ure, and you are almost certainly correct. But I refer you back up to the discussion of it being Saul's station and his money. It is only a failure if he deems it so, and from all that I have read over the years, he doesn't mind the failures. He is a broadcaster committed to quality programming (by his own definition) and experimentation. Like all of the stations he has put on 1260, this one is not destined to last for all of the reasons you correctly note. But what you don't understand is not all success is measured in dollars. I am quite sure he is proud of even his "failures" and the fact that they were ever on the air at all is a success in and of itself. Remember: his stations, his rules, his definitions. Not yours, the market's, or anyone else's. I, like a lot of other people, plan to enjoy it for the 18 to 24 months it is here.
Yes, it is Saul's station, and he can't find anything better to do with it. If 1260 were mine, I would turn in the license and accept the lack of viability of a suburban AM on a high dial position in today's radio world.
Saul can do whatever he wants with the station and the HD subchannels. In that you are right. But putting the format on a pedestal and worshiping it is senseless, just as is blaming consultants for showing viable stations how to maximize their audience and revenues.
I actually relate to Saul's little project. When I put my first FM on the air, I managed to get a large batch of FM licenses. Several I used for simulcasts with my AMs, another I used for Beautiful Music and then there was one I had no profit-making use for so I ran it with no commercials as a classical station. I enjoyed making out each day's playlist (it only ran from 5 PM to 11 PM) and liked listening to it when at home in the evenings. I sustained it that way for several years until I needed the frequency to do album rock. It was fun, but I knew it could not make money... but the cluster had a bunch of other profitable stations to sustain it.
Last edited: