• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Kari Lake previews her plans for Voice of America in the next Administration.

Kari Lake will do what the yet-to-be-appointed head of the USGMA tells her to do. That's what the director did under Michael Pack. And the yet-to-be-appointed head of the USGMA will carry out the goals of the white house. It's really to soon to evaluate what the VOA will do.

Lake also acknowledged that Trump can't unilaterally appoint her to this position -- that decision lies with a bipartisan board that would have to remove the current director and approve a new one.

From my perspective, it seems a bit presumptuous for CBS News to do such an interview. She's not officially in the role, and she hasn't officially been appointed. It would be like interviewing the operator of the Panama Canal about the changes he would foresee under US control. What was the thinking at CBS News?

I'd like to know how the VOA will handle stories involving the newly elected Senator from Arizona. That's just me.
 
Last edited:
It's as much about what news they cover as what news they don't. I'm feel certain Trump's legal machinations will get less coverage on VOA than on the main stream media.
 
It's as much about what news they cover as what news they don't. I'm feel certain Trump's legal machinations will get less coverage on VOA than on the main stream media.
You do know that VOA generally does not cover domestic political news at all?

Have you ever listened to any VOA news broadcasts, either recently or in years and decades past?
 
I have and youre right.
In very general terms, news on the VOA is not about internal politics of the U.S. They focus on the "world scene" (everything from wars and conflicts to international treaties and commerce) and things like education, trade, science.

The logic behind that is that very few people in, let's say Gambia, care about individual politicians or political campaigns in any country other than their own. The same philosophy applied historically to all the shortwave national voices, from Radio Moscow to the Beeb.

But a lot of people who have never listened to the VOA think it is "just like NPR, but on shortwave".
 
In very general terms, news on the VOA is not about internal politics of the U.S. They focus on the "world scene" (everything from wars and conflicts to international treaties and commerce) and things like education, trade, science.

Unfortunately, that's not how former head of USGMA Michael Pack saw it:


Consider what might happen if Steve Bannon is named CEO of USGMA,
 
From my perspective, it seems a bit presumptuous for CBS News to do such an interview. She's not officially in the role, and she hasn't officially been appointed
Isn’t it Kari Lake who agreeing to the interview who’s being presumptuous? There is always an outside chance she won’t be appointed. I wouldn’t blame CBS News for asking any potential nominee to do an interview but I wouldn’t expect anyone to agree to an interview until they are office (or during confirmation hearings if it’s thought the interview will help them get confirmed).
 
"international treaties and commerce" Will VOA be used to set the narrative on how the USA views some treaties or justify the purchase of another country?
 
Consider what might happen if Steve Bannon is named CEO of USGMA,
Then the various USAGM services would lose whatever audience they still have. Bannon might be able to peddle his disinformation and BS to the MAGA crowd in the U.S., but an international audience will have no tolerance for any of that.

Look at the garbage being spewed by private shortwave broadcasters in the U.S. Outside of a tiny number of die-hard SW enthusiasts, religious fanatics and conspiracy nuts, nobody is listening.
 
Then the various USAGM services would lose whatever audience they still have.

I just threw that name out there. He could also nominate Tucker Carlson. Either way, it's a position that requires senate confirmation. It took them two years to confirm Michael Pack, and he was a disaster. It could take a while to get someone confirmed. Until then, Kari Lake is just waiting.

Isn’t it Kari Lake who agreeing to the interview who’s being presumptuous?

My question is why even ask her?
 
In very general terms, news on the VOA is not about internal politics of the U.S. They focus on the "world scene" (everything from wars and conflicts to international treaties and commerce) and things like education, trade, science.

The logic behind that is that very few people in, let's say Gambia, care about individual politicians or political campaigns in any country other than their own. The same philosophy applied historically to all the shortwave national voices, from Radio Moscow to the Beeb.

But a lot of people who have never listened to the VOA think it is "just like NPR, but on shortwave".
VOA does have one opinion piece that often runs during their programs, 'the opinion of the government of the United States' or something similar -- and it's clearly identified as such -- and every time I've heard it, it's about some international issue or event, not domestic US politics.
 
"international treaties and commerce" Will VOA be used to set the narrative on how the USA views some treaties or justify the purchase of another country?
It has an opinion piece that reflects the position of the Government of the United States, usually those opinions deal with international issues. When Trump was in power last time around, I don't recall the opinion pieces being particularly MAGA.
 
The whole purpose of the VOA is to try and influence foreign populations to embrace attitudes that are friendly towards the policies of the US Government. That's pretty much the purpose every country's officially sanctioned international broadcasting. IMO the returns on this have been diminishing for decades for a whole slew of reasons, and at this point the whole exercise is largely a waste of money. Those who compare VOA to NPR (which is for domestic consumption and ostensibly objective) are really saying something pretty harsh about the content on NPR.
 
Then the various USAGM services would lose whatever audience they still have. Bannon might be able to peddle his disinformation and BS to the MAGA crowd in the U.S., but an international audience will have no tolerance for any of that.

Look at the garbage being spewed by private shortwave broadcasters in the U.S. Outside of a tiny number of die-hard SW enthusiasts, religious fanatics and conspiracy nuts, nobody is listening.
Don't we have a growing right wing all over the world? Even in Germany?

Maybe they'll play "Panama" by Van Halen for 24 hours straight.
 


Back
Top Bottom