective and less ideological if at any time they brought up questions about it's effectiveness in reaching the targeted audience. But it appears that nobody in the food chain has that kind of experience.
 
It's worth noting, for those who actually watched the story, that it didn't really focus on traditional radio, and there was no mention at all of shortwave. The clips they showed were mostly of VOA video content.
And the video is even harder to deliver in repressive or "enemy" states.
 
It's worth noting, for those who actually watched the story, that it didn't really focus on traditional radio, and there was no mention at all of shortwave. The clips they showed were mostly of VOA video content.
Which is more proof of Marshall McLuhan's theory that "The Medium is the message," per my freshman Communications Arts course in undergraduate college. Personally, I think the fact that the VOA was there for those who were looking for it and is not there now is more important than the fact that it didn't have a measureable audience in the commercial sense. I also think that the President's threats to NPR and PBS come from the same place that destroyed VOA; namely that he doesn't want to have any media present, especially media funded by Congress, that will give his critics a platform on which they can press their grievances against him. What the current U.S. President wants for the media that cover him is what we see in Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, and not what is in currently democratic countries such as Great Britain, France, Germany, Australia, and New Zealand.
 



Here is a petition coming out calling on Congress to fund the parent organization of VOA to protect journalists in certain parts of the world.

 
Here is a petition coming out calling on Congress to fund the parent organization of VOA to protect journalists in certain parts of the world.
I don't think that any of the groups or people involved have the needed awareness of the total death of shortwave, the low impact of high power "adjacent nation" AMs and the controls in totalitarian nations of internet content. They are essentially worshiping a dead horse rather than burying it.
 
I don't think that any of the groups or people involved have the needed awareness of the total death of shortwave, the low impact of high power "adjacent nation" AMs and the controls in totalitarian nations of internet content. They are essentially worshiping a dead horse rather than burying it.

The same could be said about the government's reason for shutting it down. The people involved never address the transmission system. Their objection, and the only reason for the shutdown, is because the content.

They don't seem to realize that their argument would be seen as less political and partisan if they focused on the technology instead of the content. But they can get past the content part.
 
They don't seem to realize that their argument would be seen as less political and partisan if they focused on the technology instead of the content. But they can get past the content part.
As I said before, the people selected to head the VOA, FCC and to direct funding for things like NPR and PBS are among the worst nominations of the current government.
 
I don't think that any of the groups or people involved have the needed awareness of the total death of shortwave, the low impact of high power "adjacent nation" AMs and the controls in totalitarian nations of internet content. They are essentially worshiping a dead horse rather than burying it.
This weekend, I'm going to what is being called "Gadgets and Gallons." It's a party for afew blind people who are going to share some high- and low-tech gadgets that either we use currently or did use at one time (along with some ice cream, the "gallons" in the title). I'm bringing a Cranmer abacus, based on the Japanese abacus. While calculators and computers can outwit its speed, when the electricity goes out or is turned off, the abacus, which requires no electricity--just brain power and a few simple rules--can assist me with any calculations I need to make just like a pencil and paper can assist sighted people in the same situation.

I bring this non-radio point up to illustrate the need for shortwave. It may be a "dead horse" now but if your computer crashes and the leader of the free world decides that he wishes to be the leader of the dictators instead, having such a resource, despite the weaknesses the shortwave bands have, could give you a leg up in knowing what is happening out there in the world that your "perfect leader" doesn't want you to know. We *really* do need to rethink some of this stuff about going *only* to where the audience is currently.
 


Back
Top Bottom