Lake also acknowledged that Trump can't unilaterally appoint her to this position -- that decision lies with a bipartisan board that would have to remove the current director and approve a new one.
You do know that VOA generally does not cover domestic political news at all?It's as much about what news they cover as what news they don't. I'm feel certain Trump's legal machinations will get less coverage on VOA than on the main stream media.
You do know that VOA generally does not cover domestic political news at all?
Have you ever listened to any VOA news broadcasts, either recently or in years and decades past?
I have and youre right.
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
In very general terms, news on the VOA is not about internal politics of the U.S. They focus on the "world scene" (everything from wars and conflicts to international treaties and commerce) and things like education, trade, science.I have and youre right.
In very general terms, news on the VOA is not about internal politics of the U.S. They focus on the "world scene" (everything from wars and conflicts to international treaties and commerce) and things like education, trade, science.
Isn’t it Kari Lake who agreeing to the interview who’s being presumptuous? There is always an outside chance she won’t be appointed. I wouldn’t blame CBS News for asking any potential nominee to do an interview but I wouldn’t expect anyone to agree to an interview until they are office (or during confirmation hearings if it’s thought the interview will help them get confirmed).From my perspective, it seems a bit presumptuous for CBS News to do such an interview. She's not officially in the role, and she hasn't officially been appointed
Then the various USAGM services would lose whatever audience they still have. Bannon might be able to peddle his disinformation and BS to the MAGA crowd in the U.S., but an international audience will have no tolerance for any of that.Consider what might happen if Steve Bannon is named CEO of USGMA,
Then the various USAGM services would lose whatever audience they still have.
Isn’t it Kari Lake who agreeing to the interview who’s being presumptuous?
CBS knows most of their audience doesn’t know she isn’t going to automatically be in charge of it, and they want the ratings that go along with people watching her interview.My question is why even ask her?
VOA does have one opinion piece that often runs during their programs, 'the opinion of the government of the United States' or something similar -- and it's clearly identified as such -- and every time I've heard it, it's about some international issue or event, not domestic US politics.In very general terms, news on the VOA is not about internal politics of the U.S. They focus on the "world scene" (everything from wars and conflicts to international treaties and commerce) and things like education, trade, science.
The logic behind that is that very few people in, let's say Gambia, care about individual politicians or political campaigns in any country other than their own. The same philosophy applied historically to all the shortwave national voices, from Radio Moscow to the Beeb.
But a lot of people who have never listened to the VOA think it is "just like NPR, but on shortwave".
It has an opinion piece that reflects the position of the Government of the United States, usually those opinions deal with international issues. When Trump was in power last time around, I don't recall the opinion pieces being particularly MAGA."international treaties and commerce" Will VOA be used to set the narrative on how the USA views some treaties or justify the purchase of another country?
The whole purpose of the VOA is to try and influence foreign populations to embrace attitudes that are friendly towards the policies of the US Government.
www.insidevoa.com
Don't we have a growing right wing all over the world? Even in Germany?Then the various USAGM services would lose whatever audience they still have. Bannon might be able to peddle his disinformation and BS to the MAGA crowd in the U.S., but an international audience will have no tolerance for any of that.
Look at the garbage being spewed by private shortwave broadcasters in the U.S. Outside of a tiny number of die-hard SW enthusiasts, religious fanatics and conspiracy nuts, nobody is listening.