• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Matty In The Morning Goes After Gizelle and Tommy ?

C

Casablanca

Guest
Anyone hear the full discussion on Kiss this morning going after the publicity spread in this morning's Boston Globe of Gizelle Bundchen and Tom Brady. What a disgusting puff piece. If Tom Brady ever had Duende he is beginning to lose it. Please, no more butt shots of either one of them. Time for the 30 year old Tom Brady to grow up.
 
So, let me get this straight...

You don't want the media to give Brady a pass.

Matty exposes some stuff about Brady, that some might say is contrary to giving him the pass that you don't want him to get from the media.

You come here and badmouth Brady some more for those who might have missed it.

Just making sure I have it right.
 
Huh?


Neanderpaul said:
So, let me get this straight...

You don't want the media to give Brady a pass.

Matty exposes some stuff about Brady, that some might say is contrary to giving him the pass that you don't want him to get from the media.

You come here and badmouth Brady some more for those who might have missed it.

Just making sure I have it right.
 
I have it figured out... Casa is a JETS fan! No wonder he has so much hostility for Brady. Why, I'll bet he's a YANKEES fan too. ;D

one thing I agree with is the sports media in this city definitely s_uck up to a lot of the jocks.
 
No, I am a friend of responsible fatherhood...and a Red Sox fan even though they are being swept by the yankees :mad:

SonicAl said:
I have it figured out... Casa is a JETS fan! No wonder he has so much hostility for Brady. Why, I'll bet he's a YANKEES fan too. ;D

one thing I agree with is the sports media in this city definitely s_uck up to a lot of the jocks.
 
Casablanca said:
Time for the 30 year old Tom Brady to grow up.

Thanks. I needed a good laugh today. You, of all people, calling for someone else to grow up. Hysterical. Further, when Neanderpaul calls you on your duplicity, you don't understand it. Perfect. The best comedy writer in the world couldn't top this.

I wasn't aware that the New England Patriots hired Tom Brady for the express purpose of being a role model for children. He's a football player. Deal with it.
 
Glad to read that you think Tom Brady is not a role model. I'll remember that next time I see him mobbed by young kids.


dumber than a box of hair said:
Casablanca said:
Time for the 30 year old Tom Brady to grow up.

Thanks. I needed a good laugh today. You, of all people, calling for someone else to grow up. Hysterical. Further, when Neanderpaul calls you on your duplicity, you don't understand it. Perfect. The best comedy writer in the world couldn't top this.

I wasn't aware that the New England Patriots hired Tom Brady for the express purpose of being a role model for children. He's a football player. Deal with it.
 
Casablanca said:
Glad to read that you think Tom Brady is not a role model. I'll remember that next time I see him mobbed by young kids.

Actually, Tom Brady's a great role model for kids. He showed that you don't have to get picked first to be a winner. He isn't a criminal. He doesn't do drugs. He doesn't drink in public. He gets to have sex with several of the world's most beautiful women. And yeah...he is now a father. What a great role model! A father who's there for his kid. See, you're vilifying the guy for her choice not to annoint the child with his last name. Since when is it a fault? Much less the father's responsibility?

If anything, the Boston media should herald the guy as the new standard for fatherhood everywhere.

The concept of the married, two-parent family has been dead for decades. Look at divorce stats. You might want to step in to the real world. Tom Brady is everything good about modern-day fatherhood. He has the means to contribute to the child's well-being. He CAN be there for the child's upbringing, but it's a two-way street. What if people called Giselle a whore for mothering a child out of wedlock? In your world, she should be painted with the scarlet letter.

Drop your agenda. If I were to list all of the non-caucasian athletes who've fathered children out of wedlock, you'd pull the racist card faster than the Red Sox slide this past week. The only reason he should be ripped is if he walks out on the kid...and it's less than a week old. A little premature for anyone to make that assessment dont'cha think?

And this thread's quickly heading to the death that is "Take It Outside" because it has less than zero to do with radio. Because it's a NON-STORY!

Let it go man.
 
Can someone please tell me why Casa is allowed to go off on his daily anti-Brady rants on this board?

If it's not Brady, it's Carr or Severin or Graham. Someone seems to be a bit bitter about the cards dealt to him.
 
Casablanca said:
Glad to read that you think Tom Brady is not a role model. I'll remember that next time I see him mobbed by young kids.

Just because he's mobbed by kids, suddenly that makes him a role model? Just when I thought you couldn't be any more funny, you top yourself.
 
Talk about pure ultra left wing gar barge. The traditional family... a mother, a father, children and a picket fence is not dead. That takes a real commitment which many do not want to do and therefore the high rate of divorce. Your bitterness makes it sound like you are either a product of a divorce or one of the aggrieved in a martial break up. But it is pointless to start the blame game.

The fact that Brady and Moynahan both have money means that their son will never suffer for financial wants but there is more to a family than a big bank account.

Some of the richest kids become the most screwed up. Hollywood is full of them.

And yes, the traditional family has a many problems but that traditional unit still has a lot going for it in adding stability and predictability to a child's life.

I am not condeming Tom Brady or Bridgit Moynahan. They had the child and did not abort it. That makes them pretty good people to begin with. Still, their arrangement...better their estrangement from each other has got to affect their son.

My better half is a family therapist and she deals with these cases and their fall out every day. It was her thought that both parents have already done a disservice to their child by not at least giving him the hypenated name Moynahan-Brady or Brady-Moynahan. Sounds reasonable and in the best interest of their child which for 21 years will have to be their major and legal concern.

I wish them and their child well. We all should. I know I sound like Teyvia in Fiddler on the Roof but Tradition is not always a bad thing and the media should not dismiss it out of hand. :)

Neanderpaul said:
Casablanca said:
Glad to read that you think Tom Brady is not a role model. I'll remember that next time I see him mobbed by young kids.

Actually, Tom Brady's a great role model for kids. He showed that you don't have to get picked first to be a winner. He isn't a criminal. He doesn't do drugs. He doesn't drink in public. He gets to have sex with several of the world's most beautiful women. And yeah...he is now a father. What a great role model! A father who's there for his kid. See, you're vilifying the guy for her choice not to annoint the child with his last name. Since when is it a fault? Much less the father's responsibility?

If anything, the Boston media should herald the guy as the new standard for fatherhood everywhere.

The concept of the married, two-parent family has been dead for decades. Look at divorce stats. You might want to step in to the real world. Tom Brady is everything good about modern-day fatherhood. He has the means to contribute to the child's well-being. He CAN be there for the child's upbringing, but it's a two-way street. What if people called Giselle a whore for mothering a child out of wedlock? In your world, she should be painted with the scarlet letter.

Drop your agenda. If I were to list all of the non-caucasian athletes who've fathered children out of wedlock, you'd pull the racist card faster than the Red Sox slide this past week. The only reason he should be ripped is if he walks out on the kid...and it's less than a week old. A little premature for anyone to make that assessment dont'cha think?

And this thread's quickly heading to the death that is "Take It Outside" because it has less than zero to do with radio. Because it's a NON-STORY!

Let it go man.
 
Casablanca said:
I am not condeming Tom Brady or Bridgit Moynahan. They had the child and did not abort it. That makes them pretty good people to begin with. Still, their arrangement...better their estrangement from each other has got to affect their son.

My better half is a family therapist and she deals with these cases and their fall out every day. It was her thought that both parents have already done a disservice to their child by not at least giving him the hypenated name Moynahan-Brady or Brady-Moynahan. Sounds reasonable and in the best interest of their child which for 21 years will have to be their major and legal concern.

I wish them and their child well. We all should. I know I sound like Teyvia in Fiddler on the Roof but Tradition is not always a bad thing and the media should not dismiss it out of hand. :)

I agree that it is a bunch of left-wing moonbat crap to say that the traditional man-woman married family is dead. That sounds like the homosexual lobby's argument and it's pure bunk.

That said, what makes you think Tom doesn't want his child to have his last name? How do you know it's not Moynahan who isn't allowing him to do that?
 
NHRonin said:
I agree that it is a bunch of left-wing moonbat crap to say that the traditional man-woman married family is dead. That sounds like the homosexual lobby's argument and it's pure bunk.

I see more love in my dear friend Angela and her partner Amy's family than I ever did in my own "traditional" family. The man-woman family isn't dead but who's to say that one family is valid and another isn't. Besides, if it's good enough for Dick Cheney's daughter... :)
 
Casablanca said:
Talk about pure ultra left wing gar barge. The traditional family... a mother, a father, children and a picket fence is not dead. That takes a real commitment which many do not want to do and therefore the high rate of divorce. Your bitterness makes it sound like you are either a product of a divorce or one of the aggrieved in a martial break up. But it is pointless to start the blame game.

The fact that Brady and Moynahan both have money means that their son will never suffer for financial wants but there is more to a family than a big bank account.

Some of the richest kids become the most screwed up. Hollywood is full of them.

And yes, the traditional family has a many problems but that traditional unit still has a lot going for it in adding stability and predictability to a child's life.

I am not condeming Tom Brady or Bridgit Moynahan. They had the child and did not abort it. That makes them pretty good people to begin with. Still, their arrangement...better their estrangement from each other has got to affect their son.

My better half is a family therapist and she deals with these cases and their fall out every day. It was her thought that both parents have already done a disservice to their child by not at least giving him the hypenated name Moynahan-Brady or Brady-Moynahan. Sounds reasonable and in the best interest of their child which for 21 years will have to be their major and legal concern.



Neanderpaul said:
Casablanca said:
Glad to read that you think Tom Brady is not a role model. I'll remember that next time I see him mobbed by young kids.

Actually, Tom Brady's a great role model for kids. He showed that you don't have to get picked first to be a winner. He isn't a criminal. He doesn't do drugs. He doesn't drink in public. He gets to have sex with several of the world's most beautiful women. And yeah...he is now a father. What a great role model! A father who's there for his kid. See, you're vilifying the guy for her choice not to annoint the child with his last name. Since when is it a fault? Much less the father's responsibility?

If anything, the Boston media should herald the guy as the new standard for fatherhood everywhere.

The concept of the married, two-parent family has been dead for decades. Look at divorce stats. You might want to step in to the real world. Tom Brady is everything good about modern-day fatherhood. He has the means to contribute to the child's well-being. He CAN be there for the child's upbringing, but it's a two-way street. What if people called Giselle a whore for mothering a child out of wedlock? In your world, she should be painted with the scarlet letter.

Drop your agenda. If I were to list all of the non-caucasian athletes who've fathered children out of wedlock, you'd pull the racist card faster than the Red Sox slide this past week. The only reason he should be ripped is if he walks out on the kid...and it's less than a week old. A little premature for anyone to make that assessment dont'cha think?

And this thread's quickly heading to the death that is "Take It Outside" because it has less than zero to do with radio. Because it's a NON-STORY!

Let it go man.

Your bitterness makes it sound like you are either a product of a divorce or one of the aggrieved in a martial break up. But it is pointless to start the blame game.

That is the most ignorant comment I have read on this board.

My better half is a family therapist and she deals with these cases and their fall out every day. It was her thought that both parents have already done a disservice to their child by not at least giving him the hypenated name Moynahan-Brady or Brady-Moynahan. Sounds reasonable and in the best interest of their child which for 21 years will have to be their major and legal concern.

And she knows ALL the details of the scenario as discussed by Bridget & Tom?? A good therapist knows not to judge based on generalizations, rather to draw conclusions based on individual facts. Although, she married you, so maybe her judgement ain't too good ;) JUST KIDDING!!

Back to radio, I did hear the Matty bit this morning. He took a point of view, Lisa took another and Billy, yet another. It was local, topical & hit home with the dmo. Good radio.
 
Neanderpaul said:
What if people called Giselle a whore for mothering a child out of wedlock? In your world, she should be painted with the scarlet letter.

Correction: I meant the lovely Ms. Moynihan.

Who BTW...is far more beautiful that Mr. Brady's current amazing looking GF IMHO
 
Casablanca said:
Talk about pure ultra left wing gar barge. The traditional family... a mother, a father, children and a picket fence is not dead. That takes a real commitment which many do not want to do and therefore the high rate of divorce. Your bitterness makes it sound like you are either a product of a divorce or one of the aggrieved in a martial break up. But it is pointless to start the blame game.

Hate to tell you...but statistics don't favor your argument. The numbers are steadily rising.

Almost 33% of American families are single parented. Half of American children will live in a single parent environment at some point in their childhood. 33% of children are born to unmarried parents, and more than half of Americans have been in a stepfamily situation.

I'm a proud product of a broken home. My father was a complete jerk. My mother raised me on a waitress' pay. And no stronger a woman exists in the world. I'd rather that scenario than the BS "white picket fence" dream world you'd like everyone to believe in. Just because there are two parents, doesn't mean the familial unit is any more valid, or stable. Talk about dispensing propaganda?

It's amazing how those who tout the moral high ground, and the traditional family values are often found to be the most deviant. You need only to look at the recent headlines to see this.

Mr. Vice President's lesbian daughter, and Mr. President's unwed, pregnant daughter ring a bell?


And before you throw me the declining divorce rates, and the return to traditional family values, don't forget that the number of unmarried families has risen at a rate higher than any other familial statistic. Therefore eliminating a good number of divorce cases. If you're unmarried, it's easier to dissolve the relationship...which brings us back to Mr. Brady, and Ms. Moynihan.

Their familial decisions are none of anyone but their business.

Which confirms the non-story nature of your post.

But...you'll continue. Because for some reason. You can't let it go.
 
Well, at least we can agree that Ms Moynahan is far more beautiful than Ms. Bundchen appears to be in print.
BTW, your mother should be congratulated for raising her family single handedly as it appears she did. It could not have been easy which is basically my point. A stable two parent arrangement has to be more balanced and yes, that includes the traditional man and woman, but also two women or two men. It is the love they give their children that is important to me - not their sex.
I think this thread is getting ... thread bear. Time to move on unless something relating to it in the media develops. PEACE :)
Neanderpaul said:
Casablanca said:
Talk about pure ultra left wing gar barge. The traditional family... a mother, a father, children and a picket fence is not dead. That takes a real commitment which many do not want to do and therefore the high rate of divorce. Your bitterness makes it sound like you are either a product of a divorce or one of the aggrieved in a martial break up. But it is pointless to start the blame game.

Hate to tell you...but statistics don't favor your argument. The numbers are steadily rising.

Almost 33% of American families are single parented. Half of American children will live in a single parent environment at some point in their childhood. 33% of children are born to unmarried parents, and more than half of Americans have been in a stepfamily situation.

I'm a proud product of a broken home. My father was a complete jerk. My mother raised me on a waitress' pay. And no stronger a woman exists in the world. I'd rather that scenario than the BS "white picket fence" dream world you'd like everyone to believe in. Just because there are two parents, doesn't mean the familial unit is any more valid, or stable. Talk about dispensing propaganda?

It's amazing how those who tout the moral high ground, and the traditional family values are often found to be the most deviant. You need only to look at the recent headlines to see this.

Mr. Vice President's lesbian daughter, and Mr. President's unwed, pregnant daughter ring a bell?


And before you throw me the declining divorce rates, and the return to traditional family values, don't forget that the number of unmarried families has risen at a rate higher than any other familial statistic. Therefore eliminating a good number of divorce cases. If you're unmarried, it's easier to dissolve the relationship...which brings us back to Mr. Brady, and Ms. Moynihan.

Their familial decisions are none of anyone but their business.

Which confirms the non-story nature of your post.

But...you'll continue. Because for some reason. You can't let it go.
 
Can someone please tell me why Casa is allowed to go off on his daily anti-Brady rants on this board?

Why bother, on this or any other topic? More often than not, your post will be deleted.
 
Casablanca said:
It was her thought that both parents have already done a disservice to their child by not at least giving him the hypenated name Moynahan-Brady or Brady-Moynahan.


How is not giving the kids a hypenate a disservice? Have you ever seen a 1st grader try to write even a simple name like 'Smith' or 'Jones'? Hypens are nothing more than parental ego. Marking their territory, as it were.

Is just a question: is your 'better half' a family therapist like that Princess Chyanne was? (by the way, that's just a joke, I'm sure she is a well qualified, lovely person. I only add the disclaimer because some hyper people around here take things far too seriously) :-*
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom