scooty430 said:
Zeb Norris said:
No PPM results from KFOG yet. It's an experiment.
KCBS-FM isn't a Classic Rock. They probably used something very close to their regular library, but that's all hits.
Classic Hits is all hits. Classic Rock and AAA include album tracks. Playing all hits is safer than playing album tracks. But more hits isn't the same thing as deeper.
Even deeper than normal album tracks go into A to Zs for Classic Rock and AAA. Results for KLOS? From a 2.8 to a 2.3. That's not something you can dispute.
Putting in depth for Classic Rock and AAAs requires great production. That's how come 10 at 10 works for KFOG. The music alone would bomb. The production sells it. That's also what makes The Drive in Chicago work.
There's a way to argue for depth. But 2.8 to 2.3 tells us that just doing an A to Z isn't the way to make depth work.
Not talking about KCBS. That is JACK, and they never deter from format, ever. They have never done an A to Z.
I'm talking about CBS-FM, in New York, a.k.a. WCBS. They have done three A to Zs, two of which had over 2000 songs in them, all of which had very rarely played "stiffs" in them.
So now that you know that, let me say it again:
CBS-FM (in New York) has done three A to Zs.
One in July
One in November
One in December.
It's the #1 market in the country. Now don't you think if it tanked once, it would have been gone forever?
Instead, it was replicated all over the place. Even on K-EARTH, one of the most conservative stations around.
Must be a reason. Now what could it be...... (waiting for David Eduardo's illogical response....)
Dude, if you're not careful your head's gonna explode.
We got onto A to Zs in this thread because I asked about the timing of KLOS's A to Z. It was in this ratings period. It did crappy. That's what I wanted to find out.
That doesn't mean KFOG's will do crappy. I've said as much. I'm interested in those results too.
I'm not very interested in WCBS's A to Z, nor K-Earth's, because I work in a format that doesn't have much in common with the Oldies (or Classic Hits) format, as I outlined above. However, I'm not about to take your word that WCBS played lots of non-hit deep tracks. In point of fact, I don't know what songs WCBS DID include, how their jocks delivered their A to Z, what the production was like, or what the ratings results were like. But the idea that something was "replicated" is pretty shaky. Was LA's Jack "replicated" in NYC? Because the results sure weren't replicated. Was "The Drive" in Chicago "replicated" by The Drive in San Francisco? In this case I've heard them both; it wasn't replicated. That's why The Drive in San Francisco is long gone.
Now Scooty, correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to argue on the boards that more songs in rotation is a good idea in all cases for all stations. You haven't acknowledged that that KLOS's A to Z did crappy. But it did. Crappy. Any PD with a brain in her/his head would think twice before "replicating" that.
Perhaps A to Zs can be done right in some formats by some programming teams, but (as I've said) I think it's a lazy and un-interesting concept. Just my opinion. On the other hand (as I've said) programming that includes deeper and/or more songs combined with brilliant production can work. KINK in Portland just did 40 days of special programming to celebrate their 40th anniversary. Each day they only played music from one year from their history. I personally think that's a more interesting concept, and it also says something about KINK in particular that the alphabet can't. This special programming didn't hurt them in their ratings.
So Scooty, in conclusion, depth can work if it's done right. But it isn't a one-size fits all solution. I'm in AAA in part because I like depth. So I'm sympathetic to your desire for depth. But it's an indisputable fact that KLOS's A to Z did not work.
That's it for me on the topic; you and DE can carry on till the end of time on this one, but I'm...
out.