• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Looks like Aleluya's "Mighty Mite" Translator is on the Air

If it's in simulcast with 1460 it should be "KBRZ Freeport, K236AR Angleton".

Nope. KBRZ has been licensed to Missouri City since 2008. The license to cover for moving the translator to Missouri City was filed 10 days ago.

Translators only need to ID 3 times a day unless they ID via morse code.

They also shuffled ownership on the translator last month from Aleluya to DAIJ Media, which seems to be the holding company for their non-religious assets, including KBRZ.
 
You're right, the brain went on hiatus about KBRZ moving to Mo. City. Did not know they had applied to move the translator though. It's just a COL change? Is there a purpose behind that, John? Does the new translator not cover Angleton?
 
Does the new translator not cover Angleton?

It can still be heard there but it doesn't have to "cover" Angleton. In fact, "COL" means virtually nothing when it comes to translators because they may be licensed to cover an area that might include one or several communities, or a place that doesn't meet the criteria as being "licensable" as with regular stations. Moving a translator is really rather easy, since one of the main things that they have to document is that the new coverage area has some overlap (however minimal) with the previous one. In this case they could have even kept Angleton on the license as the area that they serve, but relocating to Missouri City and being adjacent to Houston not only results in a huge increase in population within the coverage area, it also looks better (on paper) to be licensed there.

And in other news...

Keep an eye out for translators that may eventually sign on from Fairbanks and Hitchcock. Applications from a filing window ten years ago, after being weeded out, have been accepted this month and will likely get approval. That's providing they don't get preempted by LPFM applications filed in the upcoming window in October. In a controversial decision, the FCC informed translator applicants who are awarded a construction permit might be "building at their own risk." I know it sounds outlandish, but that would be a case of LPFM's trumping translators.
 
Gooooooood Mooooorning Istanbul! Knew it was gonna happen, but the oldies sure sounded good while they lasted. It baffles me that no one even thinks they can't make money with that music. They aren't "OLD". They're timeless..............sorta like a '63 split window Vette. You know the words to damned near every song and every song has a good memory attached to it. Just a pity. Good to hear that they're putting some high school sports on the thing, though.
 
You're right, the brain went on hiatus about KBRZ moving to Mo. City. Did not know they had applied to move the translator though. It's just a COL change? Is there a purpose behind that, John? Does the new translator not cover Angleton?

From the FCC: An FM translator may rebroadcast an AM station only if the translator is within the SMALLER of (1) a 25 mile (40 km) radius circle from the AM station's transmitter site AND (2) the AM station's 2.0 mV/m contour.

So they have to move to Missouri City to provide fill-in coverage within Missouri City. The fact that a good chunk of Houston happens to also be able to listen in with the new pattern is a nice bonus. But out in Angleton, they wouldn't be able to rebroadcast KBRZ because the Angleton pattern doesn't qualify as fill-in for 1460. Besides getting better coverage of the metro with the move, the other significant difference is as a fill-in translator the very thing that got them a visit from the FCC in Angleton (feeding the signal over the internet) is perfectly legal now that they're in Missouri City rebroadcasting KBRZ. It's all explained by the FCC's FAQ that I linked.

But somebody needs to buy the sports guys a professional sound card, because their Soundblaster has such awful hum that the high school game was nearly inaudible on AM and FM. Talk about blowing your first impression.
 
There main format seems to be middle eastern pop this will fail not enough listeners here in Houston to even give it a attempt. Another thing I have noticed is a lot of the tracks they are playing sound really muffled they oldies sounded just fine and that format would have work nicely
 
I do hope you realize the station is brokered. That means you or I can come in and buy time on the station if it is available. Want oldies, buy the time, plain and simple. If you want to play Whale Songs and dolphin chatter, you can do it if you have the money. Think of it as public access radio where you pay for the share of the airtime you use.

We had some weekly programs on our station that had very small audiences but did very well. We had a Polish Language show for immigrants from Poland. We had a Bangladeshi show for a long time and several others. I'm guessing the smaller the community the better the chances those businesses will pay to have commercials aired on the only program of its type in Houston.
 
That means you or I can come in and buy time on the station if it is available. Want oldies, buy the time, plain and simple. If you want to play Whale Songs and dolphin chatter, you can do it if you have the money. Think of it as public access radio where you pay for the share of the airtime you use.

If I had the money, I would program continuous farts - to make a point about brokered radio. It does not serve the public interest, and should not be allowed. Incidentally, the novelty factor would probably give the station tremendous ratings - if only for a short time.
 
But somebody needs to buy the sports guys a professional sound card, because their Soundblaster has such awful hum that the high school game was nearly inaudible on AM and FM. Talk about blowing your first impression.

There should be minimum technical standards on the broadcast bands. I've heard stuff like this, too. I don't know why high school football gets a pass when it comes to legalities like AM broadcast power at night and incredibly poor audio quality.
 
I disagree. I think brokered radio serves the public interest. There are ethnic groups that are too small to have the money to buy a station. There are musical tastes that are not commercially viable for fulltime formats. Your blanket statement should also include stations like KPFT and others that offer airtime to groups that cannot garner enough of a financial base to provide the debt service on a fulltime stations. Certainly Christian ministries that buy time or offer a percentage of the gifts they receive by placing their programs on stations are not serving the public interest. Likewise, the guy that might do a Saturday night oldies show on such a station would not serve the public interest if your comments were correct. (Fart sound...uh, excuse me).

To offer some clarity, stations like KHCB might be considered as a brokered station in that they allow their airwaves to be utilized buy ministries that are separate from the station. KPFT allows programmers to do their own shows. The brokered stations that sell time in blocks offer the same. Typically these are groups that have no other radio service available to them locally. If allowing those with no radio service at least some time daily or weekly on a station is not serving the public interest, then what is?
 
If I had the money, I would program continuous farts - to make a point about brokered radio. It does not serve the public interest, and should not be allowed. Incidentally, the novelty factor would probably give the station tremendous ratings - if only for a short time.

Without the option of brokered programming, a lot of AM stations would be out of business. The brokered time programming model is pretty much a last resort for a station owner. If you can't make money with brokered ethnic or religion, it's time to pull the plug and return the license to the FCC.

I am totally mystified why you think such programming "does not serve the public interest." Are you saying those target audiences have no right to programming directed at them? Please explain.
 
- For better or worse, the FCC has no regulations prohibiting broadcasts of poor audio quality. The station must be *capable* of broadcasting at some minimum quality, but if it wishes to deliver a program that contains hum or noise or poor frequency response or distortion or ???, the Commission really doesn't care.

- For most of the "golden age" of radio, brokered programming was the way the industry made a profit. Stations would sell 15 or 30 or 60 minutes to an advertiser, who would in turn produce a program they hoped would attract an audience - and contain occasional mentions of the sponsor's product. It took television to bring brokered radio to an end for mainstream audiences.
 
I disagree. I think brokered radio serves the public interest. There are ethnic groups that are too small to have the money to buy a station.

Nope - it is just who has money. You get somebody with money he gets on the air, even if nobody listens. That is 99% of all Christian radio preachers for example. Nobody is served, the guy hears himself on the radio. That is not in the public interest. The underserved minority argument doesn't hold water, because only underserved minorities who have money can buy time. Others are out of luck. Not a very fair system when only the rich have access to the airwaves.
 
You could say the same thing about corporate run radio such as Clear Channel. Those with money run the radio the way they see fit.
 
Wow, what an poorly thought out argument. You are aware we live in a cash economy, right? So, if I understand things correctly, nobody serves the public interest in radio because radio is stuck in the cash economy we are all in. Ethnic groups, ministries or any other entity has options: buy time for a couple of hundred bucks an hour to serve their community or spend several million to buy a station. I see, spending a couple of hundred dollars is certainly catering to the upper crust in your book. It would be much better, I suppose to eliminate that in your book. Only the rich have access, wow, what a foolish statement. I suppose the rich person is one with a couple of hundred bucks in their pocket and trying to serve the unserved. Those dang rich people, I suppose you'd mutter under your breath. Thinking of ministries, I can think of many that have had quite an impact. Billy Graham used to 'buy time'. I knew the guy that used to coach him. Many charitable organizations build themselves up to the point of having great impact by buying time. And amazingly they didn't have deep pockets and bank accounts with lots of commas and zeros in the beginning. Brokered time is literally an ant mound size mountain to entry in radio where other options are indeed mountains. I never knew my station was such lowlife since we're brokered time.

It seems you, rbrucecarter5, are bent toward the negative not the positive. I wish I had the magic words that could pool your energies toward the positive. I'm sure you have many qualities that when used to be positive and encouraging could work wonders for others and make you smile more. I believe inside everyone are some good qualities and I'd love to see yours shine through your words here.

Brokered radio may not be the last option, but it sure is the easiest. Formats are sometimes successful but it is the ramp up to success that makes them economic nightmares because the level of success usually won't repay the ramp up investment. Paid religion usually ends up with plenty of unsold time and way too many ministries want the time for free, offering a percentage of the donations from your zip codes reached and then divided by stations. That $40 monthly check hardly pays for those daily 30 minute broadcasts and Focus on the Family (back then) made you reach $300 a month for your share before you got a penny. The local preachers, many times from small congregations, mostly paid from their pocket. They were never asking for donations and the truth be told, I gave them a rate I knew they could afford so they could keep going. I charged one guy $20 a week for his program. My regular rate was more than double that.

It is true many of the AM stations would go under without brokered time. In fact brokered time might be a deciding factor for some AM talkers. If it wasn't for the paid weekend shows and the infomercials they might be in red ink.
 
Thinking of ministries, I can think of many that have had quite an impact. Billy Graham used to 'buy time'. I knew the guy that used to coach him.

I freely admit to being really cynical about brokered time religious broadcasting. I wasn't always that way. I came into radio with high hopes and lofty motivations. It did not take long to be immersed in the realities of brokered Christian. We were the outcasts because we dared to play Christian rock music. Not wimpy CCM - Christian rock. It didn't matter to station ownership that the ratings soared through the roof when we were on the air. We didn't fit their nice little KJV only, anti-CCM mold. The show before us ran over, stealing our time - that was OK with them. They preached, we were music so it was OK. The show before us almost burned down the station by leaving the coffee maker on when the water evaporated. That was OK, they preached. It was our fault for not checking the coffee maker (none of us drank coffee). One of their brokered preachers was such a tobacco abuser that you would get physically sick if you were within 10 feet of him. The stench of his addiction remained for hours after he left the station. Another of their brokered preachers beat the _____ out of his wife. We witnessed it. But his check was good each week. So was the smoker. One of the shows assailed us and verbally attacked us outside the studio because were weren't "baptized in the spirit" enough to suit them. Complaints about their behavior were ignored. They paid for their time. It went on and on --- Our rates were raised, we were given undesirable time slots, etc. even though we paid on time every week. I am DONE with Christian radio - even though we had thousands of positive calls, salvations, rededications, helping people out, sponsoring major concerts, doing world premieres, having live in studio interviews with prominent artists, live music in studio - even prevented suicides. Our checks were all that mattered to the owners. Ratings did not.

I am glad some people get served by brokered radio. I am glad you stay afloat doing it. But it is nothing I get excited about. It is the antithesis of programming formats people actually want to listen to. It is ruining AM radio for folks like us that remember the golden age of top-40 AM, and I wish it would go down the turbo-flush along with talk, sports, and foreign language stuff.
 
In other words, as far as you are concerned, everyone should like what you like, and anyone who doesn't like what you like isn't entitled to an opinion.

Right?
 
I can certainly share with you on the hate some ministries spread. I do have to say I was treated worse by some ministries than any advertising client ever treated me. There are some good ones out there.

It is true money talks at a station where a single dollar can be the difference between red and black ink. We had rules when we were ministry oriented. Nobody went over, nobody criticized and you treated people well in the building. I cancelled some folks that didn't. I might be the exception, but for me your dollar was just as good as the next guy's. And if I had to chase the money and jump through hoops to get it, you got the heart to heart about being too much trouble than you were worth.

Brokered radio doesn't care about ratings or number of listeners. We let the most fundamental concept of radio prevail: you bring your audience to the station for your program. If you have an audience you will be able to fund it with advertising or support of some kind and if not, you won't be around. It's really no different than the person that went to the station back in the 1950s and said this rock and roll is going to be big. Let me give it a shot on your station (only they usually didn't buy the time but tried to create an audience at a time the station didn't find profitable).

I hear what you are saying about brokered radio taking over what was a fun radio band to listen to. I grew up when AM was king. I'm monolingual and don't understand other languages but in these programmer's defense, many times that program was the only thing that small segment of Houston had on the AM or FM dial. Imagine all radio except one for a couple of hours each week is not in a language you are most comfortable with. During that two hours you hear songs you heard growing up and hear news and information useful to you. Imagine if you will being in Bolivia or China or Russia. Nothing on radio or TV in English except that one little station where somebody shows up each week to play the songs you know, deliver a news wrap-up and teach you how to function in this strange new world. You hear about merchants that welcome you and can understand you when you can't make yourself understood in the language everyone speaks. I think you can see it's more of a lifeline than just somebody that wants to gloat about being on the radio or milk as much money out of them as possible. Sure, there might only be a few thousand of you in the whole listening area but that doesn't make those two hours any less crucial to you coping in the place where you find yourself. Many of these folks looked at it as a labor of love, maybe clearing $50 or $100 a week for all the work. It never was their fulltime job.

Sure, there are some time buyers that are in it because they're vain but most have an interest or a community that is not being covered by radio or media in general. And a few were business folks looking to build a living by doing radio. Like Christian radio there were some bad eggs but like my experience running a Christian teaching and a brokered time station, far more were sincere and honorable.

Some had huge audiences. I used to get griped at by listeners for not getting more line for the requests and dedications on the polka shows. The phone would start ringing 2 hours before. The phone kept ringing after the show another hour or two with people trying to get requests in on the next week's show and some wrote in to avoid the phones. Our Cajun show was almost as popular. In each case the host bought the time and sold ads to pay for it. We even had a guy that did a show on cryogenics. Small audience for sure but he had plenty of experts in the field that he interviewed. One guy simply did a talk show on shopping where he interviewed mom and pop businesses saying how they started and what they stocked, each show centering on a certain area of town. None of the businesses had enough sales to buy ads on Houston radio but for $140 they could get 5 minutes on 4 shows. During that time a guy wanted to do a show on car repair but he opted for a bigger station. He's now heard in several cities on a number of talk stations. We had a lawyer and a CPA that offered free 'advice' to callers that purchased their time. While it was to bolster business, lots of folks got some much needed information. These folks didn't have other options, brokered radio was all that was available and the only option within their budget. If we hadn't opted to allow this, nobody would have had these opportunities.

Radio, like most of the business world, has no 'entry point' for those that are small or just starting out. We simply said, okay, here's your entry, sort of like that little small market station that would put you on the air with no experience so you could grow to the point of entry at a larger station. Sure that's not what AM radio was but it is a harsh reality today. I'd love to do a format. After all I was on air and in programming before sales and management. I understand the reality I face if I did and just what would happen if I did get an audience and financial success. Especially the AM daytimer and AM with low nighttime power have limited options amid the large number of signals in a major market. In the end, it's keeping the lights on that counts over and above ratings and listeners. A million listeners or a 5 share won't pay the bills, only money will do that and listeners does not always equal money and ratings doesn't mean money either. Sure both go a long way toward getting that money but we've witnessed seeming popular stations switch formats for financial reasons, not because of few listeners and poor ratings.

To quote a Ten Years After song...I'd Love To Change The World. I don't know how so I just deal with it as it is and stay watchful for that little opening that's not being guarded.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom